1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-24 05:23:45 +02:00
Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
0c1aee0b16 DI: Require subprogram definitions to be distinct
As a follow-up to r246098, require `DISubprogram` definitions
(`isDefinition: true`) to be 'distinct'.  Specifically, add an assembler
check, a verifier check, and bitcode upgrading logic to combat testcase
bitrot after the `DIBuilder` change.

While working on the testcases, I realized that
test/Linker/subprogram-linkonce-weak-odr.ll isn't relevant anymore.  Its
purpose was to check for a corner case in PR22792 where two subprogram
definitions match exactly and share the same metadata node.  The new
verifier check, requiring that subprogram definitions are 'distinct',
precludes that possibility.

I updated almost all the IR with the following script:

    git grep -l -E -e '= !DISubprogram\(.* isDefinition: true' |
    grep -v test/Bitcode |
    xargs sed -i '' -e 's/= \(!DISubprogram(.*, isDefinition: true\)/= distinct \1/'

Likely some variant of would work for out-of-tree testcases.

llvm-svn: 246327
2015-08-28 20:26:49 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
09b5c9c24d IR: Give 'DI' prefix to debug info metadata
Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`.  The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.

Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one.  It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs.  YMMV of
course.

Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py.  I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three.  It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).

Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.

llvm-svn: 236120
2015-04-29 16:38:44 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
2b96fcf60b Verifier: Check that @llvm.dbg.* intrinsics have a !dbg attachment
Before we start to rely on valid `!dbg` attachments, add a check to the
verifier that `@llvm.dbg.*` intrinsics always have one.  Also check that
the `scope:` fields point at the same `MDSubprogram`.

This is in the context of PR22778.  The check that the `inlinedAt:`
fields agree has baked for a while (since r234021), so I'll kill [1] the
`MDLocalVariable::getInlinedAt()` field soon.

[1]: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150330/269387.html

Unfortunately, that means it's impossible to keep the current `Verifier`
checks, which rely on comparing `inlinedAt:` fields.  We'll be able to
keep the checks I'm adding here.

If this breaks your out-of-tree testcases, the upgrade script
(add-dbg-to-intrinsics.sh) attached to PR22778 that I used for r235040
might fix them for you.

llvm-svn: 235048
2015-04-15 22:15:46 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
9f52f307c2 Verifier: Check debug info intrinsic arguments
Verify that debug info intrinsic arguments are valid.  (These checks
will not recurse through the full debug info graph, so they don't need
to be cordoned of in `DebugInfoVerifier`.)

With those checks in place, changing the `DbgIntrinsicInst` accessors to
downcast to `MDLocalVariable` and `MDExpression` is natural (added isa
specializations in `Metadata.h` to support this).

Added tests to `test/Verifier` for the new -verify checks, and fixed the
debug info in all the in-tree tests.

If you have out-of-tree testcases that have started to fail to -verify,
hopefully the verify checks are helpful.  The most likely problem is
that the expression argument is `!{}` (instead of `!MDExpression()`).

llvm-svn: 232296
2015-03-15 01:21:30 +00:00