3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Philip Reames	b81ddb9786	[docs] Document our norms around reverts ... This has come up a few times recently, and I was surprised to notice that we don't have anything in the docs. This patch deliberately sticks to stuff that is uncontroversial in the community. Everything herein is thought to be widely agreed to by a large majority of the community. A few things were noted and removed in review which failed this standard, if you spot anything else, please point it out. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305	2021-04-07 21:02:19 -07:00
Mehdi Amini	5e84d47808	Make the post-commit review expectations more explicit with respect to revert ... See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-March/096529.html for context. Reviewed By: silvas, rengolin, echristo, dexonsmith, gribozavr2 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89995	2020-10-28 23:29:29 +00:00
Hal Finkel	7fc69daf0c	High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update ... This is an update to the documentation of our community code-review process. Based on the RFC: High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-November/136808.html). In this patch, I've pulled out the documentation into a separate file, and broken it into a number of subsections. This is, of course, just one further step in better documenting our community processes. I expect we'll continue to improve this over time. Thank you to everyone who provided feedback! Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71916	2020-03-07 04:20:18 +00:00