I intend to add further instruction tests to the resources-x86_64.s test file as required, but this initial commit is to help remove a load of unnecessary InstRW overrides in a future patch
llvm-svn: 331108
These instruction don't use their memory operands as normal memory operands. They're just used as addresses. They don't have a size because they aren't directly representing a load or store.
llvm-svn: 331104
Favor the 0x1a encoding for register/register move to match gas.
The instructions used RM and MR in their name along with rr/rm/mr at the end. To make more consistent with other instructions remove the RM/MR and use rr/rm/mr/rr_REV.
Hide the _REV encoding from the assembler but leave it for the disassembler.
llvm-svn: 331101
The invocation of getExact in ScalarEvolution::getBackedgeTakenInfo is used
only for getting statistic and for assert.
Even if statistics is disabled, the code related to it will be eliminated
the invocation to getExact itself will not be eliminated
because it may have side-effects like creation of new SCEVs.
So do invocation only when we collect statistics or executes asserts.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, sanjoy, javed.absar
Reviewed By: javed.absar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46178
llvm-svn: 331099
This commit makes it so that if you outline a def of some register, then the
call instruction created by the outliner actually reflects that the register
is defined by the call. It also makes it so that outlined functions don't
have the TracksLiveness property.
Outlined calls shouldn't break liveness assumptions that someone might make.
This also un-XFAILs the noredzone test, and updates the calls test.
llvm-svn: 331095
The effect of doing so is not disrupting the LoopPassManager when mixing this pass with other loop passes. This should help locality of access substaintially and avoids the cost of computing PostDom.
The assumption here is that the full GuardWidening (which does use PostDom) is run as a canonicalization before loop opts and that this version is just catching cases exposed by other loop passes. (i.e. LoopPredication, IndVarSimplify, LoopUnswitch, etc..)
llvm-svn: 331094
Summary:
D42479 (rL329525) enabled SDIV combine for pow2 non-splat vector
dividers. But when there is a 1 in a vector, the instruction sequence to
be generated involves shifting a value by the number of its bit widths,
which is undefined
(c64f4dbfe3/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (L6000-L6006)).
Especially, in architectures that do not support vector instructions,
each of element in a vector will be computed separately using scalar
operations, and then the resulting value will be undef for '1' values
in a vector.
(All 1's vector is fine; only vectors mixed with 1 and others will be
affected.)
Reviewers: RKSimon, jgravelle-google
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46161
llvm-svn: 331092
Summary:
Previously the flag intrinsics always used the index instructions even if a mask instruction also exists.
To fix fix this I've created a single ISD node type that returns index, mask, and flags. The SelectionDAG CSE process will merge all flavors of intrinsics with the same inputs to a s ingle node. Then during isel we just have to look at which results are used to know what instruction to generate. If both mask and index are used we'll need to emit two instructions. But for all other cases we can emit a single instruction.
Since I had to do manual isel anyway, I've removed the pseudo instructions and custom inserter code that was working around tablegen limitations with multiple implicit defs.
I've also renamed the recently added sse42.ll test case to sttni.ll since it focuses on that subset of the sse4.2 instructions.
Reviewers: chandlerc, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46202
llvm-svn: 331091
For local variables the first DW_OP_deref is consumed by turning the
location kind into a memeory location, but that only makes sense for
values that are in a register to begin with, which cannot happen for
global variables that are attached to a symbol.
rdar://problem/39741860
This reapplies r330970 after fixing an uncovered bug in r331086 and
working around the situation caused by it.
llvm-svn: 331090
Now local value sinking only scans and numbers instructions added
between the current flush point and the last flush point. This ensures
that ISel is overall linear in the size of the BB.
Fixes PR37010 and re-enables local value sinking by default.
llvm-svn: 331087
This patch adds support for fragment expressions
TryToShrinkGlobalToBoolean() which were previously just dropped.
Thanks to Reid Kleckner for providing me a reproducer!
llvm-svn: 331086
Summary:
Currently, we
1. match `LHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `RHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
If that does not match, we swap the `LHS` and `RHS` matchers:
1. match `RHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `LHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
This works ok.
But it complicates writing of commutative matchers, where one would like to match
(`m_Value()`) the value on one side, and use (`m_Specific()`) it on the other side.
This is additionally complicated by the fact that `m_Specific()` stores the `Value *`,
not `Value **`, so it won't work at all out of the box.
The last problem is trivially solved by adding a new `m_c_Specific()` that stores the
`Value **`, not `Value *`. I'm choosing to add a new matcher, not change the existing
one because i guess all the current users are ok with existing behavior,
and this additional pointer indirection may have performance drawbacks.
Also, i'm storing pointer, not reference, because for some mysterious-to-me reason
it did not work with the reference.
The first one appears trivial, too.
Currently, we
1. match `LHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `RHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
If that does not match, we swap the ~~`LHS` and `RHS` matchers~~ **operands**:
1. match ~~`RHS`~~ **`LHS`** matcher to the ~~`first`~~ **`second`** operand of binary operator,
2. and then match ~~`LHS`~~ **`RHS`** matcher to the ~~`second`~ **`first`** operand of binary operator.
Surprisingly, `$ ninja check-llvm` still passes with this.
But i expect the bots will disagree..
The motivational unittest is included.
I'd like to use this in D45664.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, arsenm, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: xbolva00, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45828
llvm-svn: 331085
As suggested in D45842
(although still not sure if we're going to advance that),
we must invalidate references to instructions that have
been recycled (operands were changed, so result is different).
llvm-svn: 331083
Some of the bots were failing in a different way to the others. These were
unable to compare tuples. Fix this by changing to a struct, thereby avoiding
the quirks of tuples.
llvm-svn: 331081
We currently have a hard to solve analysis problem around the order of instructions within a potentially throwing block. We can't cheaply determine whether a given instruction is before the first potential throw in the block. While we're working on that in the background, special case the first instruction within the header.
why this particular special case? Well, headers are guaranteed to execute if the loop does, and it turns out we tend to produce this form in practice.
In a follow on patch, I tend to extend LICM with an alternate approach which works for any instruction in the header before the first throw, but this is the best I can come up with other users of the analysis (such as store promotion.)
Note: I can't show the difference in the analysis result since we're ORing in the expensive instruction walk used by SCEV. Using the full walk is not suitable for a general solution.
llvm-svn: 331079
Summary:
Only allow a single unique .symver alias per symbol. This matches the
behavior of gas. I noticed that we ignored multiple mismatched symver
directives looking at https://reviews.llvm.org/D45798
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson, espindola
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45845
llvm-svn: 331078
Extend the live-in check for all aliased registers so that we can
allow sinking Copy instructions when only implicit def is in successor's
live-in.
llvm-svn: 331072
Summary:
Currently only the memory size is supported but others can be added as
needed.
narrowScalar for G_LOAD and G_STORE now correctly update the
MachineMemOperand and will refuse to legalize atomics since those need more
careful expansions to maintain atomicity.
Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, aemerson, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aemerson
Subscribers: aemerson, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45466
llvm-svn: 331071
The idea is to have a pass which performs the same transformation as GuardWidening, but can be run within a loop pass manager without disrupting the pass manager structure. As demonstrated by the test case, this doesn't quite get there because of issues with post dom, but it gives a good step in the right direction. the motivation is purely to reduce compile time since we can now preserve locality during the loop walk.
This patch only includes a legacy pass. A follow up will add a new style pass as well.
llvm-svn: 331060
These branches were previously unanalyzable and unselectable. Add them and
recognize how to generate their inverses.
Reviewers: smaksimovic, atanasyan, abeserminji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46113
llvm-svn: 331050
Put the first ldp at the end, so that the load-store optimizer can run
and merge the ldp and the add into a post-index ldp.
This didn't work in case no frame was needed and resulted in code size
regressions.
llvm-svn: 331044
Summary:
`HandleLLVMOptions` adds `-w` to the cflags if `LLVM_ENABLE_WARNINGS` is not on.
With `-w`, `check_cxx_compiler_flag` doesn't error out for unsupported flags
(for example `-mcrc` on x86_64), and those flags end up being detected as
working - and really they aren't.
I am not entirely sure what the best way to solve this is, but setting
`LLVM_ENABLE_WARNINGS` prior to including `HandleLLVMOptions` does the job.
Reviewers: phosek, beanz
Reviewed By: phosek
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46079
llvm-svn: 331042
If the MachineInstr uses a custom inserter and is then erased after
instruction selection, there is no use for mapping it to a sched class.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 331040
We currently support LCSSA PHI nodes in the outer loop exit, if their
incoming values do not come from the outer loop latch or if the
outer loop latch has a single predecessor. In that case, the outer loop latch
will be executed only if the inner loop gets executed. If we have multiple
predecessors for the outer loop latch, it may be executed even if the inner
loop does not get executed.
This is a first step to support the case described in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
Reviewers: efriedma, karthikthecool, mcrosier
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43237
llvm-svn: 331037
