When "MBB->Insert(It, ...)" is called, we want It to be pointing inside the
correct basic block. No actual failures at the moment, but it's caused problems
before.
llvm-svn: 221953
What would happen before that commit is that the SDDbgValues associated with
a deallocated SDNode would be marked Invalidated, but SDDbgInfo would keep
a map entry keyed by the SDNode pointer pointing to this list of invalidated
SDDbgNodes. As the memory gets reused, the list might get wrongly associated
with another new SDNode. As the SDDbgValues are cloned when they are transfered,
this can lead to an exponential number of SDDbgValues being produced during
DAGCombine like in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20893
Note that the previous behavior wasn't really buggy as the invalidation made
sure that the SDDbgValues won't be used. This commit can be considered a
memory optimization and as such is really hard to validate in a unit-test.
llvm-svn: 221709
This commit adds a new pass that can inject checks before indirect calls to
make sure that these calls target known locations. It supports three types of
checks and, at compile time, it can take the name of a custom function to call
when an indirect call check fails. The default failure function ignores the
error and continues.
This pass incidentally moves the function JumpInstrTables::transformType from
private to public and makes it static (with a new argument that specifies the
table type to use); this is so that the CFI code can transform function types
at call sites to determine which jump-instruction table to use for the check at
that site.
Also, this removes support for jumptables in ARM, pending further performance
analysis and discussion.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4167
llvm-svn: 221708
This patch improves how the different costs (register, interference, spill
and coalescing) relates together. The assumption is now that:
- coalescing (or any other "side effect" of reg alloc) is negative, and
instead of being derived from a spill cost, they use the block
frequency info.
- spill costs are in the [MinSpillCost:+inf( range
- register or interference costs are in [0.0:MinSpillCost( or +inf
The current MinSpillCost is set to 10.0, which is a random value high
enough that the current constraint builders do not need to worry about
when settings costs. It would however be worth adding a normalization
step for register and interference costs as the last step in the
constraint builder chain to ensure they are not greater than SpillMinCost
(unless this has some sense for some architectures). This would work well
with the current builder pipeline, where all costs are tweaked relatively
to each others, but could grow above MinSpillCost if the pipeline is
deep enough.
The current heuristic is tuned to depend rather on the number of uses of
a live interval rather than a density of uses, as used by the greedy
allocator. This heuristic provides a few percent improvement on a number
of benchmarks (eembc, spec, ...) and will definitely need to change once
spill placement is implemented: the current spill placement is really
ineficient, so making the cost proportionnal to the number of use is a
clear win.
llvm-svn: 221292
It appears to ignore or find ambiguous MachineInstrBuilder's conversion
operators that allow conversion to MachineInstr* and
MachineBasicBlock::bundle_iterator.
As a workaround, add an explicit way to get the MachineInstr.
llvm-svn: 221017
sets as keys into a cache of interference matrice values in the Interference
constraint adder.
Creating interference matrices was one of the large remaining time-sinks in
PBQP. Caching them reduces the total compile time (when using PBQP) on the
nightly test suite by ~10%.
llvm-svn: 220688
Apparently unique_ptr'ifying NodeMetadata exposed an issue in VS where it
occasionally tries to synthesize copy constructors instead of moves. Hopefully
explicitly deleting the copy constructor and defining the move constructor will
fix this.
llvm-svn: 220649
It broke the Windows build:
[1/19] Building CXX object lib\CodeGen\CMakeFiles\LLVMCodeGen.dir\RegAllocPBQP.cpp.obj
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm/CodeGen/RegAllocPBQP.h(132) : error C2248: 'std::unique_ptr<_Ty>::unique_ptr' : cannot access private member declared in class 'std::unique_ptr<_Ty>'
with
[
_Ty=unsigned int []
]
D:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\memory(1600) : see declaration of 'std::unique_ptr<_Ty>::unique_ptr'
with
[
_Ty=unsigned int []
]
This diagnostic occurred in the compiler generated function 'llvm::PBQP::RegAlloc::NodeMetadata::NodeMetadata(const llvm::PBQP::RegAlloc::NodeMetadata &)'
llvm-svn: 220645
No functional change. This just brings things more in-line with coding
standards, and makes ValuePool's functionality clearer (it's not tied to pooling
costs, and we may want to use it to hold other things in the future).
llvm-svn: 220641
Now that we're sure the only root (non-abstract) scope is the current
function scope, there's no need for isCurrentFunctionScope, the property
can be tested directly instead.
llvm-svn: 220451
This enables targets to adapt their pass pipeline to the register
allocator in use. For example, with the AArch64 backend, using PBQP
with the cortex-a57, the FPLoadBalancing pass is no longer necessary.
llvm-svn: 220321
It is just too easy to use a virtual register intead of a NodeId without a
compiler warning. This does not fix the fundamental problem, i.e. both
have the same underlying types, but increases the likelyhood to detect it.
llvm-svn: 220303
This patch removes the PBQPBuilder class and its subclasses and replaces them
with a composable constraints class: PBQPRAConstraint. This allows constraints
that are only required for optimisation (e.g. coalescing, soft pairing) to be
mixed and matched.
This patch also introduces support for target writers to supply custom
constraints for their targets by overriding a TargetSubtargetInfo method:
std::unique_ptr<PBQPRAConstraints> getCustomPBQPConstraints() const;
This patch should have no effect on allocations.
llvm-svn: 219421
In the X86 backend, matching an address is initiated by the 'addr' complex
pattern and its friends. During this process we may reassociate and-of-shift
into shift-of-and (FoldMaskedShiftToScaledMask) to allow folding of the
shift into the scale of the address.
However as demonstrated by the testcase, this can trigger CSE of not only the
shift and the AND which the code is prepared for but also the underlying load
node. In the testcase this node is sitting in the RecordedNode and MatchScope
data structures of the matcher and becomes a deleted node upon CSE. Returning
from the complex pattern function, we try to access it again hitting an assert
because the node is no longer a load even though this was checked before.
Now obviously changing the DAG this late is bending the rules but I think it
makes sense somewhat. Outside of addresses we prefer and-of-shift because it
may lead to smaller immediates (FoldMaskAndShiftToScale is an even better
example because it create a non-canonical node). We currently don't recognize
addresses during DAGCombiner where arguably this canonicalization should be
performed. On the other hand, having this in the matcher allows us to cover
all the cases where an address can be used in an instruction.
I've also talked a little bit to Dan Gohman on llvm-dev who added the RAUW for
the new shift node in FoldMaskedShiftToScaledMask. This RAUW is responsible
for initiating the recursive CSE on users
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-September/076903.html) but it
is not strictly necessary since the shift is hooked into the visited user. Of
course it's safer to keep the DAG consistent at all times (e.g. for accurate
number of uses, etc.).
So rather than changing the fundamentals, I've decided to continue along the
previous patches and detect the CSE. This patch installs a very targeted
DAGUpdateListener for the duration of a complex-pattern match and updates the
matching state accordingly. (Previous patches used HandleSDNode to detect the
CSE but that's not practical here). The listener is only installed on X86.
I tested that there is no measurable overhead due to this while running
through the spec2k BC files with llc. The only thing we pay for is the
creation of the listener. The callback never ever triggers in spec2k since
this is a corner case.
Fixes rdar://problem/18206171
llvm-svn: 219009
in the future to attach useful information about the PBQP graph (e.g. the
associated MachineFunction, pointers to regalloc passes) to the graph itself,
making that information accessible to the solver. This should also allow the
PBQPBuilder interface to be simplified.
llvm-svn: 218848
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
llvm-svn: 218787
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
llvm-svn: 218778
Summary:
The N32/N64 ABI's require that structs passed in registers are laid out
such that spilling the register with 'sd' places the struct at the lowest
address. For little endian this is trivial but for big-endian it requires
that structs are shifted into the upper bits of the register.
We also require that structs passed in registers have the 'inreg'
attribute for big-endian N32/N64 to work correctly. This is because the
tablegen-erated calling convention implementation only has access to the
lowered form of struct arguments (one or more integers of up to 64-bits
each) and is unable to determine the original type.
Reviewers: vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5286
llvm-svn: 218451
With this optimization, we will not always insert zext for values crossing
basic blocks, but insert sext if the users of a value crossing basic block
has preference of sign predicate.
llvm-svn: 218101
