on llvmdev: SRoA is introducing MMX datatypes like <1 x i64>,
which then cause random problems because the X86 backend is
producing mmx stuff without inserting proper emms calls.
In the short term, force off MMX datatypes. In the long term,
the X86 backend should not select generic vector types to MMX
registers. This is being worked on, but won't be done in time
for 2.8. rdar://8380055
llvm-svn: 112696
available in normal llvm operators. We aren't going to
use those for MMX any more because it's unsafe for the
optimizers to synthesize new MMX instructions.
llvm-svn: 112685
and output the dwarf line number tables. This takes the current loc info after
an instruction is assembled and saves the needed info into an object that has
vector and for each section. These objects will be used for the final patch to
build and emit the encoded dwarf line number tables. Again for now this is only
in the Mach-O streamer but at some point will move to a more generic place.
llvm-svn: 112668
int x(int t) {
if (t & 256)
return -26;
return 0;
}
We generate this:
tst.w r0, #256
mvn r0, #25
it eq
moveq r0, #0
while gcc generates this:
ands r0, r0, #256
it ne
mvnne r0, #25
bx lr
Scandalous really!
During ISel time, we can look for this particular pattern. One where we have a
"MOVCC" that uses the flag off of a CMPZ that itself is comparing an AND
instruction to 0. Something like this (greatly simplified):
%r0 = ISD::AND ...
ARMISD::CMPZ %r0, 0 @ sets [CPSR]
%r0 = ARMISD::MOVCC 0, -26 @ reads [CPSR]
All we have to do is convert the "ISD::AND" into an "ARM::ANDS" that sets [CPSR]
when it's zero. The zero value will all ready be in the %r0 register and we only
need to change it if the AND wasn't zero. Easy!
llvm-svn: 112664
Reserved registers are unpredictable, and are treated as always live by machine
DCE.
Allocatable registers are never reserved, and can be used for virtual registers.
Unreserved, unallocatable registers can not be used for virtual registers, but
otherwise behave like a normal allocatable register. Most targets only have
the flag register in this set.
llvm-svn: 112649
I have not been able to find a way to test each in isolation, for a few reasons:
1) The ability to look-through non-i1 BinaryOperator's requires the ability to look through non-constant
ICmps in order for it to ever trigger.
2) The ability to do LVI-powered PHI value determination only matters in cases that ProcessBranchOnPHI
can't handle. Since it already handles all the cases without other instructions in the def-use chain
between the PHI and the branch, it requires the ability to look through ICmps and/or BinaryOperators
as well.
llvm-svn: 112611
