In some cases, we can negate instruction if only one of it's operands
negates. Previously, we assumed that constants would have been
canonicalized to RHS already, but that isn't guaranteed to happen,
because of InstCombine worklist visitation order,
as the added test (previously-hanging) shows.
So if we only need to negate a single operand,
we should ensure ourselves that we try constant operand first.
Do that by re-doing the complexity sorting ourselves,
when we actually care about it.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47752
And another step towards transformss not introducing inttoptr and/or
ptrtoint casts that weren't there already.
In this case, when load/store uses have conflicting types,
instead of falling back to the iN, we can try to use allocated sub-type.
As disscussed, this isn't the best idea overall (we shouldn't rely on
allocated type), but it works fine as a temporary measure.
I've measured, and @ `-O3` as of vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed,
this results in +0.05% more bitcasts, -5.51% less inttoptr
and -1.05% less ptrtoint (at the end of middle-end opt pipeline)
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47592
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88788
The old function attribute deduction pass ignores reads of constant
memory and we need to copy this behavior to replace the pass completely.
First step are constant globals. TBAA can also describe constant
accesses and there are other possibilities. We might want to consider
asking the alias analyses that are available but for now this is simpler
and cheaper.
If the function is not assumed `noreturn` we should not wait for an
update to mark the call site as "may-return".
This has two kinds of consequences:
- We have less iterations in many tests.
- We have less deductions based on "known information" (since we ask
earlier, point 1, and therefore assumed information is not "known"
yet).
The latter is an artifact that we might want to tackle properly at some
point but which is not easily fixable right now.
The call slot optimization has some home-grown code for checking
whether the destination is dereferenceable. Replace this with the
generic isDereferenceableAndAlignedPointer() helper.
I'm not checking alignment here, because that is currently handled
separately and may be an enforced alignment for allocas. The clean
way of integrating that part would probably be to accept a callback
in isDereferenceableAndAlignedPointer() for the actual isAligned check,
which would then have a chance to use an enforced alignment instead.
This allows the destination to be a GEP (among other things), though
the two open TODOs may prevent it from working in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88805
When performing call slot optimization for a non-local destination,
we need to check whether there may be throwing calls between the
call and the copy. Otherwise, the early write to the destination
may be observable by the caller.
This was already done for call slot optimization of load/store,
but not for memcpys. For the sake of clarity, I'm moving this check
into the common optimization function, even if that does need an
additional instruction scan for the load/store case.
As efriedma pointed out, this check is not sufficient due to
potential accesses from another thread. This case is left as a TODO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88799
When we assume a return value is dead we might still visit return
instructions via `Attributor::checkForAllReturnedValuesAndReturnInsts(..)`.
When we do so the "returned value" is potentially simplified to `undef`
as it is the assumed "returned value". This is a problem if there was a
preexisting `noundef` attribute that will only be removed as we manifest
the `undef` return value. We should not use this combination to derive
`unreachable` though. Two test cases fixed.
In AAMemoryBehaviorFloating we used to track benign uses in a SetVector.
With this change we look through benign uses eagerly to reduce the
number of elements (=Uses) we look at during an update.
The test does actually not fail prior to this commit but I already wrote
it so I kept it.
We know V is a IntToPtrInst or PtrToIntInst type so we know its a CastInst - so use cast<> directly.
Prevents clang static analyzer warning that we could deference a null pointer.
This still only gets used for scalar types but now always uses ConstantExpr in preparation for vector support - it was using APInt methods in some places.
Use context to prove that load can be safely executed at a point where load is being hoisted.
Postpone the decision about safety of speculative load execution till the moment we know
where we hoist load and check safety at that context.
Reviewers: nikic, fhahn, mkazantsev, lebedev.ri, efriedma, reames
Reviewed By: reames, mkazantsev
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88725
This reverts commit 20797989ea190f2ef22d13c5a7a0535fe9afa58b.
This patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D69257) cannot complete a stage2
build due to the change:
```
CI->getCalledFunction()->getName().contains("longjmp")
```
There are several concrete issues here:
- The callee may not be a function, so `getCalledFunction` can assert.
- The called value may not have a name, so `getName` can assert.
- There's no distinction made between "my_longjmp_test_helper" and the
actual longjmp libcall.
At a higher level, there's a serious layering problem here. The
splitting pass makes policy decisions in a general way (e.g. based on
attributes or profile data). Special-casing certain names breaks the
layering. It subverts the work of library maintainers (who may now need
to opt-out of unexpected optimization behavior for any affected
functions) and can lead to inconsistent optimization behavior (as not
all llvm passes special-case ".*longjmp.*" in the same way).
The patch may need significant revision to address these issues.
But the immediate issue is that this crashes while compiling llvm's unit
tests in a stage2 build (due to the `getName` problem).
(it was introduced in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-January/080956.html)
This canonicalization seems dubious.
Most importantly, while it does not create `inttoptr` casts by itself,
it may cause them to appear later, see e.g. D88788.
I think it's pretty obvious that it is an undesirable outcome,
by now we've established that seemingly no-op `inttoptr`/`ptrtoint` casts
are not no-op, and are no longer eager to look past them.
Which e.g. means that given
```
%a = load i32
%b = inttoptr %a
%c = inttoptr %a
```
we likely won't be able to tell that `%b` and `%c` is the same thing.
As we can see in D88789 / D88788 / D88806 / D75505,
we can't really teach SCEV about this (not without the https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47592 at least)
And we can't recover the situation post-inlining in instcombine.
So it really does look like this fold is actively breaking
otherwise-good IR, in a way that is not recoverable.
And that means, this fold isn't helpful in exposing the passes
that are otherwise unaware of these patterns it produces.
Thusly, i propose to simply not perform such a canonicalization.
The original motivational RFC does not state what larger problem
that canonicalization was trying to solve, so i'm not sure
how this plays out in the larger picture.
On vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed, this results in
increase of asm instructions and final object size by ~+0.05%
decreases final count of bitcasts by -4.79% (-28990),
ptrtoint casts by -15.41% (-3423),
and of inttoptr casts by -25.59% (-6919, *sic*).
Overall, there's -0.04% less IR blocks, -0.39% instructions.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47592
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88789
... by using MapVector. The issue was caused by 63182c2ac0b643a60d397274e8a31166fc7243fa.
Also use stable_partition instead of partition to get stable results
across different STL implementations.
When retrying the "simplify with operand replaced" select
optimization without poison flags, also handle inbounds on GEPs.
Of course, this particular example would also be safe to transform
while keeping inbounds, but the underlying machinery does not
know this (yet).
Use m_Specific instead of m_Value followed by an equality check - we already do this for the similar folds above, it looks like an oversight in rG2b459fe7e1e where the original pattern match code looked a little different.
This reverts commit a3caf7f6102dc863425f9714b099af58397f0cd2.
The ReleaseLTO-g test-suite configuration has been failing
to build since this commit, because clang segfaults while
building 7zip.
Update the code responsible for deleting VPBBs and recipes to properly
update users and release operands.
This is another preparation for D84680 & following patches towards
enabling modeling def-use chains in VPlan.
Use SCEV to salvage additional @llvm.dbg.value that have turned into
referencing undef after transformation (and traditional
salvageDebugInfo). Before transformation compute SCEV for each
@llvm.dbg.value in the loop body and store it (along side its current
DIExpression). After transformation update those @llvm.dbg.value now
referencing undef by comparing its stored SCEV to the SCEV of the
current loop-header PHI-nodes. Allow match with offset by inserting
compensation code in the DIExpression.
Fixes : PR38815
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87494
This adds a helper to convert a VPRecipeBase pointer to a VPUser, for
recipes that inherit from VPUser. Once VPRecipeBase directly inherits
from VPUser this helper can be removed.
When updating operands of a VPUser, we also have to adjust the list of
users for the new and old VPValues. This is required once we start
transitioning recipes to become VPValues.
Do not instrument user-defined ELF sections (whose names resemble valid
C identifiers). They may have special use semantics and modifying them
may break programs. This is e.g. the case with NetBSD __link_set API
that expects these sections to store consecutive array elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76665
Add basic vector handling to recognizeBSwapOrBitReverseIdiom/collectBitParts - this works at the element level, all vector element operations must match (splat constants etc.) and there is no cross-element support (insert/extract/shuffle etc.).
If we're bswap'ing some bytes and zero'ing the remainder we can perform this as a bswap+mask which helps us match 'partial' bswaps as a first step towards folding into a more complex bswap pattern.
Reapplied with early-out if recognizeBSwapOrBitReverseIdiom collects a source wider than the result type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88578
Next to erasing the instruction, we also always want to remove
it from MSSA and MD. Use a common function to do so.
This is a refactoring split out from D26739.
The removal of the cpy instruction is left to the caller of
performCallSlotOptzn(), including the invalidation of MD. Both
call-sites already do this.
Also handle incrementation of NumMemCpyInstr consistently at the
call-site. One of the call-site was already doing this, which
ended up incrementing the statistic twice.
This fix was part of D26739.
While looping through all args or all return values, we may mark a use
of a later iteration as live. Previously when we got to that later value
it would ignore that and continue adding to Uses instead of marking it
live. For example, when looping through arg#0 and arg#1,
MarkValue(arg#0, Live) may cause some use of arg#1 to be live, but
MarkValue(arg#1, MaybeLive) will not notice that and continue adding
into Uses.
Now MarkValue(RA, MaybeLive) will MarkLive(RA) if any use is live.
Fixes PR47444.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88529
