LLVM ToT produces poor MMX code compared to 3.5. However, part of the previous
functionality can be achieved by using -x86-experimental-vector-widening-legalization.
Add tests to be sure we don't regress again.
llvm-svn: 227869
ObjectLinkingLayer.
There are a two of overloads for addObject, one of which transfers ownership of
the underlying buffer to OrcMCJITReplacement. This commit makes the ownership
transfering version pass ownership down to the ObjectLinkingLayer in order to
prevent the issue described in r227778.
I think this commit will fix the sanitizer bot failures that necessitated the
removal of the load-object-a.ll regression test in r227785, so I'm reinstating
that test.
llvm-svn: 227845
described by integer constants. This is a bit ugly, but if the source
language allows arbitrary type casting, the debug info must follow suit.
For example:
void foo() {
float a;
*(int *)&a = 0;
}
For the curious: SROA replaces the float alloca with an i32 alloca, which
is then optimized away and described via dbg.value(i32 0, ...).
llvm-svn: 227827
This is true for SI only. CI+ supports unaligned memory accesses,
but this requires driver support, so for now we disallow unaligned
accesses for all GCN targets.
llvm-svn: 227822
This avoids a partial false dependency on the previous content of
the upper lanes of the destination vector register.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7307
llvm-svn: 227820
Summary:
Previously it only avoided optimizing signed comparisons to 0.
Sometimes the DAGCombiner will optimize the unsigned comparisons
to 0 before it gets to the peephole pass, but sometimes it doesn't.
Fix for PR22373.
Test Plan: test/CodeGen/ARM/sub-cmp-peephole.ll
Reviewers: jfb, manmanren
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7274
llvm-svn: 227809
The commit r225977 uncovered this bug. The problem was that the vectorizer tried to
read the second operand of an already deleted instruction.
The bug didn't show up before r225977 because the freed memory still contained a non-null pointer.
With r225977 deletion of instructions is delayed and the read operand pointer is always null.
llvm-svn: 227800
The VSX store instructions were also picking up an implicit "may read" from the
default pattern, which was an intrinsic (and we don't currently have a way of
specifying write-only intrinsics).
This was causing MI verification to fail for VSX spill restores.
llvm-svn: 227759
isel is actually a cracked instruction on the P7/P8, and must start a dispatch
group. The scheduling model should reflect this so that we don't bunch too many
of them together when possible.
Thanks to Bill Schmidt and Pat Haugen for helping to sort this out.
llvm-svn: 227758
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
(Re-commit of r227728)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
llvm-svn: 227752
The TOC base pointer is passed in r2, and we normally reserve this register so
that we can depend on it being there. However, for leaf functions, and
specifically those leaf functions that don't do any TOC access of their own
(which is generally due to accessing the constant pool, using TLS, etc.),
we can treat r2 as an ordinary callee-saved register (it must be callee-saved
because, for local direct calls, the linker will not insert any save/restore
code).
The allocation order has been changed slightly for PPC64/ELF systems to put r2
at the end of the list (while leaving it near the beginning for Darwin systems
to prevent unnecessary output changes). While r2 is allocatable, using it still
requires spill/restore traffic, and thus comes at the end of the list.
llvm-svn: 227745
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
llvm-svn: 227728
This should be sufficient to replace the initial (minor) function pass
pipeline in Clang with the new pass manager. I'll probably add an (off
by default) flag to do that just to ensure we can get extra testing.
llvm-svn: 227726
I've added RUN lines both to the basic test for EarlyCSE and the
target-specific test, as this serves as a nice test that the TTI layer
in the new pass manager is in fact working well.
llvm-svn: 227725
over declarations.
This is both quite unproductive and causes things to crash, for example
domtree would just assert.
I've added a declaration and a domtree run to the basic high-level tests
for the new pass manager.
llvm-svn: 227724
produce it.
This adds a function to the TargetMachine that produces this analysis
via a callback for each function. This in turn faves the way to produce
a *different* TTI per-function with the correct subtarget cached.
I've also done the necessary wiring in the opt tool to thread the target
machine down and make it available to the pass registry so that we can
construct this analysis from a target machine when available.
llvm-svn: 227721
Summary:
CUDA driver can unroll loops when jit-compiling PTX. To prevent CUDA
driver from unrolling a loop marked with llvm.loop.unroll.disable is not
unrolled by CUDA driver, we need to emit .pragma "nounroll" at the
header of that loop.
This patch also extracts getting unroll metadata from loop ID metadata
into a shared helper function.
Test Plan: test/CodeGen/NVPTX/nounroll.ll
Reviewers: eliben, meheff, jholewinski
Reviewed By: jholewinski
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7041
llvm-svn: 227703
aggregate or scalar, the debug info needs to refer to the absolute offset
(relative to the entire variable) instead of storing the offset inside
the smaller aggregate.
llvm-svn: 227702
This patch adds shuffle mask decodes for integer zero extends (pmovzx** and movq xmm,xmm) and scalar float/double loads/moves (movss/movsd).
Also adds shuffle mask decodes for integer loads (movd/movq).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7228
llvm-svn: 227688
Add a trivial binary (int main() { return 0; }) built for Windows on ARM to
ensure that we can correctly identify ARM_MOV32(T) base relocations. Addresses
post-commit review comments.
llvm-svn: 227673
type erased interface and a single analysis pass rather than an
extremely complex analysis group.
The end result is that the TTI analysis can contain a type erased
implementation that supports the polymorphic TTI interface. We can build
one from a target-specific implementation or from a dummy one in the IR.
I've also factored all of the code into "mix-in"-able base classes,
including CRTP base classes to facilitate calling back up to the most
specialized form when delegating horizontally across the surface. These
aren't as clean as I would like and I'm planning to work on cleaning
some of this up, but I wanted to start by putting into the right form.
There are a number of reasons for this change, and this particular
design. The first and foremost reason is that an analysis group is
complete overkill, and the chaining delegation strategy was so opaque,
confusing, and high overhead that TTI was suffering greatly for it.
Several of the TTI functions had failed to be implemented in all places
because of the chaining-based delegation making there be no checking of
this. A few other functions were implemented with incorrect delegation.
The message to me was very clear working on this -- the delegation and
analysis group structure was too confusing to be useful here.
The other reason of course is that this is *much* more natural fit for
the new pass manager. This will lay the ground work for a type-erased
per-function info object that can look up the correct subtarget and even
cache it.
Yet another benefit is that this will significantly simplify the
interaction of the pass managers and the TargetMachine. See the future
work below.
The downside of this change is that it is very, very verbose. I'm going
to work to improve that, but it is somewhat an implementation necessity
in C++ to do type erasure. =/ I discussed this design really extensively
with Eric and Hal prior to going down this path, and afterward showed
them the result. No one was really thrilled with it, but there doesn't
seem to be a substantially better alternative. Using a base class and
virtual method dispatch would make the code much shorter, but as
discussed in the update to the programmer's manual and elsewhere,
a polymorphic interface feels like the more principled approach even if
this is perhaps the least compelling example of it. ;]
Ultimately, there is still a lot more to be done here, but this was the
huge chunk that I couldn't really split things out of because this was
the interface change to TTI. I've tried to minimize all the other parts
of this. The follow up work should include at least:
1) Improving the TargetMachine interface by having it directly return
a TTI object. Because we have a non-pass object with value semantics
and an internal type erasure mechanism, we can narrow the interface
of the TargetMachine to *just* do what we need: build and return
a TTI object that we can then insert into the pass pipeline.
2) Make the TTI object be fully specialized for a particular function.
This will include splitting off a minimal form of it which is
sufficient for the inliner and the old pass manager.
3) Add a new pass manager analysis which produces TTI objects from the
target machine for each function. This may actually be done as part
of #2 in order to use the new analysis to implement #2.
4) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and the targets so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to type erase.
5) Work on narrowing the API between TTI and its clients so that it is
easier to understand and less verbose to forward.
6) Try to improve the CRTP-based delegation. I feel like this code is
just a bit messy and exacerbating the complexity of implementing
the TTI in each target.
Many thanks to Eric and Hal for their help here. I ended up blocked on
this somewhat more abruptly than I expected, and so I appreciate getting
it sorted out very quickly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7293
llvm-svn: 227669
Now that -mstack-probe-size is piped through to the backend via the function
attribute as on Windows x86, honour the value to permit handling of non-default
values for stack probes. This is needed /Gs with the clang-cl driver or
-mstack-probe-size with the clang driver when targeting Windows on ARM.
llvm-svn: 227667
segname,sectname to specify a Mach-O section to print. The printing is based on
the section type or section attributes.
The printing of the module initialization and termination section types is printed
with this change. Printing of other section types will be added next.
llvm-svn: 227649
Same sort of bug as on ARM where the cmp+branch are lowered to br_cc
(choosing the branch's debugloc for the br_cc's debugloc) then expanded
out to a cmp and a br, but both using the debug loc of the br_cc, thus
losing fidelity.
llvm-svn: 227645
Patch by: Igor Laevsky
"Statepoint verifier tests were using wrong names for the statepoint and gc.relocate intrinsics. This change renames them to use correct names and fixes all uncovered issues."
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7266
llvm-svn: 227636
Some of those didn't even have run lines: they were removed
inadvertently during the Great Merge of 2014.
They used to check for DUPs, but now we go through W-regs?
Filed PR22418 for that potential regression.
For now, just make the tests explicit, so we now where we stand.
llvm-svn: 227635
Also revert r227489 since it didn't actually fix the thing I thought I
was fixing (since the test case was targeting the wrong architecture
initially). The change might be correct & demonstrated by other test
cases, but it's not a priority for me to find those test cases right
now.
Filed PR22417 for the failure.
llvm-svn: 227632
MSDN's x64 software conventions page says that this is one of the fixed
list of legal epilogues:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tawsa7cb.aspx
Presumably this is how the unwinder distinguishes epilogue jumps from
in-function control flow.
Also normalize the way we place "## TAILCALL" comments on such jumps.
llvm-svn: 227611
If the original FPU specification involved a restricted VFP unit (d16), ensure
that we reset the functionality when we encounter a new FPU type. In
particular, if the user specified vfpv3-d16, but switched to a VFPv3 (which has
32 double precision registers), we would fail to reset the D16 feature, and
treat it as being equivalent to vfpv3-d16.
llvm-svn: 227603
