down to pass builder in ltobackend.
Currently CodeGenOpts like UnrollLoops/VectorizeLoop/VectorizeSLP in clang
are not passed down to pass builder in ltobackend when new pass manager is
used. This is inconsistent with the behavior when new pass manager is used
and thinlto is not used. Such inconsistency causes slp vectorization pass
not being enabled in ltobackend for O3 + thinlto right now. This patch
fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72386
Avoids the need to include TargetMachine.h from various places just for
an enum. Various other enums live here, such as the optimization level,
TLS model, etc. Data suggests that this change probably doesn't matter,
but it seems nice to have anyway.
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363415
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363328
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
Original llvm-svn: 355964
llvm-svn: 355984
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
Current PGO profile counts are not context sensitive. The branch probabilities
for the inlined functions are kept the same for all call-sites, and they might
be very different from the actual branch probabilities. These suboptimal
profiles can greatly affect some downstream optimizations, in particular for
the machine basic block placement optimization.
In this patch, we propose to have a post-inline PGO instrumentation/use pass,
which we called Context Sensitive PGO (CSPGO). For the users who want the best
possible performance, they can perform a second round of PGO instrument/use on
the top of the regular PGO. They will have two sets of profile counts. The
first pass profile will be manly for inline, indirect-call promotion, and
CGSCC simplification pass optimizations. The second pass profile is for
post-inline optimizations and code-gen optimizations.
A typical usage:
// Regular PGO instrumentation and generate pass1 profile.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-generate source.c -o gen
> ./gen
> llvm-profdata merge default.*profraw -o pass1.profdata
// CSPGO instrumentation.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-use=pass1.profdata -fcs-profile-generate -o gen2
> ./gen2
// Merge two sets of profiles
> llvm-profdata merge default.*profraw pass1.profdata -o profile.profdata
// Use the combined profile. Pass manager will invoke two PGO use passes.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-use=profile.profdata -o use
This change touches many components in the compiler. The reviewed patch
(D54175) will committed in phrases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54175
llvm-svn: 354930
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Sometimes it's useful to emit assembly after LTO stage to modify it manually. Emitting precodegen bitcode file (via save-temps plugin option) and then feeding it to llc doesn't always give the same binary as original.
This patch is simpler alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D24020.
Patch by Denis Bakhvalov.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: MaskRay, inglorion, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56114
llvm-svn: 350276
Summary:
This function is very similar to add_llvm_library(), so this patch merges it
into add_llvm_library() and replaces all calls to add_llvm_loadable_module(lib ...)
with add_llvm_library(lib MODULE ...)
Reviewers: philip.pfaffe, beanz, chandlerc
Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe
Subscribers: chapuni, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51748
llvm-svn: 349839
Summary:
r336838 allowed these to be toggleable.
r336858 reverted r336838.
r336943 made the generation of these sections conditional on LDPO_REL.
This commit brings back the toggle-ability. You can specify:
-plugin-opt=-function-sections
-plugin-opt=-data-sections
For your linker flags to disable the changes made in r336943.
Without toggling r336943 off, arm64 linux kernels linked with gold-plugin
see significant boot time regressions, but with r336943 outright reverted
x86_64 linux kernels linked with gold-plugin fail to boot.
Reviewers: pcc, void
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55291
llvm-svn: 348389
Summary: This is to be consistent with lld behavior since rLLD340364.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: steven_wu, eraman, mehdi_amini, inglorion, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51060
llvm-svn: 340380
Not all programs want section ordering when compiled with LTO.
In particular, the Linux kernel is very sensitive when it comes to linking, and
doesn't boot when each function is placed in its own sections.
Reviewed By: pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48756
llvm-svn: 336943
Some programs (e.g. Linux) aren't able to handle function/data sections when
LTO is used. Thus they need a way to disable it. That can be done with these
plugin options:
-plugin-opt=-function-sections=0
-plugin-opt=-data-sections=0
llvm-svn: 336838
I don't know how to build this code, but based on the failing
buildbot error message it looks like this change should get
the buildbot up and running again.
llvm-svn: 334231
With the upcoming patch to add summary parsing support, IsAnalysis would
be true in contexts where we are not performing module summary analysis.
Rename to the more specific and approprate HaveGVs, which is essentially
what this flag is indicating.
llvm-svn: 334140
This patch adds a StatsFile option to LTO/Config.h and updates both
LLVMGold and llvm-lto2 to set it.
Reviewers: MatzeB, tejohnson, espindola
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45531
llvm-svn: 330411
Summary:
Instead of manually invoking PrintStatistics, simply invoke
llvm_shutdown which will take care of destroying managed statics, and as
a side effect will destroy the StatisticInfo ManagedStatic, invoking
PrintStatistics when needed.
Reviewers: fhahn
Subscribers: inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45820
llvm-svn: 330341
Summary: This enables debug fission on implicit ThinLTO when linked with gold. It will put the .dwo files in a directory specified by user.
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc, dblaikie
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, mehdi_amini, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44792
llvm-svn: 329988
These aren't the .def style files used in LLVM that require a macro
defined before their inclusion - they're just basic non-modular includes
to stamp out command line flag variables.
llvm-svn: 329840
It was reported that this change measurably regressed -plugin-opt=O3
performance.
There is an ongoing discussion on llvm-dev about the correct way to
set the CG opt level, see thread "[llvm-dev] [RFC] Adding function
attributes to represent codegen optimization level".
llvm-svn: 329458
Summary:
(Restores r327459 with handling for old plugin-api.h)
Utilize new gold plugin api interface for obtaining --wrap option
arguments, and LTO API handling (added for --wrap support in lld LTO),
to mark symbols so that LTO does not optimize them inappropriately.
Note the test cases will be in a new gold test subdirectory that
is dependent on the next release of gold which will contain the new
interfaces.
Reviewers: pcc, tmsriram
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44235
llvm-svn: 327506
Summary:
Utilize new gold plugin api interface for obtaining --wrap option
arguments, and LTO API handling (added for --wrap support in lld LTO),
to mark symbols so that LTO does not optimize them inappropriately.
Note the test cases will be in a new gold test subdirectory that
is dependent on the next release of gold which will contain the new
interfaces.
Reviewers: pcc, tmsriram
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44235
llvm-svn: 327459
Summary:
As pointed out in the review for D37993, for consistency with other
linkers, gold plugin should perform cache pruning whenever there is a
cache directory specified, which will use the default cache policy.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43389
llvm-svn: 325830
Summary:
ThinLTO indexing may decide to skip all objects. If we don't write something to
the list build system may consider this as failure or linker can reuse a file
from the previews build.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43415
llvm-svn: 325819
Summary:
With D43396, no clients use the Path parameter anymore.
Depends on D43396.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43400
llvm-svn: 325619
Summary:
This will avoid the race condition described in the review for D37993.
I believe that the Path parameter to AddBufferFn is no longer utilized.
I would prefer to remove that as a follow up clean up patch to reduce
the diffs in this patch.
Reviewers: pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43396
llvm-svn: 325618
Summary:
Gold plugin does not add pass to ThinLTO modules without useful symbols.
In this case ThinLTO can't create corresponding index file and some features, like CFI,
cannot be processes by backed correctly without index.
Given that we don't need the backed output we can request it to avoid
processing the module. This is implemented by this patch using new
"SkipModuleByDistributedBackend" flag.
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42995
llvm-svn: 325411
The LTO opt level should not affect the codegen opt level, and indeed
it does not affect it in lld. Ideally the codegen opt level should
be controlled by an IR-level attribute based on the compile-time opt
level, but that hasn't been implemented yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43040
llvm-svn: 324557
Summary: ThinLTO may skip object for other reasons, e.g. if there is no summary.
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42514
llvm-svn: 323818
