MC disassembler clients (LLDB) are interested in querying if an
instruction may affect control flow other than by virtue of being
an explicit branch instruction. For example, instructions which
write directly to the PC on some architectures.
llvm-svn: 170610
This provides the same functionality as getRawAllocationOrder() for the
even/odd hints, but without the many constant register arrays.
llvm-svn: 169169
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
registers. Previously, the register we being marked as implicitly defined, but
not killed. In some cases this would cause the register scavenger to spill a
dead register.
Also, use an empty register mask to simplify the logic and to reduce the memory
footprint.
rdar://12592448
llvm-svn: 167499
We use the enums to query whether an Attributes object has that attribute. The
opaque layer is responsible for knowing where that specific attribute is stored.
llvm-svn: 165488
This wasn't the right way to enforce ordering of atomics.
We are already setting the isVolatile bit on memory operands of atomic
operations which is good enough to enforce the correct ordering.
llvm-svn: 162732
It is not safe to use normal LDR instructions because they may be
reordered by the scheduler. The ATOMIC_LDR pseudos have a mayStore flag
that prevents reordering.
Atomic loads are also prevented from participating in rematerialization
and load folding.
llvm-svn: 162713
The getPointerRegClass() hook can return register classes that depend on
the calling convention of the current function (ptr_rc_tailcall).
So far, we have been able to infer the calling convention from the
subtarget alone, but as we add support for multiple calling conventions
per target, that no longer works.
Patch by Yiannis Tsiouris!
llvm-svn: 156328
on X86 Atom. Some of our tests failed because the tail merging part of
the BranchFolding pass was creating new basic blocks which did not
contain live-in information. When the anti-dependency code in the Post-RA
scheduler ran, it would sometimes rename the register containing
the function return value because the fact that the return value was
live-in to the subsequent block had been lost. To fix this, it is necessary
to run the RegisterScavenging code in the BranchFolding pass.
This patch makes sure that the register scavenging code is invoked
in the X86 subtarget only when post-RA scheduling is being done.
Post RA scheduling in the X86 subtarget is only done for Atom.
This patch adds a new function to the TargetRegisterClass to control
whether or not live-ins should be preserved during branch folding.
This is necessary in order for the anti-dependency optimizations done
during the PostRASchedulerList pass to work properly when doing
Post-RA scheduling for the X86 in general and for the Intel Atom in particular.
The patch adds and invokes the new function trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc()
instead of using the existing requiresRegisterScavenging().
It changes BranchFolding.cpp to call trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc() instead of
requiresRegisterScavenging(). It changes the all the targets that
implemented requiresRegisterScavenging() to also implement
trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc().
It adds an assertion in the Post RA scheduler to make sure that post RA
liveness information is available when it is needed.
It changes the X86 break-anti-dependencies test to use –mcpu=atom, in order
to avoid running into the added assertion.
Finally, this patch restores the use of anti-dependency checking
(which was turned off temporarily for the 3.1 release) for
Intel Atom in the Post RA scheduler.
Patch by Andy Zhang!
Thanks to Jakob and Anton for their reviews.
llvm-svn: 155395
ARMBaseRegisterInfo::canRealignStack was checking for variable-sized objects
but not for stack adjustments around calls. Use hasReservedCallFrame() to
check for both. The hasBasePointer function was already correctly checking
both conditions, so the effect of this was that a base pointer would be used
without checking whether the base pointer register could be reserved. I don't
have a small testcase for this.
<rdar://problem/11075906>
llvm-svn: 153110
The fpscr register contains both flags (set by FP operations/comparisons) and
control bits. The control bits (FPSCR) should be reserved, since they're always
available and needn't be defined before use. The flag bits (FPSCR_NZCV) should
like to be unreserved so they can be hoisted by MachineCSE. This fixes PR12165.
llvm-svn: 152076
When an outgoing call takes more than 2k of arguments on the stack, we
don't allocate that call frame in the prolog, but adjust the stack
pointer immediately before the call instead.
This causes problems with the emergency spill slot because PEI can't
track stack pointer adjustments on the second pass, and if the outgoing
arguments are too big, SP can't be used to reach the emergency spill
slot at all.
Work around these problems by ensuring there is a base or frame pointer
that can be used to access the emergency spill slot.
<rdar://problem/10917166>
llvm-svn: 151604
Now that canRealignStack() understands frozen reserved registers, it is
safe to use it for aligned spill instructions.
It will only return true if the registers reserved at the beginning of
register allocation allow for dynamic stack realignment.
<rdar://problem/10625436>
llvm-svn: 147579
Once register allocation has started the reserved registers are frozen.
Fix the ARM canRealignStack() hook to respect the frozen register state.
Now the hook returns false if register allocation was started with frame
pointer elimination enabled.
It also returns false if register allocation started without a reserved
base pointer, and stack realignment would require a base pointer. This
bug was breaking oggenc on armv6.
No test case, an upcoming patch will use this functionality to realign
the stack for spill slots when possible.
llvm-svn: 147578
This patch caused a miscompilation of oggenc because a frame pointer was
suddenly needed halfway through register allocation.
<rdar://problem/10625436>
llvm-svn: 147487
Use the spill slot alignment as well as the local variable alignment to
determine when the stack needs to be realigned. This works now that the
ARM target can always realign the stack by using a base pointer.
Still respect the ARMBaseRegisterInfo::canRealignStack() function
vetoing a realigned stack. Don't use aligned spill code in that case.
llvm-svn: 146997
Use information computed while inferring new register classes to emit
accurate, table-driven implementations of getMatchingSuperRegClass().
Delete the old manual, error-prone implementations in the targets.
llvm-svn: 146873
change, now you need a TargetOptions object to create a TargetMachine. Clang
patch to follow.
One small functionality change in PTX. PTX had commented out the machine
verifier parts in their copy of printAndVerify. That now calls the version in
LLVMTargetMachine. Users of PTX who need verification disabled should rely on
not passing the command-line flag to enable it.
llvm-svn: 145714
ARMII::AddrModeT1_s, we need to take into account that if the frame register is
ARM::SP, then the number of bits is 8. If it's not ARM::SP, then the number of
bits is 5.
llvm-svn: 141529
