Loosen one check from r233446: as long as `DIBuilder` requires a
non-null type for every subprogram, we should allow a null type array.
Also add tests for the rest of `MDSubroutineType`, which were somehow
missing.
llvm-svn: 233468
Add verify checks for `MDType` subclasses and for `MDCompileUnit`.
These new checks don't yet incorporate everything from `Verify()`, but
at least they sanity check the operands. Also downcast accessors as
possible.
A lot of these accessors can't be downcast as far as we'd like because
of arrays of typed objects (stored in a generic `MDTuple`) and
`MDString`-based type references. Eventually I'll port over `DIRef<>`
and `DITypedArray<>` from `DebugInfo.h` to clean those up as well.
Updated bitrotted testcases separately in r233415 and r233443 to reduce
churn on the off-chance this needs to be reverted.
llvm-svn: 233446
Change `LLParser` to require a non-null `scope:` field for both
`MDLocation` and `MDLocalVariable`. There's no need to wait for the
verifier for this check. This also allows their `::getImpl()` methods
to assert that the incoming scope is non-null.
llvm-svn: 233394
Check fields from `MDLocalVariable` and `MDGlobalVariable` and change
the accessors to downcast to the right types. `getType()` still returns
`Metadata*` since it could be an `MDString`-based reference.
Since local variables require non-null scopes, I also updated `LLParser`
to require a `scope:` field.
A number of testcases had grown bitrot and started failing with this
patch; I committed them separately in r233349. If I just broke your
out-of-tree testcases, you're probably hitting similar problems (so have
a look there).
llvm-svn: 233389
This was discussed a while back and I left it optional for migration. Since it's been far more than the 'week or two' that was discussed, time to actually make this manditory.
llvm-svn: 233357
We don't have any logic to emit those tables yet, so the SDAG lowering
of this intrinsic is just a stub. We can see the intrinsic in the
prepared IR, though.
llvm-svn: 233354
Change `getNonCompileUnitScope()` to return `MDScope` and
`getConstantAsMetadata()` to return `ConstantAsMetadata`. This will
make it easier to start requiring more type safety in the debug info
hierarchy.
llvm-svn: 233340
Move all the `MDNode` field helper methods into a new class,
`MDFieldPrinter`, and add helpers for integers, bools, and `DW_*`
symbolic constants. This reduces a ton of code duplication, and makes
it more mechanical to update `AsmWriter` to print broken code in the
context of stricter accessors (like in r233322).
llvm-svn: 233337
Check accessors of `MDLocation`, and change them to `cast<>` down to the
right types. Also add type-safe factory functions.
All the callers that handle broken code need to use the new versions of
the accessors (`getRawScope()` instead of `getScope()`) that still
return `Metadata*`. This is also necessary for things like
`MDNodeKeyImpl<MDLocation>` (in LLVMContextImpl.h) that need to unique
the nodes when their operands might still be forward references of the
wrong type.
In the `Value` hierarchy, consumers that handle broken code use
`getOperand()` directly. However, debug info nodes have a ton of
operands, and their order (even their existence) isn't stable yet. It's
safer and more maintainable to add an explicit "raw" accessor on the
class itself.
llvm-svn: 233322
We don't have any logic to emit those tables yet, so the sdag lowering
of this intrinsic is just a stub. We can see the intrinsic in the
prepared IR, though.
llvm-svn: 233209
Some languages, such as Go, have pre-defined structure types (e.g. "string"
is essentially a pointer/length pair) or pre-defined "typedef" types
(e.g. "error" is essentially a typedef for a specific interface type).
Such types do not have associated source location, so a Go frontend would
be correct not to associate a file name with such types.
This change relaxes the DIType verifier to permit unlocated types with
these tags.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8588
llvm-svn: 233200
The main verifier already recurses through the other entry points, so we
might as well descend here too.
This temporarily duplicates some work already done in
`verifyDebugInfo()`, but eventually I'll be removing the other side.
llvm-svn: 233095
Continue to simplify the `DIDescriptor` subclasses, so that they behave
more like raw pointers. Remove `getRaw()`, replace it with an
overloaded `get()`, and overload the arrow and cast operators. Two
testcases started to crash on the arrow operators with this change
because of `scope:` references that weren't real scopes. I fixed them.
Soon I'll add verifier checks for them too.
This also adds explicit dereference operators. Previously, the builtin
dereference against `operator MDNode *()` would have worked, but now the
builtins are ambiguous.
llvm-svn: 233030
Simplify boolean expressions using `true` and `false` with `clang-tidy`
Patch by Richard Thomson with a few other simplifications to fix
else-after-returns in the surrounding code.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8527
llvm-svn: 233005
A WIP patch makes `DIDescriptor` accessors more strict, which in turn
causes the `DebugInfoFinder` to crash on wrongly typed `!dbg`
attachments. Catch that error up front in
`Verifier::visitInstruction()`.
Also remove a test that we "handle" invalid `!dbg` attachments, added
back in r99938. We don't want to handle those anymore.
Note: I'm *not* recursing and verifying the debug info graph reachable
from this node; that work is already done by `verifyDebugInfo()`.
llvm-svn: 232834
Don't use the accessors in `DIImportedEntity` on a null pointer. (A WIP
patch to make `DIDescriptor` accessors more strict crashes here
otherwise.)
llvm-svn: 232833
Remove the separate `DebugInfoVerifier` class, as a partial step toward
better integrating debug info verification with the `Verifier`.
Right now, verification of debug info is kind of a mess.
- There are `DIDescriptor::Verify()` checks live in `DebugInfo.cpp`.
These return `bool`, and there's no way to see (except by opening a
debugger) why they fail.
- We rely on `DebugInfoFinder` to traverse the debug info graph and
dig up nodes. However, the regular `Verifier` visits many of these
nodes when it calls into debug info intrinsic operands. Visiting
twice and running different checks is kind of absurd.
- Moreover, `DebugInfoFinder` asserts on failed type resolution -- the
verifier should never assert!
By integrating the two verifiers, I'm aiming at solving these problems
(work to be done, obviously). Verification can be localized to the
`Verifier`; we can use a naive `MDNode` operand traversal to find all
the nodes; we can verify type references instead of asserting on
failure.
There are `assert()`s sprinkled throughout the optimizer and dwarf
backend on `DIDescriptor::Verify()` checks. This is a hangover from
when the debug info verifier was off, so I plan to remove them as I go
(once I confirm that the checks are done at verification time).
Note: to keep the behaviour of only running the debug info verifier when
-verify succeeds, I've added an `EverBroken` flag. Once the
`DebugInfoFinder` assertions are gone and the two traversals have been
merged, I expect to be able to remove this.
llvm-svn: 232790
Remove `DebugInfoVerifierLegacyPass` and the `-verify-di` pass.
Instead, call into the `DebugInfoVerifier` from inside
`VerifierLegacyPass::finalizeModule()`. This better matches the logic
in `verifyModule()` (used by the new PassManager), avoids requiring two
separate passes to verify the IR, and makes the API for "add a pass to
verify the IR" simple.
Note: the `-verify-debug-info` flag still works (for now, at least;
eventually it might make sense to just remove it).
llvm-svn: 232772
Summary:
This change splits `makeICmpRegion` into `makeAllowedICmpRegion` and
`makeSatisfyingICmpRegion` with slightly different contracts. The first
one is useful for determining what values some expression //may// take,
given that a certain `icmp` evaluates to true. The second one is useful
for determining what values are guaranteed to //satisfy// a given
`icmp`.
Reviewers: nlewycky
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8345
llvm-svn: 232575
COFF COMDATs (for selection kinds other than 'select any') require at
least one non-section symbol in the symbol table.
Satisfy this by morally enhancing the linkage from private to internal.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8394
llvm-svn: 232570
Break MDExpression off of DebugNode (inherit directly from `MDNode`) and
drop the fake `DW_TAG_expression` tag in the process.
AFAICT, there's no real functionality change here. The tag was
originally used by `DIDescriptor::isExpression()` to discriminate
between `MDNode`s, but in the new hierarchy we don't need that.
Fixes PR22780.
llvm-svn: 232550
r186634 started verifying debug info, and r194986 disabled it by default
because it was too expensive to run the checks on every function (since
most of the graph was reachable from each function).
r206300 moved the checks to module-level to make it cheaper, but there
was already quite a bit of testcase bitrot (and the verifier would only
print `<badref>`) so I guess no one had time to turn it back on.
This does just that. Upgrade scripts this past autumn and winter
probably fixed some of the bitrot, and this weekend I fixed the verifier
output (r232275, r232417, r232418) and thusly the remaining failing
testcases (r232290, r232415).
This is part of PR22777.
llvm-svn: 232505
If `Verifier` has already found a failure, don't call
`DebugInfoVerifier`. The latter sometimes crashes in `DebugInfoFinder`
when the former would give a nice message. The only two cases I found
it crashing are explicit verifier tests I've added:
- test/Verifier/llvm.dbg.declare-expression.ll
- test/Verifier/llvm.dbg.value-expression.ll
However, I assume frontends with bugs will create invalid IR as well.
IMO, the `DebugInfoVerifier` should never crash (instead, it should fail
to verify), but subtleties like that will be easier to work out once
it's enabled again.
This is part of PR22777.
llvm-svn: 232418
Now that we check `MDExpression` during `-verify` (r232299), make
the `DIExpression` wrapper more strict:
- remove redundant checks in `DebugInfoVerifier`,
- overload `get()` to `cast_or_null<MDExpression>` (superseding
`getRaw()`),
- stop checking for null in any accessor, and
- remove `DIExpression::Verify()` entirely in favour of
`MDExpression::isValid()`.
There is still some logic in this class, mostly to do with high-level
iterators; I'll defer cleaning up those until the rest of the wrappers
are similarly strict.
llvm-svn: 232412
Clarify the logic in `DIType::Verify()` by checking `isBasicType()`
earlier, by skipping `else` after `return`s, and by documenting an
otherwise opaque check.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 232410
Turns out `visitIntrinsicFunctionCall()` descends into all operands
already, so explicitly descending in `visitDbgIntrinsic()` (part of
r232296) isn't useful.
Updating a testcase that doesn't really need `-verify-debug-info` (since
r231082) as confirmation.
llvm-svn: 232408
Use an overload instead of a default argument for `Metadata::dump()`.
The latter seems to require calling `dump(nullptr)` explicitly when
using a debugger, where as the former doesn't.
Other than utility for debugging, there's NFC here.
llvm-svn: 232315
Change accessors to downcast to `MDLocalVariable` and `MDExpression`,
now that we have -verify checks in place to confirm that it's safe.
llvm-svn: 232299
Verify that debug info intrinsic arguments are valid. (These checks
will not recurse through the full debug info graph, so they don't need
to be cordoned of in `DebugInfoVerifier`.)
With those checks in place, changing the `DbgIntrinsicInst` accessors to
downcast to `MDLocalVariable` and `MDExpression` is natural (added isa
specializations in `Metadata.h` to support this).
Added tests to `test/Verifier` for the new -verify checks, and fixed the
debug info in all the in-tree tests.
If you have out-of-tree testcases that have started to fail to -verify,
hopefully the verify checks are helpful. The most likely problem is
that the expression argument is `!{}` (instead of `!MDExpression()`).
llvm-svn: 232296
Replumb the `AsmWriter` so that `Metadata::print()` is generally useful.
(Similarly change `Metadata::printAsOperand()`.)
- `SlotTracker` now has a mode where all metadata will be correctly
numbered when initializing a `Module`. Normally, `Metadata` only
referenced from within `Function`s gets numbered when the `Function`
is incorporated.
- `Metadata::print()` and `Metadata::printAsOperand()` (and
`Metadata::dump()`) now take an optional `Module` argument. When
provided, `SlotTracker` is initialized with the new mode, and the
numbering will be complete and consistent for all calls to `print()`.
- `Value::print()` uses the new `SlotTracker` mode when printing
intrinsics with `MDNode` operands, `MetadataAsValue` operands, or the
bodies of functions. Thus, metadata numbering will be consistent
between calls to `Metadata::print()` and `Value::print()`.
- `Metadata::print()` (and `Metadata::dump()`) now print the full
definition of `MDNode`s:
!5 = !{!6, !"abc", !7}
This matches behaviour for `Value::print()`, which includes the name
of instructions.
- Updated call sites in `Verifier` to call `print()` instead of
`printAsOperand()`.
All this, so that `Verifier` can print out useful failure messages that
involve `Metadata` for PR22777.
Note that `Metadata::printAsOperand()` previously took an optional
`bool` and `Module` operand. The former was cargo-culted from
`Value::printAsOperand()` and wasn't doing anything useful. The latter
didn't give consistent results (without the new `SlotTracker` mode).
llvm-svn: 232275
Given that the stated purpose of `CheckFailed()` is to provide a nice
spot for a breakpoint, it'd be nice not to have to use a regex to break
on it. Recover the ability to simply use `b CheckFailed` by
specializing the message-only version, and by changing the variadic
version to call into the message-only version.
llvm-svn: 232268
I'm just going to migrate these in a pretty ad-hoc & incremental way -
providing the backwards compatible API for now, then locally removing
it, fixing a few callers, adding it back in and commiting those callers.
Rinse, repeat.
The assertions should ensure that if I get this wrong we'll find out
about it and not just have one giant patch to revert, recommit, revert,
recommit, etc.
llvm-svn: 232240
