Summary:
LDWRdPtr would be expanded to ld+ldd. ldd only accepts the pointer register is Y or Z.
So the register class of pointer of LDWRdPtr should be PTRDISPREGS instead of PTRREGS.
Reviewers: dylanmckay
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Subscribers: dylanmckay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62300
llvm-svn: 362351
Prior to this patch, the AVR::LDWRdPtr instruction was always lowered to
instructions of this pattern:
ld $GPR8, [PTR:XYZ]+
ld $GPR8, [PTR]+1
This has a problem; the [PTR] is incremented in-place once, but never
decremented.
Future uses of the same pointer will use the now clobbered value,
leading to the pointer being incorrect by an offset of one.
This patch modifies the expansion code of the LDWRdPtr pseudo
instruction so that the pointer variable is not silently clobbered in
future uses in the same live range.
Bug first reported by Keshav Kini.
Patch by Kaushik Phatak.
llvm-svn: 351673
This reverts commit r351544.
In that commit, I had mistakenly misattributed the issue submitter as
the patch author, Kaushik Phatak.
The patch will be recommitted immediately with the correct attribution.
llvm-svn: 351672
Prior to this patch, the AVR::LDWRdPtr instruction was always lowered to
instructions of this pattern:
ld $GPR8, [PTR:XYZ]+
ld $GPR8, [PTR]+1
This has a problem; the [PTR] is incremented in-place once, but never
decremented.
Future uses of the same pointer will use the now clobbered value,
leading to the pointer being incorrect by an offset of one.
This patch modifies the expansion code of the LDWRdPtr pseudo
instruction so that the pointer variable is not silently clobbered in
future uses in the same live range.
Patch by Keshav Kini.
llvm-svn: 351544
Summary:
A lot of the pseudo instructions are required because LLVM assumes that
all integers of the same size as the pointer size are legal. This means
that it will not currently expand 16-bit instructions to their 8-bit
variants because it thinks 16-bit types are legal for the operations.
This also adds all of the CodeGen tests that required the pass to run.
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: wdng, mgorny, modocache, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26577
llvm-svn: 287162
