("T is 1 if the target symbol S has type STT_FUNC and the
symbol addresses a Thumb instruction ;it is 0 otherwise."
from "ELF for the ARM Architecture" 4.7.1.2)
Patch by Koan-Sin Tan!
llvm-svn: 131406
In particular, into EngineBuilder. This should only impact
the private API between the EE and EB classes, not external
clients, since JITCtor and MCJITCtor are both protected members.
llvm-svn: 131317
actually takes rather than how much memory was allocated for it. This
is more accurate and should help the manager pack things more effectively.
llvm-svn: 131305
by non-CMP expressions. The executable test case (129821) would test
this as well, if we had an "-O0 -disable-arm-fast-isel" LLVM-GCC
tester. Alas, the ARM assembly would be very difficult to check with
FileCheck.
The thumb2-cbnz.ll test is affected; it generates larger code (tst.w
vs. cmp #0), but I believe the new version is correct.
rdar://problem/9298790
llvm-svn: 131261
erroring out completely. Some modules produce sections that aren't referenced,
so it's friendlier to clients like LLDB to just skip them, at least for now.
llvm-svn: 131243
LLVM and binutils.
With this patch, there are no functional differences between the .o
produced directly from LLVM versus the .s to .o via GNU as, for relocation tags
at least, for both PIC and non-PIC modes.
Because some non-PIC reloc tags are used (legally) on PIC, so IsPCRel flag is
necessary but not sufficient to determine whether the overall codegen mode is
PIC or not. Why is this necessary? There is an incompatibility of how relocs
are emitted in the .rodata section. Binutils PIC likes to emit certain relocs
as section relative offsets. Non-PIC does not do this.
So I added a hidden switch on the ELFObjectwriter "-arm-elf-force-pic" which
forces the objectwriter to pretend that all relocs are for PIC mode.
Todo: Activate ForceARMElfPIC to true if -relocation-model=pic is selected
on llc.
Todo: There are probably more issues for PIC mode on ARM/MC/ELF...
Todo: Existing tests in MC/ARM/elf-reloc*.ll need to be converted over to .s
tests as well as expanded to cover the gamut.
llvm-svn: 131205
about to be spilled.
This can only happen when two extra snippet registers are included in the spill,
and there is a copy between them. Hoisting the spill creates problems because
the hoist will mark the copy for later dead code elimination, and spilling the
second register will turn the copy into a spill.
<rdar://problem/9420853>
llvm-svn: 131192
This change allows bugpoint to pinpoint the "opt" pass and bitcode
segment responsible for a crash caused by miscompilation. At least it
works well for me now, without having to create any custom execution
wrappers.
llvm-svn: 131186
If there is a store after the load node, then there is a chain, which means
that there is another user. Thus, asking hasOneUser would fail. Instead we
ask hasNUsesOfValue on the 'data' value.
llvm-svn: 131183
intrinsic call. This prevents it from being reordered so that it appears
*before* the setjmp intrinsic (thus making it completely useless).
<rdar://problem/9409683>
llvm-svn: 131174
at the start of basic blocks to their common predecessor. It's actually quite
common (e.g. about 50 times in JM/lencod) and has shown to be a nice code size
benefit. e.g.
pushq %rax
testl %edi, %edi
jne LBB0_2
## BB#1:
xorb %al, %al
popq %rdx
ret
LBB0_2:
xorb %al, %al
callq _foo
popq %rdx
ret
=>
pushq %rax
xorb %al, %al
testl %edi, %edi
je LBB0_2
## BB#1:
callq _foo
LBB0_2:
popq %rdx
ret
rdar://9145558
llvm-svn: 131172
