Don't assume the alias of a defined reg is always already in the set.
As the test case in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36587 discovered,
it is wrong to assume that all the aliases of the defined register in the
*current function* is already present in the UsedPhysRegsMask.
This patch changes this so that any definition in the current function of a
phys-reg always results in all its aliases inserted into the set of defined
registers.
Review: Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45157
llvm-svn: 331509
Summary:
This addresses http://llvm.org/PR36790.
The change Deprecates a number of functions and types in
`include/xray/xray_log_interface.h` to recommend using string-based
configuration of XRay through the __xray_log_init_mode(...) function. In
particular, this deprecates the following:
- `__xray_set_log_impl(...)` -- users should instead use the
`__xray_log_register_mode(...)` and `__xray_log_select_mode(...)` APIs.
- `__xray_log_init(...)` -- users should instead use the
`__xray_log_init_mode(...)` function, which also requires using the
`__xray_log_register_mode(...)` and `__xray_log_select_mode(...)`
functionality.
- `__xray::FDRLoggingOptions` -- in following patches, we'll be
migrating the FDR logging implementations (and tests) to use the
string-based configuration. In later stages we'll remove the
`__xray::FDRLoggingOptions` type, and ask users to migrate to using the
string-based configuration mechanism instead.
- `__xray::BasicLoggingOptions` -- same as `__xray::FDRLoggingOptions`,
we'll be removing this type later and instead rely exclusively on the
string-based configuration API.
We also update the documentation to reflect the new advice and remove
some of the deprecated notes.
Reviewers: eizan, kpw, echristo, pelikan
Reviewed By: kpw
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46173
llvm-svn: 331503
Summary:
Using a set is unnecessary here an in some cases (see e.g. PR37277)
takes significant amount of time to just insert values into it. In this
particular case all we need is just to check if we find the block we are
looking for or not.
Reviewers: davide
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46411
llvm-svn: 331502
Two of these are immediately dereferenced on the next line. The other two are passed immediately to the IRBuilder constructor which can't handle a nullptr.
llvm-svn: 331500
These are casts on users of a PHINode to Instruction. I think since PHINode is an Instruction any users would also be Instructions. At least a cast will give us an assertion if its wrong.
llvm-svn: 331498
We currently recognize this idiom where x is signed and thus the shift in an ashr.
int cnt = 0;
while (x) {
x >>= 1; // arithmetic shift right
++cnt;
}
and turn it into (bitwidth - ctlz(x)). And if there is anything else in the loop we will create a new loop that runs that many times.
If x is initially negative, the shift result will never be 0 and thus the loop is infinite. If you put something with side effects in the loop, that side effect will now only happen bitwidth times instead of an infinite number of times.
So this transform is only safe for logical shift right (which we don't currently recognize) or if we can prove that x cannot be negative before the loop.
llvm-svn: 331493
Summary:
This makes is possible to have R600RegisterInfo and SIRegisterInfo
not inherit from AMDGPURegisterInfo.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, llvm-commits, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46280
llvm-svn: 331490
The RWMutex implementation depends on config.h macros (specifically
HAVE_PTHREAD_H and HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INIT), so we need to be
including it and not just llvm-config.h here or we fall back to a much
slower implementation.
llvm-svn: 331487
Add logic for the special case when a cmp+select can clearly be
reduced to just a bitwise logic instruction, and remove an
over-reaching chunk of general purpose bit magic. The primary goal
is to remove cases where we are not improving the IR instruction
count when doing these select transforms, and in all cases here that
is true.
In the motivating 3-way compare tests, there are further improvements
because we can combine/propagate select values (not sure if that
belongs in instcombine, but it's there for now).
DAGCombiner has folds to turn some of these selects into bit magic,
so there should be no difference in the end result in those cases.
Not all constant combinations are handled there yet, however, so it
is possible that some targets will see more cmov/csel codegen with
this change in IR canonicalization.
Ideally, we'll go further to *not* turn selects into multiple
logic/math ops in instcombine, and we'll canonicalize to selects.
But we should make sure that this step does not result in regressions
first (and if it does, we should fix those in the backend).
The general direction for this change was discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105373.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/114885.html
Alive proofs for the new bit magic:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/XG7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46086
llvm-svn: 331486
Summary:
constrainOperandRegClass() currently fails if it tries to constrain the
register class of an operand that is defeined with an unallocatable register
class. This patch resolves this by adding a target callback to compute
register constriants in this case.
This is required by the AMDGPU because many of its instructions have source opreands
defined with the unallocatable register classe VS_32 which is a union of two allocatable
register classes VGPR_32 and SReg_32.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, tpr, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45991
llvm-svn: 331485
Summary:
Support was added to the regular LTO backend, but not thinBackend.
This patch adds that support.
Reviewers: pcc, davide
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46376
llvm-svn: 331481
We can't see all of the problems currently unless
we look at debug output when the global 'unsafe' is
on. It's a mess. This is another attempt to make
sure that D45710 is not making changes unintentionally.
llvm-svn: 331476
This took a bit of extra work as on Intel targets the old (V)PSLLDrr/(V)PSLLDrm style instructions act differently - I ended up creating WriteVecShiftImm classes for XMM/YMM/ZMM vector shift by immediate and retaining WriteVecShift as the default (used only by MMX) plus WriteVecShiftX/WriteVecShiftY. X86SchedWriteWidths hides most of this thank goodness.
llvm-svn: 331472
I'm choosing PPC out of convenience because it does
all of the transforms of interest in these tests by
default. There are multiple FMF problems shown in the
current checks. D45710 is proposing to fix part of
that.
llvm-svn: 331471
Summary:
When we create a fragment expression, and there already is an
old fragment expression, we assert that the new fragment is
within the range for the old fragment.
If for example the old fragment expression says that we
describe bit 10-16 of a variable (Offset=10, Size=6),
and we now want to create a new fragment expression only
describing bit 3-6 of the original value, then the resulting
fragment expression should have Offset=13, Size=3.
The assert is supposed to catch if the resulting fragment
expression is outside the range for the old fragment. However,
it used to verify that the Offset+Size of the new fragment was
smaller or equal than Offset+Size for the old fragment. What
we really want to check is that Offset+Size of the new fragment
is smaller than the Size of the old fragment.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46391
llvm-svn: 331465
Summary:
This reverts SVN r331441 (reapplies r331337), together with a fix
in to handle an already existing fragment expression in the
dbg.value that must be fragmented due to a split PHI node.
This should solve the problem seen in PR37321, which was the
reason for the revert of r331337.
The situation in PR37321 is that we have a PHI node like this
%u.sroa = phi i80 [ %u.sroa.x, %if.x ],
[ %u.sroa.y, %if.y ],
[ %u.sroa.z, %if.z ]
and a dbg.value like this
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i80 %u.sroa,
metadata !13,
metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 80))
The phi node is split into three 32-bit PHI nodes
%30:gr32 = PHI %11:gr32, %bb.4, %14:gr32, %bb.5, %27:gr32, %bb.8
%31:gr32 = PHI %12:gr32, %bb.4, %15:gr32, %bb.5, %28:gr32, %bb.8
%32:gr32 = PHI %13:gr32, %bb.4, %16:gr32, %bb.5, %29:gr32, %bb.8
but since the original value only is 80 bits we need to adjust the size
of the last fragment expression, and with this patch we get
DBG_VALUE debug-use %30:gr32, debug-use $noreg, !"u", !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32)
DBG_VALUE debug-use %31:gr32, debug-use $noreg, !"u", !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 32)
DBG_VALUE debug-use %32:gr32, debug-use $noreg, !"u", !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 64, 16)
Reviewers: vsk, aprantl, mstorsjo
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46384
llvm-svn: 331464
These tests are for DAGCombiner::foldSelectCCToShiftAnd().
Right now, they were only tested for AArch64,
but given the upcoming X86 changes to the hasAndNot(),
the test coverage needs to be added.
These tests originated from D27489 / rL289738
llvm-svn: 331454
By default LLVM thinks very large vectors get aligned to their size when
passed across functions. Unfortunately no-one told the ARM backend so it
doesn't trigger stack realignment and so accesses can cause the usual
misalignment issues (e.g. a data abort).
This changes the ABI alignment to the stack alignment, which in practice
(and as a bonus) also coincides with the alignment "natural" vectors get.
llvm-svn: 331451
Also retagged VDBPSADBW instructions as SchedWritePSADBW instead of SchedWriteVecIMul which matches the behaviour on SkylakeServer (the only thing that supports it...)
llvm-svn: 331445
The code fails to check that the same value is used twice. We only make sure the left hand side of the and is part of the loop recurrence. The 'x' in the subtract can be any value.
llvm-svn: 331436
Add overloads for `__len__` and `__getitem__` to allow use of this class
on Linux as well as Windows. With these overloads, lit can be used on
both hosts for the swift testsuite.
llvm-svn: 331431
This patch was temporarily reverted because it has exposed bug 37229 on
PowerPC platform. The bug is unrelated to the patch and was just a general
bug in the optimization done for PowerPC platform only. The bug was fixed
by the patch rL331410.
This patch returns the disabled commit since the bug was fixed.
llvm-svn: 331427
These are necessary changes to support building LLVM for Fuchsia.
While these are not sufficient to run on Fuchsia, they are still
useful when cross-compiling LLVM libraries and runtimes for Fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46345
llvm-svn: 331423
Summary:
Machine Instruction flags for fast math support and MIR print support
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45781
llvm-svn: 331417
Sinking the and closer to a compare against zero is beneficial on PPC as it
allows us to emit record-form instructions. In the future, we may expand this
to a larger set of operations that feed compares against zero since PPC has
lots of record-form instructions.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46060
llvm-svn: 331416
This code previously existed only in MCMachOStreamer but is
useful for WebAssembly too. See: D46335
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46297
llvm-svn: 331412
The CTR loops pass will insert the decrementing branch instruction in an exiting
block for the loop being transformed. However if that block is part of another
loop as well (whether a nested loop or with irreducible CFG), it is not valid
to use that exiting block. In fact, if the loop hass irreducible CFG, we don't
bother analyzing it and we just bail on the transformation. In practice, this
doesn't lead to a noticeable reduction in the number of loops transformed by
this pass.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37229
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46162
llvm-svn: 331410
Summary:
Prior to this change, LLVM would in some cases emit *massive* writeout
functions with many 10s of 1000s of function calls in straight-line
code. This is a very wasteful way to represent what are fundamentally
loops and creates a number of scalability issues. Among other things,
register allocating these calls is extremely expensive. While D46127 makes this
less severe, we'll still run into scaling issues with this eventually. If not
in the compile time, just from the code size.
Now the pass builds up global data structures modeling the inputs to
these functions, and simply loops over the data structures calling the
relevant functions with those values. This ensures that the code size is
a fixed and only data size grows with larger amounts of coverage data.
A trivial change to IRBuilder is included to make it easier to build
the constants that make up the global data.
Reviewers: wmi, echristo
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46357
llvm-svn: 331407
