t2LDRpci with t2LDRi12.
There are a couple of problems with this.
1. The encoding for the literal and immediate constant are different.
Note bit 7 of the literal case is 'U' so it can be negative.
2. t2LDRi12 is now narrowed to tLDRpci before constant island pass is run.
So we end up never using the Thumb2 instruction, which ends up creating a
lot more constant islands.
llvm-svn: 125074
parsing of operands introduced in r125030. As a small note, besides using a more
generic approach we can also have more descriptive output when debugging
llvm-mc, example:
mcr p7, #1, r5, c1, c1, #4
note: parsed instruction:
['mcr', <ARMCC::al>,
<coprocessor number: 7>,
1,
<register 73>,
<coprocessor register: 1>,
<coprocessor register: 1>,
4]
llvm-svn: 125052
The vld1-lane, vld1-dup and vst1-lane instructions do not yet support using
post-increment versions, but all the rest of the NEON load/store instructions
should be handled now.
llvm-svn: 125014
These operations are expanded to pairs of loads or stores, and the first one
uses the address register update to produce the address for the second one.
So far, the second load/store has also updated the address register, just
for convenience, since that output has never been used. In anticipation of
actually supporting post-increment updates for these operations, this changes
the non-updating operations to use a non-updating load/store for the second
instruction.
llvm-svn: 125013
This allows us to easily support 256-bit operations that don't have
native 256-bit support. This applies to integer operations, certain
types of shuffles and various othher things.
llvm-svn: 124910
(yes, this is different from R_ARM_CALL)
- Adds a new method getARMBranchTargetOpValue() which handles the
necessary distinction between the conditional and unconditional br/bl
needed for ARM/ELF
At least for ARM mode, the needed fixup for conditional versus unconditional
br/bl is identical, but the ARM docs and existing ARM tools expect this
reloc type...
Added a few FIXME's for future naming fixups in ARMInstrInfo.td
llvm-svn: 124895
matching EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR to VEXTRACTF128 along with support routines
to examine and translate index values. VINSERTF128 comes next. With
these two in place we can begin supporting more AVX operations as
INSERT/EXTRACT can be used as a fallback when 256-bit support is not
available.
llvm-svn: 124797
Reversing the operands allows us to fold, but doesn't force us to. Also, at
this point the DAG is still being optimized, so the check for hasOneUse is not
very precise.
llvm-svn: 124773
This makes the job of the later optzn passes easier, allowing the vast amount of
icmp transforms to chew on it.
We transform 840 switches in gcc.c, leading to a 16k byte shrink of the resulting
binary on i386-linux.
The testcase from README.txt now compiles into
decl %edi
cmpl $3, %edi
sbbl %eax, %eax
andl $1, %eax
ret
llvm-svn: 124724
the load, then it may be legal to transform the load and store to integer
load and store of the same width.
This is done if the target specified the transformation as profitable. e.g.
On arm, this can transform:
vldr.32 s0, []
vstr.32 s0, []
to
ldr r12, []
str r12, []
rdar://8944252
llvm-svn: 124708
This happens all the time when a smul is promoted to a larger type.
On x86-64 we now compile "int test(int x) { return x/10; }" into
movslq %edi, %rax
imulq $1717986919, %rax, %rax
movq %rax, %rcx
shrq $63, %rcx
sarq $34, %rax <- used to be "shrq $32, %rax; sarl $2, %eax"
addl %ecx, %eax
This fires 96 times in gcc.c on x86-64.
llvm-svn: 124559
