As an example, the change to InstCombineCalls catches a common case where a call to a bitcast of a function is rewritten.
Chris, does this approach look reasonable?
llvm-svn: 131516
This obviously helps a lot if the division would be turned into a libcall
(think i64 udiv on i386), but div is also one of the few remaining instructions
on modern CPUs that become more expensive when the bitwidth gets bigger.
This also helps register pressure on i386 when dividing chars, divb needs
two 8-bit parts of a 16 bit register as input where divl uses two registers.
int foo(unsigned char a) { return a/10; }
int bar(unsigned char a, unsigned char b) { return a/b; }
compiles into (x86_64)
_foo:
imull $205, %edi, %eax
shrl $11, %eax
ret
_bar:
movzbl %dil, %eax
divb %sil, %al
movzbl %al, %eax
ret
llvm-svn: 130615
This shouldn't happen in practice because the icmp would be a constant.
Add a check so we don't miscompile code if something goes wrong.
llvm-svn: 130446
effective in avoiding recomputation of LCSSA form; the widespread
use of instsimplify (which looks through phi nodes) means it was
not preserving LCSSA form anyway; and instcombine is no longer
scheduled in the middle of the loop passes so this doesn't matter
anymore.
llvm-svn: 130301
when X has multiple uses. This is useful for exposing secondary optimizations,
but the X86 backend isn't ready for this when X has a single use. For example,
this can disable load folding.
This is inching towards resolving PR6627.
llvm-svn: 130238
Now that we have a first-class way to represent unaligned loads, the unaligned
load intrinsics are superfluous.
First part of <rdar://problem/8460511>.
llvm-svn: 129401
space info. We crash with an assert in this case. This change checks that the
address space of the bitcasted pointer is the same as the gep ptr.
llvm-svn: 128884
It's possible to craft an input that hits the recursion limits in a way
that SimplifyDemandedBits doesn't simplify the icmp but ComputeMaskedBits
can infer which bits are zero.
No test case as it depends on too many other things. Fixes PR9609.
llvm-svn: 128777
- Localize the check if an icmp has one use to a place where we know we're
introducing something that's likely more expensive than a sext from i1.
- Add an assert to make sure a case that would lead to a miscompilation is
folded away earlier.
- Fix a typo.
llvm-svn: 128744
removes one use of X which helps it pass the many hasOneUse() checks.
In my analysis, this turns up very often where X = A >>exact B and that can't be
simplified unless X has one use (except by increasing the lifetime of A which is
generally a performance loss).
llvm-svn: 128373
load and store reference same memory location, the memory location
is represented by getelementptr with two uses (load and store) and
the getelementptr's base is alloca with single use. At this point,
instructions from alloca to store can be removed.
(this pattern is generated when bitfield is accessed.)
For example,
%u = alloca %struct.test, align 4 ; [#uses=1]
%0 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.test* %u, i32 0, i32 0;[#uses=2]
%1 = load i8* %0, align 4 ; [#uses=1]
%2 = and i8 %1, -16 ; [#uses=1]
%3 = or i8 %2, 5 ; [#uses=1]
store i8 %3, i8* %0, align 4
llvm-svn: 127565
This happens a lot in clang-compiled C++ code because it adds overflow checks to operator new[]:
unsigned *foo(unsigned n) { return new unsigned[n]; }
We can optimize away the overflow check on 64 bit targets because (uint64_t)n*4 cannot overflow.
llvm-svn: 127418
the value splatted into every element. Extend this to getTrue and getFalse which
by providing new overloads that take Types that are either i1 or <N x i1>. Use
it in InstCombine to add vector support to some code, fixing PR8469!
llvm-svn: 127116
possible. This goes into instcombine and instsimplify because instsimplify
doesn't need to check hasOneUse since it returns (almost exclusively) constants.
This fixes PR9343 #4#5 and #8!
llvm-svn: 127064
intersection of the LHS and RHS ConstantRanges and return "false" when
the range is empty.
This simplifies some code and catches some extra cases.
llvm-svn: 126744
function prototype into a call to a varargs prototype. We do
allow the xform if we have a definition, but otherwise we don't
want to risk that we're changing the abi in a subtle way. On
X86-64, for example, varargs require passing stuff in %al.
llvm-svn: 126363
We usually catch this kind of optimization through InstSimplify's distributive
magic, but or doesn't distribute over xor in general.
"A | ~(A | B) -> A | ~B" hits 24 times on gcc.c.
llvm-svn: 126081
gep to explicit addressing, we know that none of the intermediate
computation overflows.
This could use review: it seems that the shifts certainly wouldn't
overflow, but could the intermediate adds overflow if there is a
negative index?
Previously the testcase would instcombine to:
define i1 @test(i64 %i) {
%p1.idx.mask = and i64 %i, 4611686018427387903
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %p1.idx.mask, 1000
ret i1 %cmp
}
now we get:
define i1 @test(i64 %i) {
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %i, 1000
ret i1 %cmp
}
llvm-svn: 125271
exact/nsw/nuw shifts and have instcombine infer them when it can prove
that the relevant properties are true for a given shift without them.
Also, a variety of refactoring to use the new patternmatch logic thrown
in for good luck. I believe that this takes care of a bunch of related
code quality issues attached to PR8862.
llvm-svn: 125267
optimizations to be much more aggressive in the face of
exact/nsw/nuw div and shifts. For example, these (which
are the same except the first is 'exact' sdiv:
define i1 @sdiv_icmp4_exact(i64 %X) nounwind {
%A = sdiv exact i64 %X, -5 ; X/-5 == 0 --> x == 0
%B = icmp eq i64 %A, 0
ret i1 %B
}
define i1 @sdiv_icmp4(i64 %X) nounwind {
%A = sdiv i64 %X, -5 ; X/-5 == 0 --> x == 0
%B = icmp eq i64 %A, 0
ret i1 %B
}
compile down to:
define i1 @sdiv_icmp4_exact(i64 %X) nounwind {
%1 = icmp eq i64 %X, 0
ret i1 %1
}
define i1 @sdiv_icmp4(i64 %X) nounwind {
%X.off = add i64 %X, 4
%1 = icmp ult i64 %X.off, 9
ret i1 %1
}
This happens when you do something like:
(ptr1-ptr2) == 42
where the pointers are pointers to non-unit types.
llvm-svn: 125266
and generally tidying things up. Only very trivial functionality changes
like now doing (-1 - A) -> (~A) for vectors too.
InstCombineAddSub.cpp | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
llvm-svn: 125264
versions of creation functions. Eventually, the "insertion point" versions
of these should just be removed, we do have IRBuilder afterall.
Do a massive rewrite of much of pattern match. It is now shorter and less
redundant and has several other widgets I will be using in other patches.
Among other changes, m_Div is renamed to m_IDiv (since it only matches
integer divides) and m_Shift is gone (it used to match all binops!!) and
we now have m_LogicalShift for the one client to use.
Enhance IRBuilder to have "isExact" arguments to things like CreateUDiv
and reduce redundancy within IRbuilder by having these methods chain to
each other more instead of duplicating code.
llvm-svn: 125194
benchmarks, and that it can be simplified to X/Y. (In general you can only
simplify (Z*Y)/Y to Z if the multiplication did not overflow; if Z has the
form "X/Y" then this is the case). This patch implements that transform and
moves some Div logic out of instcombine and into InstructionSimplify.
Unfortunately instcombine gets in the way somewhat, since it likes to change
(X/Y)*Y into X-(X rem Y), so I had to teach instcombine about this too.
Finally, thanks to the NSW/NUW flags, sometimes we know directly that "Z*Y"
does not overflow, because the flag says so, so I added that logic too. This
eliminates a bunch of divisions and subtractions in 447.dealII, and has good
effects on some other benchmarks too. It seems to have quite an effect on
tramp3d-v4 but it's hard to say if it's good or bad because inlining decisions
changed, resulting in massive changes all over.
llvm-svn: 124487
clang's -Wuninitialized-experimental warning.
While these don't look like real bugs, clang's
-Wuninitialized-experimental analysis is stricter
than GCC's, and these fixes have the benefit
of being general nice cleanups.
llvm-svn: 124073
a select. A vector select is pairwise on each element so we'd need a new
condition with the right number of elements to select on. Fixes PR8994.
llvm-svn: 123963
auto-simplier the transform most missed by early-cse is (zext X) != 0 -> X != 0.
This patch adds this transform and some related logic to InstructionSimplify
and removes some of the logic from instcombine (unfortunately not all because
there are several situations in which instcombine can improve things by making
new instructions, whereas instsimplify is not allowed to do this). At -O2 this
often results in more than 15% more simplifications by early-cse, and results in
hundreds of lines of bitcode being eliminated from the testsuite. I did see some
small negative effects in the testsuite, for example a few additional instructions
in three programs. One program, 483.xalancbmk, got an additional 35 instructions,
which seems to be due to a function getting an additional instruction and then
being inlined all over the place.
llvm-svn: 123911
multiple uses. In some cases, all the uses are the same operation,
so instcombine can go ahead and promote the phi. In the testcase
this pushes an add out of the loop.
llvm-svn: 123568
While there, I noticed that the transform "undef >>a X -> undef" was wrong.
For example if X is 2 then the top two bits must be equal, so the result can
not be anything. I fixed this in the constant folder as well. Also, I made
the transform for "X << undef" stronger: it now folds to undef always, even
though X might be zero. This is in accordance with the LangRef, but I must
admit that it is fairly aggressive. Also, I added "i32 X << 32 -> undef"
following the LangRef and the constant folder, likewise fairly aggressive.
llvm-svn: 123417
X = sext x; x >s c ? X : C+1 --> X = sext x; X <s C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = sext x; x <s c ? X : C-1 --> X = sext x; X >s C-1 ? C-1 : X
X = zext x; x >u c ? X : C+1 --> X = zext x; X <u C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = zext x; x <u c ? X : C-1 --> X = zext x; X >u C-1 ? C-1 : X
X = sext x; x >u c ? X : C+1 --> X = sext x; X <u C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = sext x; x <u c ? X : C-1 --> X = sext x; X >u C-1 ? C-1 : X
Instead of calculating this with mixed types promote all to the
larger type. This enables scalar evolution to analyze this
expression. PR8866
llvm-svn: 123034
if both A op B and A op C simplify. This fires fairly often but doesn't
make that much difference. On gcc-as-one-file it removes two "and"s and
turns one branch into a select.
llvm-svn: 122399
