Otherwise ld.lld -save-temps will crash when writing to ResolutionFile.
llvm-lto2 -save-temps does not crash because it exits immediately.
Reviewed By: evgeny777
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75426
The goal of this patch is to maximize CPU utilization on multi-socket or high core count systems, so that parallel computations such as LLD/ThinLTO can use all hardware threads in the system. Before this patch, on Windows, a maximum of 64 hardware threads could be used at most, in some cases dispatched only on one CPU socket.
== Background ==
Windows doesn't have a flat cpu_set_t like Linux. Instead, it projects hardware CPUs (or NUMA nodes) to applications through a concept of "processor groups". A "processor" is the smallest unit of execution on a CPU, that is, an hyper-thread if SMT is active; a core otherwise. There's a limit of 32-bit processors on older 32-bit versions of Windows, which later was raised to 64-processors with 64-bit versions of Windows. This limit comes from the affinity mask, which historically is represented by the sizeof(void*). Consequently, the concept of "processor groups" was introduced for dealing with systems with more than 64 hyper-threads.
By default, the Windows OS assigns only one "processor group" to each starting application, in a round-robin manner. If the application wants to use more processors, it needs to programmatically enable it, by assigning threads to other "processor groups". This also means that affinity cannot cross "processor group" boundaries; one can only specify a "preferred" group on start-up, but the application is free to allocate more groups if it wants to.
This creates a peculiar situation, where newer CPUs like the AMD EPYC 7702P (64-cores, 128-hyperthreads) are projected by the OS as two (2) "processor groups". This means that by default, an application can only use half of the cores. This situation could only get worse in the years to come, as dies with more cores will appear on the market.
== The problem ==
The heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() API was introduced so that only *one hardware thread per core* was used. Once that API returns, that original intention is lost, only the number of threads is retained. Consider a situation, on Windows, where the system has 2 CPU sockets, 18 cores each, each core having 2 hyper-threads, for a total of 72 hyper-threads. Both heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() and hardware_concurrency() currently return 36, because on Windows they are simply wrappers over std:🧵:hardware_concurrency() -- which can only return processors from the current "processor group".
== The changes in this patch ==
To solve this situation, we capture (and retain) the initial intention until the point of usage, through a new ThreadPoolStrategy class. The number of threads to use is deferred as late as possible, until the moment where the std::threads are created (ThreadPool in the case of ThinLTO).
When using hardware_concurrency(), setting ThreadCount to 0 now means to use all the possible hardware CPU (SMT) threads. Providing a ThreadCount above to the maximum number of threads will have no effect, the maximum will be used instead.
The heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() is similar to hardware_concurrency(), except that only one thread per hardware *core* will be used.
When LLVM_ENABLE_THREADS is OFF, the threading APIs will always return 1, to ensure any caller loops will be exercised at least once.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71775
This extends the RemarkStreamer to allow for other emitters (e.g.
frontends, SIL, etc.) to emit remarks through a common interface.
See changes in llvm/docs/Remarks.rst for motivation and design choices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73676
Summary:
The old pass manager separated speed optimization and size optimization
levels into two unsigned values. Coallescing both in an enum in the new
pass manager may lead to unintentional casts and comparisons.
In particular, taking a look at how the loop unroll passes were constructed
previously, the Os/Oz are now (==new pass manager) treated just like O3,
likely unintentionally.
This change disallows raw comparisons between optimization levels, to
avoid such unintended effects. As an effect, the O{s|z} behavior changes
for loop unrolling and loop unroll and jam, matching O2 rather than O3.
The change also parameterizes the threshold values used for loop
unrolling, primarily to aid testing.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: zzheng, ychen, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72547
The lto::Config object saved on the global LTO object should not be
updated by any of the LTO backends. Otherwise we could run into
interference between threads utilizing it. Motivated by some proposed
changes that would have caused it to get modified in the ThinLTO
backends.
down to pass builder in ltobackend.
Currently CodeGenOpts like UnrollLoops/VectorizeLoop/VectorizeSLP in clang
are not passed down to pass builder in ltobackend when new pass manager is
used. This is inconsistent with the behavior when new pass manager is used
and thinlto is not used. Such inconsistency causes slp vectorization pass
not being enabled in ltobackend for O3 + thinlto right now. This patch
fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72386
Summary:
This adds support for embedding bitcode in a binary during LTO. The libLTO gains supports the `-lto-embed-bitcode` flag. The option allows users of the LTO library to embed a bitcode section. For example, LLD can pass the option via `ld.lld -mllvm=-lto-embed-bitcode`.
This feature allows doing something comparable to `clang -c -fembed-bitcode`, but on the (LTO) linker level. Having bitcode alongside native code has many use-cases. To give an example, the MacOS linker can create a `-bitcode_bundle` section containing bitcode. Also, having this feature built into LLVM is an alternative to 3rd party tools such as [[ https://github.com/travitch/whole-program-llvm | wllvm ]] or [[ https://github.com/SRI-CSL/gllvm | gllvm ]]. As with these tools, this feature simplifies creating "whole-program" llvm bitcode files, but in contrast to wllvm/gllvm it does not rely on a specific llvm frontend/driver.
Patch by Josef Eisl <josef.eisl@oracle.com>
Reviewers: #llvm, #clang, rsmith, pcc, alexshap, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: tejohnson, mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, aheejin, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, #llvm, #clang
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68213
Summary: IR printing has not been correctly supported with (Thin)LTO if the new pass manager is enabled. Previously we only get outputs from backend(codegen) passes, as they are still under legacy pass manager even when the new pass manager is enabled. This patch addresses the issue and enables IR printing for optimization passes with new pass manager + (Thin)LTO setting.
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, philip.pfaffe
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66253
llvm-svn: 369024
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
Summary:
With Split DWARF the resulting object file (then called skeleton CU)
contains the file name of another ("DWO") file with the debug info.
This can be a problem for remote compilation, as it will contain the
name of the file on the compilation server, not on the client.
To use Split DWARF with remote compilation, one needs to either
* make sure only relative paths are used, and mirror the build directory
structure of the client on the server,
* inject the desired file name on the client directly.
Since llc already supports the latter solution, we're just copying that
over. We allow setting the actual output filename separately from the
value of the DW_AT_[GNU_]dwo_name attribute in the skeleton CU.
Fixes PR40276.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, tejohnson
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59673
llvm-svn: 363496
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363415
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363328
Summary:
Trying to add the plumbing necessary to add tuning options to the new pass manager.
Testing with the flags for loop vectorize.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, jlebar, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59723
llvm-svn: 358763
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
Original llvm-svn: 355964
llvm-svn: 355984
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This fixes PR 37422
In ELF, non-weak symbols can also be non-prevailing. In this particular
PR, the __llvm_profile_* symbols are non-prevailing but weren't getting
dropped - causing multiply-defined errors with lld.
Also add a test, strong_non_prevailing.ll, to ensure that multiple
copies of a strong symbol are dropped.
To fix the test regressions exposed by this fix,
- do not mark prevailing copies for symbols with 'appending' linkage.
There's no one prevailing copy for such symbols.
- fix the prevailing version in dead-strip-fulllto.ll
- explicitly pass exported symbols to llvm-lto in fumcimport.ll and
funcimport_var.ll
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith,
dang, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54125
llvm-svn: 346436
All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.
TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.
Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246
llvm-svn: 344685
Summary:
All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.
TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.
Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246
llvm-svn: 344519
This can be used to preserve profiling information across codebase
changes that have widespread impact on mangled names, but across which
most profiling data should still be usable. For example, when switching
from libstdc++ to libc++, or from the old libstdc++ ABI to the new ABI,
or even from a 32-bit to a 64-bit build.
The user can provide a remapping file specifying parts of mangled names
that should be treated as equivalent (eg, std::__1 should be treated as
equivalent to std::__cxx11), and profile data will be treated as
applying to a particular function if its name is equivalent to the name
of a function in the profile data under the provided equivalences. See
the documentation change for a description of how this is configured.
Remapping is supported for both sample-based profiling and instruction
profiling. We do not support remapping indirect branch target
information, but all other profile data should be remapped
appropriately.
Support is only added for the new pass manager. If someone wants to also
add support for this for the old pass manager, doing so should be
straightforward.
This is the LLVM side of Clang r344199.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson, dlj, erik.pilkington
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51249
llvm-svn: 344200
Currently the code-model does not get saved in the module IR,
so if a code model is specified when compiling with LTO,
it gets lost and is not propagated properly to LTO. This patch,
along with one for the front end, fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52322
llvm-svn: 342760
Summary:
Enable these passes for CFI and WPD in ThinLTO and LTO with the new pass
manager. Add a couple of tests for both PMs based on the clang tests
tools/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-cfi*.ll, but just test
through llvm-lto2 and not with distributed ThinLTO.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49429
llvm-svn: 337461
Summary:
This change is necessary for D46464, which will pass -1 as the Task
ID for distributed backends, so that the save temps files don't end
up with "4294967295" in their path. For distributed back ends, when -1
is passed, don't append any Task ID.
An existing test (tools/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto_backend.ll) will
fail without this change after D46464.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46488
llvm-svn: 331591
Summary:
Support was added to the regular LTO backend, but not thinBackend.
This patch adds that support.
Reviewers: pcc, davide
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46376
llvm-svn: 331481
Summary: This enables debug fission on implicit ThinLTO when linked with gold. It will put the .dwo files in a directory specified by user.
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc, dblaikie
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, mehdi_amini, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44792
llvm-svn: 329988
This reverts commit 1f3bd185c53beb6aa68446974b7e80837abd6ef0 (r326107)
because it fails
ThinLTO/X86/diagnostic-handler-remarks-with-hotness.ll.
llvm-svn: 326975
This wires up -pass-remarks-hotness-threshold to LTO and ThinLTO.
Next is to change the clang driver to pass this
with -fdiagnostics-hotness-threshold.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41465
llvm-svn: 326107
Summary:
Removing the dropped symbols will prevent indirect call promotion in the
ThinLTO Backend from adding a new reference to a symbol, which can
result in linker unsats. This can happen when we compile with a sample
profile collected from one binary by used for another, which may have
profiled targets that aren't used in the new binary.
Note that until dropDeadSymbols handles variables and aliases (in
progress), we may not be able to remove the declaration and can still
have an issue.
Reviewers: grimar, davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42816
llvm-svn: 324299
Summary:
This complements the fixes in r323633 and r324075 which drop the
definitions of dead functions and variables, respectively.
Fixes PR36208.
Reviewers: grimar, rafael
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42856
llvm-svn: 324242
This fixes PR36187.
Patch teaches ThinLTO to drop non-prevailing variables,
just like we recently did for functions (in r323633).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42798
llvm-svn: 324075
