Introduce `getImpl()` that tries the simplification logic from `get()`
and then gives up. This allows the logic to be reused elsewhere in a
follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 215963
Avoid RAUW-ing `ConstantExpr` when an operand changes unless the new
`ConstantExpr` already has users. This prevents the RAUW from rippling
up the expression tree unnecessarily.
This commit indirectly adds test coverage for r215953 (this is how I
came across the bug).
This is part of PR20515.
llvm-svn: 215960
Rewrite `ConstantUniqueMap` to be more similar to
`ConstantAggrUniqueMap`.
- Use a `DenseMap` with custom MapInfo instead of a `std::map` with
linear lookups and deletion.
- Don't waste memory explicitly storing (heavyweight) keys.
Only `ConstantExpr` and `InlineAsm` actually use this data structure, so
I also updated them to use it.
This code cleanup is a precursor to reducing RAUW traffic on
`ConstantExpr` -- I felt badly adding a new (linear) call to
`ConstantUniqueMap::FindExistingKey`, so this designs away the concern.
A follow-up commit will transition the users of `ConstantAggrUniqueMap`
over.
llvm-svn: 215957
file with -macho, the Mach-O specific object file parser option.
After some discussion I chose to do this implementation contained in the logic
of llvm-objdump’s MachODump.cpp using a second disassembler for thumb when
needed and with updates mostly contained in the MachOObjectFile class.
llvm-svn: 215931
ARM in particular is getting dangerously close to exceeding 32 bits worth of
possible subtarget features. When this happens, various parts of MC start to
fail inexplicably as masks get truncated to "unsigned".
Mostly just refactoring at present, and there's probably no way to test.
llvm-svn: 215887
We already handle the no-slabs case when checking whether the current slab
is large enough: if no slabs have been allocated, CurPtr and End are both 0.
alignPtr(0), will still be 0, and so "if (Ptr + Size <= End)" fails.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4943
llvm-svn: 215841
While *most* (X sdiv 1) operations will get caught by InstSimplify, it
is still possible for a sdiv to appear in the worklist which hasn't been
simplified yet.
This means that it is possible for 0 - (X sdiv 1) to get transformed
into (X sdiv -1); dividing by -1 can make the transform produce undef
values instead of the proper result.
Sorry for the lack of testcase, it's a bit problematic because it relies
on the exact order of operations in the worklist.
llvm-svn: 215818
We used to assume that any fixed-offset stack object was not aliased. This
meant that no IR value could point to the memory contained in such an object.
This is a reasonable default, but is not a universally-correct
target-independent fact. For example, on PowerPC (both Darwin and non-Darwin),
some byval arguments are allocated at fixed offsets by the ABI. These, however,
certainly can be pointed to by IR values. This change moves the 'isAliased'
logic out of FixedStackPseudoSourceValue and into MFI, and allows the isAliased
property to be overridden for fixed-offset objects.
This will be used by an upcoming commit to the PowerPC backend to fix PR20280.
No functionality change intended (the behavior of
FixedStackPseudoSourceValue::isAliased has been made more conservative for
callers that don't pass an MFI object, but I don't see any in-tree callers that
do that).
llvm-svn: 215794
This reverts commit r215784 / 3f8a26f6fe16cc76c98ab21db2c600bd7defbbaa.
LLD has 3 StringSaver's, one of which takes a lock when saving the
string... Need to investigate more closely.
llvm-svn: 215790
This class is generally useful.
In breaking it out, the primary change is that it has been made
non-virtual. It seems like being abstract led to there being 3 different
(2 in llvm + 1 in clang) concrete implementations which disagreed about
the ownership of the saved strings (see the manual call to free() in the
unittest StrDupSaver; yes this is different from the CommandLine.cpp
StrDupSaver which owns the stored strings; which is different from
Clang's StringSetSaver which just holds a reference to a
std::set<std::string> which owns the strings).
I've identified 2 other places in the
codebase that are open-coding this pattern:
memcpy(Alloc.Allocate<char>(strlen(S)+1), S, strlen(S)+1)
I'll be switching them over. They are
* llvm::sys::Process::GetArgumentVector
* The StringAllocator member of YAMLIO's Input class
This also will allow simplifying Clang's driver.cpp quite a bit.
Let me know if there are any other places that could benefit from
StringSaver. I'm also thinking of adding a saveStringRef member for
getting a stable StringRef.
llvm-svn: 215784
This reverts:
r215595 "[FastISel][X86] Add large code model support for materializing floating-point constants."
r215594 "[FastISel][X86] Use XOR to materialize the "0" value."
r215593 "[FastISel][X86] Emit more efficient instructions for integer constant materialization."
r215591 "[FastISel][AArch64] Make use of the zero register when possible."
r215588 "[FastISel] Let the target decide first if it wants to materialize a constant."
r215582 "[FastISel][AArch64] Cleanup constant materialization code. NFCI."
llvm-svn: 215673
As X86MCAsmInfoDarwin uses '##' as CommentString although a single '#' starts a
comment a workaround for this special case is added.
Fixes divisions in constant expressions for the AArch64 assembler and other
targets which use '//' as CommentString.
Patch by Janne Grunau!
llvm-svn: 215615
This changes the order in which FastISel tries to materialize a constant.
Originally it would try to use a simple target-independent approach, which
can lead to the generation of inefficient code.
On X86 this would result in the use of movabsq to materialize any 64bit
integer constant - even for simple and small values such as 0 and 1. Also
some very funny floating-point materialization could be observed too.
On AArch64 it would materialize the constant 0 in a register even the
architecture has an actual "zero" register.
On ARM it would generate unnecessary mov instructions or not use mvn.
This change simply changes the order and always asks the target first if it
likes to materialize the constant. This doesn't fix all the issues
mentioned above, but it enables the targets to implement such
optimizations.
Related to <rdar://problem/17420988>.
llvm-svn: 215588
New function to erase a machine instruction and mark DBG_VALUE
for removal. A DBG_VALUE is marked for removal when it references
an operand defined in the instruction.
Use the new function to cleanup code in dead machine instruction
removal pass.
llvm-svn: 215580
critical edge has been split. The MachineDominatorTree will when lazy update the
underlying dominance properties when require.
** Context **
This is a follow-up of r215410.
Each time a critical edge is split this invalidates the dominator tree
information. Thus, subsequent queries of that interface will be slow until the
underlying information is actually recomputed (costly).
** Problem **
Prior to this patch, splitting a critical edge needed to query the dominator
tree to update the dominator information.
Therefore, splitting a bunch of critical edges will likely produce poor
performance as each query to the dominator tree will use the slow query path.
This happens a lot in passes like MachineSink and PHIElimination.
** Proposed Solution **
Splitting a critical edge is a local modification of the CFG. Moreover, as soon
as a critical edge is split, it is not critical anymore and thus cannot be a
candidate for critical edge splitting anymore. In other words, the predecessor
and successor of a basic block inserted on a critical edge cannot be inserted by
critical edge splitting.
Using these observations, we can pile up the splitting of critical edge and
apply then at once before updating the DT information.
The core of this patch moves the update of the MachineDominatorTree information
from MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge to a lazy MachineDominatorTree.
** Performance **
Thanks to this patch, the motivating example compiles in 4- minutes instead of
6+ minutes. No test case added as the motivating example as nothing special but
being huge!
The binaries are strictly identical for all the llvm test-suite + SPECs with and
without this patch for both Os and O3.
Regarding compile time, I observed only noise, although on average I saw a
small improvement.
<rdar://problem/17894619>
llvm-svn: 215576
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments
as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we decide
they're useful)
Changes made by clang-tidy with minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 215558
Added avx512_movnt_vl multiclass for handling 256/128-bit forms of instruction.
Added encoding and lowering tests.
Reviewed by Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 215536
This implements PPCTargetLowering::getTgtMemIntrinsic for Altivec load/store
intrinsics. As with the construction of the MachineMemOperands for the
intrinsic calls used for unaligned load/store lowering, the only slight
complication is that we need to represent a larger memory range than the
loaded/stored value-type size (because the address is rounded down to an
aligned address, and we need to conservatively represent the entire possible
range of the actual access). This required adding an extra size field to
TargetLowering::IntrinsicInfo, and this was done in a way that required no
modifications to other targets (the size defaults to the store size of the
provided memory data type).
This fixes test/CodeGen/PowerPC/unal-altivec-wint.ll (so it can be un-XFAILed).
llvm-svn: 215512
Unfortunately, our use of the SDNode class hierarchy for INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and
INTRINSIC_VOID nodes is somewhat broken right now. These nodes sometimes are
used for memory intrinsics (those with MachineMemOperands), and sometimes not.
When not, the nodes are not created as instances of MemIntrinsicSDNode, but
rather created as some other subclass of SDNode using DAG::getNode. When they
are memory intrinsics, they are created using DAG::getMemIntrinsicNode as
instances of MemIntrinsicSDNode. MemIntrinsicSDNode is a subclass of
MemSDNode, but prior to r214452, we had a non-self-consistent setup whereby
MemIntrinsicSDNode::classof on INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and INTRINSIC_VOID would
return true but MemSDNode::classof on INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and INTRINSIC_VOID
would return false. In r214452, MemSDNode::classof was changed to return true
for INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and INTRINSIC_VOID, which is now self-consistent. The
problem is that neither the pre-r214452 logic and the post-r214452 logic are
really right. The truth is that not all INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN and INTRINSIC_VOID
nodes are instances of MemIntrinsicSDNode (or MemSDNode for that matter), and
the return value from classof needs to reflect that. This was broken before
r214452 (because MemIntrinsicSDNode::classof always returned true), and was
broken afterward (because MemSDNode::classof also always returned true), and
will now be correct.
The minimal solution is to grab one of the SubclassData bits (there is one left
for MemIntrinsicSDNode nodes) and use it to store whether or not a particular
INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN or INTRINSIC_VOID is really an instance of
MemIntrinsicSDNode or not. Doing this allows both MemIntrinsicSDNode::classof
and MemSDNode::classof to return the correct answer for the underlying object
for both the memory-intrinsic and non-memory-intrinsic cases.
This fixes the problem that r214452 created in the SelectionDAGDumper (thanks
to Matt Arsenault for pointing it out).
Because PowerPC does not implement getTgtMemIntrinsic, this change breaks
test/CodeGen/PowerPC/unal-altivec-wint.ll. I've XFAILed it for now, and will
fix it in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 215511
It's not clear what the semantics of a self-move should be. The
consensus appears to be that a self-move should leave the object in a
moved-from state, which is what our existing move assignment operator
does.
However, the MSVC 2013 STL will perform self-moves in some cases. In
particular, when doing a std::stable_sort of an already sorted APSInt
vector of an appropriate size, one of the merge steps will self-move
half of the elements.
We don't notice this when building with MSVC, because MSVC will not
synthesize the move assignment operator for APSInt. Presumably MSVC
does this because APInt, the base class, has user-declared special
members that implicitly delete move special members. Instead, MSVC
selects the copy-assign operator, which defends against self-assignment.
Clang, on the other hand, selects the move-assign operator, and we get
garbage APInts.
llvm-svn: 215478
