Change `ConstantExpr` to follow the model the other constants are using:
only malloc a replacement if it's going to be used. This fixes a subtle
bug where if an API user had used `ConstantExpr::get()` already to
create the replacement but hadn't given it any users, we'd delete the
replacement.
This relies on r216015 to thread `OnlyIfReduced` through
`ConstantExpr::getWithOperands()`.
llvm-svn: 216016
In order to change `ConstantExpr::replaceUsesOfWithOnConstant()` to work
like other constants (e.g., using `ConstantArray::getImpl()`), thread
`OnlyIfReduced` through as necessary. When `OnlyIfReduced` is false,
there's no functionality change. When it's true, if there's no constant
folding or type changes `nullptr` is returned instead of the new
constant.
`ConstantExpr::replaceUsesOfWithOnConstant()` will be updated to use the
"true" version in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 216015
This reverts commit r215981, which reverted the above commits because
MSVC std::equal asserts on nullptr iterators, and thes commits
introduced an `ArrayRef::equals()` on empty ArrayRefs.
ArrayRef was changed not to use std::equal in r215986.
llvm-svn: 215987
Avoid creating a new `ConstantVector` on an RAUW of one of its members.
This reduces RAUW traffic on any containing constant.
This is part of PR20515.
llvm-svn: 215966
Previously, `ConstantArray::replaceUsesOfWithOnConstant()` neglected to
check whether it becomes a `ConstantDataArray`. Call
`ConstantArray::getImpl()` to check for that.
llvm-svn: 215965
Introduce `getImpl()` that tries the simplification logic from `get()`
and then gives up. This allows the logic to be reused elsewhere in a
follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 215963
Avoid RAUW-ing `ConstantExpr` when an operand changes unless the new
`ConstantExpr` already has users. This prevents the RAUW from rippling
up the expression tree unnecessarily.
This commit indirectly adds test coverage for r215953 (this is how I
came across the bug).
This is part of PR20515.
llvm-svn: 215960
Rewrite `ConstantUniqueMap` to be more similar to
`ConstantAggrUniqueMap`.
- Use a `DenseMap` with custom MapInfo instead of a `std::map` with
linear lookups and deletion.
- Don't waste memory explicitly storing (heavyweight) keys.
Only `ConstantExpr` and `InlineAsm` actually use this data structure, so
I also updated them to use it.
This code cleanup is a precursor to reducing RAUW traffic on
`ConstantExpr` -- I felt badly adding a new (linear) call to
`ConstantUniqueMap::FindExistingKey`, so this designs away the concern.
A follow-up commit will transition the users of `ConstantAggrUniqueMap`
over.
llvm-svn: 215957
While *most* (X sdiv 1) operations will get caught by InstSimplify, it
is still possible for a sdiv to appear in the worklist which hasn't been
simplified yet.
This means that it is possible for 0 - (X sdiv 1) to get transformed
into (X sdiv -1); dividing by -1 can make the transform produce undef
values instead of the proper result.
Sorry for the lack of testcase, it's a bit problematic because it relies
on the exact order of operations in the worklist.
llvm-svn: 215818
We would previously put dllimport variables in switch lookup tables, which
doesn't work because the address cannot be used in a constant initializer.
This is basically the same problem that we have in PR19955.
Putting TLS variables in switch tables also desn't work, because the
address of such a variable is not constant.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4220
llvm-svn: 211331
As a follow-up to r210375 which canonicalizes addrspacecast
instructions, this patch canonicalizes addrspacecast constant
expressions.
Given clang uses ConstantExpr::getAddrSpaceCast to emit addrspacecast
cosntant expressions, this patch is also a step towards having the
frontend emit canonicalized addrspacecasts.
Piggyback a minor refactor in InstCombineCasts.cpp
Update three affected tests in addrspacecast-alias.ll,
access-non-generic.ll and constant-fold-gep.ll and added one new test in
constant-fold-address-space-pointer.ll
llvm-svn: 211004
Given the following C code llvm currently generates suboptimal code for
x86-64:
__m128 bss4( const __m128 *ptr, size_t i, size_t j )
{
float f = ptr[i][j];
return (__m128) { f, f, f, f };
}
=================================================
define <4 x float> @_Z4bss4PKDv4_fmm(<4 x float>* nocapture readonly %ptr, i64 %i, i64 %j) #0 {
%a1 = getelementptr inbounds <4 x float>* %ptr, i64 %i
%a2 = load <4 x float>* %a1, align 16, !tbaa !1
%a3 = trunc i64 %j to i32
%a4 = extractelement <4 x float> %a2, i32 %a3
%a5 = insertelement <4 x float> undef, float %a4, i32 0
%a6 = insertelement <4 x float> %a5, float %a4, i32 1
%a7 = insertelement <4 x float> %a6, float %a4, i32 2
%a8 = insertelement <4 x float> %a7, float %a4, i32 3
ret <4 x float> %a8
}
=================================================
shlq $4, %rsi
addq %rdi, %rsi
movslq %edx, %rax
vbroadcastss (%rsi,%rax,4), %xmm0
retq
=================================================
The movslq is uneeded, but is present because of the trunc to i32 and then
sext back to i64 that the backend adds for vbroadcastss.
We can't remove it because it changes the meaning. The IR that clang
generates is already suboptimal. What clang really should emit is:
%a4 = extractelement <4 x float> %a2, i64 %j
This patch makes that legal. A separate patch will teach clang to do it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3519
llvm-svn: 207801
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction
in the IR.... You see where this is going.
Another step of modularizing the support library.
llvm-svn: 202815
one, but not create one. This is useful in the verifier when we want to
query the constant if it exists but not create one. To be used in an
upcoming commit.
llvm-svn: 199568
A non-constant-foldable static initializer expression containing insertvalue or
extractvalue had been causing an assert:
Constants.cpp:1971: Assertion `FC && "ExtractValue constant expr couldn't be
folded!"' failed.
Now we report a more-sensible "Unsupported expression in static initializer"
error instead.
Fixes PR15417.
llvm-svn: 186044
This pass was assuming that if hasAddressTaken() returns false for a
function, the function's only uses are call sites. That's not true
because there can be references by BlockAddresses too.
Fix the pass to handle this case. Fix
BlockAddress::replaceUsesOfWithOnConstant() to allow a function's type
to be changed by RAUW'ing the function with a bitcast of the recreated
function.
Patch by Mark Seaborn.
llvm-svn: 183933
This is basically the same fix in three different places. We use a set to avoid
walking the whole tree of a big ConstantExprs multiple times.
For example: (select cmp, (add big_expr 1), (add big_expr 2))
We don't want to visit big_expr twice here, it may consist of thousands of
nodes.
The testcase exercises this by creating an insanely large ConstantExprs out of
a loop. It's questionable if the optimizer should ever create those, but this
can be triggered with real C code. Fixes PR15714.
llvm-svn: 179458
we weren't differntiating floating-point zeroinitializers from other zero-initializers)
which was causing problems for code relying upon a + (+0.0f) to, eg, flush denormals to
0. Make the scalar and vector cases have the same behaviour.
llvm-svn: 177279
Previously we tried to infer it from the bit width size, with an added
IsIEEE argument for the PPC/IEEE 128-bit case, which had a default
value. This default value allowed bugs to creep in, where it was
inappropriate.
llvm-svn: 173138
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
llvm-svn: 171359
