dsymutil needs access to DWARF specific inforamtion, the small DIContext
wrapper isn't sufficient. Other DWARF consumers might want to use it too
(I'm looking at you lldb).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6694
llvm-svn: 224594
A DWARFUnitSection is the collection of Units that have been extracted from
the same debug section.
By embeding a reference to their DWARFUnitSection in each unit, the DIEs
will be able to resolve inter-unit references by interrogating their Unit's
DWARFUnitSection.
This is a minimal patch where the DWARFUnitSection is-a SmallVector of Units,
thus exposing exactly the same interface as before. Followup-up patches might
change from inheritance to composition in order to expose only the wanted
DWARFUnitSection abstraction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5310
llvm-svn: 217747
The DWARFContext will be used to pass global 'context' down, like
pointers to related debug info sections or command line options.
The first use will be for the debug_info dumper to be able to access
other debug info section to dump eg. Location Expression inline
in the debug_info dump.
llvm-svn: 217128
Owning the buffer is somewhat inflexible. Some Binaries have sub Binaries
(like Archive) and we had to create dummy buffers just to handle that. It is
also a bad fit for IRObjectFile where the Module wants to own the buffer too.
Keeping this ownership would make supporting IR inside native objects
particularly painful.
This patch focuses in lib/Object. If something elsewhere used to own an Binary,
now it also owns a MemoryBuffer.
This patch introduces a few new types.
* MemoryBufferRef. This is just a pair of StringRefs for the data and name.
This is to MemoryBuffer as StringRef is to std::string.
* OwningBinary. A combination of Binary and a MemoryBuffer. This is needed
for convenience functions that take a filename and return both the
buffer and the Binary using that buffer.
The C api now uses OwningBinary to avoid any change in semantics. I will start
a new thread to see if we want to change it and how.
llvm-svn: 216002
Turns out that DW_AT_ranges_base attribute sets the offset for
DW_AT_ranges values specified in the .dwo file, but not for DW_AT_ranges specified
in the skeleton compile unit DIE in the main executable. This is extremely confusing,
and would hopefully be fixed in DWARF-5 when it's finalized. For now this
behavior makes sense, as otherwise Fission would break DWARF consumers who
doesn't know anything about DW_AT_ranges_base.
llvm-svn: 210809
DIE doesn't need to store a pointer to its parent: we can traverse the DIE tree
only with functions getFirstChild() and getSibling(). Parents must be known
only when we construct the tree. Rewrite setDIERelations() procedure in a more
straightforward way, and get rid of lots of now unused DIEMinimal methods.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 207563
When address ranges for compile unit are specified in compile unit DIE
itself, there is no need to collect ranges from children subprogram DIEs.
This change speeds up llvm-symbolizer on Clang-produced binaries with
full debug info. For instance, symbolizing a first address in a 1Gb binary
is now 2x faster (1s vs. 2s).
llvm-svn: 206641
Add a helper method to get address ranges specified in a DIE
(either by DW_AT_low_pc/DW_AT_high_pc, or by DW_AT_ranges). Use it
to untangle and simplify the code.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 206624
Summary:
Use DWARF4 table of form classes to fetch attributes from DIE
in a more consistent way. This shouldn't change the functionality and
serves as a refactoring for upcoming change: DW_AT_high_pc has different
semantics depending on its form class.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
CC: echristo, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1961
llvm-svn: 193553
