Summary:
Currently, when 't1: i1 = setcc t2, t3, cc' followed by 't4: i1 = xor t1, Constant:i1<-1>' is folded into 't5: i1 = setcc t2, t3 !cc', SDLoc of newly created SDValue 't5' follows SDLoc of 't4', not 't1'. However, as the opcode of newly created SDValue is 'setcc', it make more sense to take DebugLoc from 't1' than 't4'. For the code below
```
extern int bar();
extern int baz();
int foo(int x, int y) {
if (x != y)
return bar();
else
return baz();
}
```
, following is the bitcode representation of 'foo' at the end of llvm-ir level optimization:
```
define i32 @foo(i32 %x, i32 %y) !dbg !4 {
entry:
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %x, i64 0, metadata !9, metadata !11), !dbg !12
tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %y, i64 0, metadata !10, metadata !11), !dbg !13
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %x, %y, !dbg !14
br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else, !dbg !16
if.then: ; preds = %entry
%call = tail call i32 (...) @bar() #3, !dbg !17
br label %return, !dbg !18
if.else: ; preds = %entry
%call1 = tail call i32 (...) @baz() #3, !dbg !19
br label %return, !dbg !20
return: ; preds = %if.else, %if.then
%retval.0 = phi i32 [ %call, %if.then ], [ %call1, %if.else ]
ret i32 %retval.0, !dbg !21
}
!14 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 9, scope: !15)
!16 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 7, scope: !4)
```
As you can see, in 'entry' block, 'icmp' instruction and 'br' instruction have different debug locations. However, with current implementation, there's no distinction between debug locations of these two when they are lowered to asm instructions. This is because 'icmp' and 'br' become 'setcc' 'xor' and 'brcond' in SelectionDAG, where SDLoc of 'setcc' follows the debug location of 'icmp' but SDLOC of 'xor' and 'brcond' follows the debug location of 'br' instruction, and SDLoc of 'xor' overwrites SDLoc of 'setcc' when they are folded. This patch addresses this issue.
Reviewers: atrick, bogner, andreadb, craig.topper, aprantl
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: jlebar, mkuper, jholewinski, andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29813
llvm-svn: 296825
Summary:
Rework the code that was sinking/duplicating (icmp and, 0) sequences
into blocks where they were being used by conditional branches to form
more tbz instructions on AArch64. The new code is more general in that
it just looks for 'and's that have all icmp 0's as users, with a target
hook used to select which subset of 'and' instructions to consider.
This change also enables 'and' sinking for X86, where it is more widely
beneficial than on AArch64.
The 'and' sinking/duplicating code is moved into the optimizeInst phase
of CodeGenPrepare, where it can take advantage of the fact the
OptimizeCmpExpression has already sunk/duplicated any icmps into the
blocks where they are used. One minor complication from this change is
that optimizeLoadExt needed to be updated to always mark 'and's it has
determined should be in the same block as their feeding load in the
InsertedInsts set to avoid an infinite loop of hoisting and sinking the
same 'and'.
This change fixes a regression on X86 in the tsan runtime caused by
moving GVNHoist to a later place in the optimization pipeline (see
PR31382).
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, MatzeB
Subscribers: aemerson, mcrosier, sebpop, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28813
llvm-svn: 295746
