The CL was originally failing due to the use of some C++14
specific features, so I've removed those. Hopefully this will
satisfy the bots.
llvm-svn: 282867
enumerate allows you to iterate over a range by pairing the
iterator's value with its index in the enumeration. This gives
you most of the benefits of using a for loop while still allowing
the range syntax.
llvm-svn: 282804
llvm::join_items is similar to llvm::join, which produces a string
by concatenating a sequence of values together separated by a
given separator. But it differs in that the arguments to
llvm::join() are same-type members of a container, whereas the
arguments to llvm::join_items are arbitrary types passed into
a variadic template. The only requirement on parameters to
llvm::join_items (including for the separator themselves) is
that they be implicitly convertible to std::string or have
an overload of std::string::operator+
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24880
llvm-svn: 282502
a function pass nested inside of a CGSCC pass manager.
This is very similar to the previous unittest but makes sure the
invalidation logic works across all the layers here.
llvm-svn: 282378
This reinstates r280447. Original commit log:
This wasn't really well explicitly tested with a nice unittest before.
It seems good to have reasonably broken out unittests for this kind of
functionality as I'm workin go other invalidation features to make sure
none of the existing ones regress.
This still has too much duplicated code, I plan to factor that out in
a subsequent commit to use common helpers for repeated parts of this.
llvm-svn: 282377
This adds 4 new functions to StringRef, which can be used to
take or drop characters while a certain condition is met, or
until a certain condition is met. They are:
take_while - Return characters until a condition is not met.
take_until - Return characters until a condition is met.
drop_while - Remove characters until a condition is not met.
drop_until - Remove characters until a condition is met.
Internally, all of these functions delegate to two additional
helper functions which can be used to search for the position
of a character meeting or not meeting a condition, which are:
find_if - Find the first character matching a predicate.
find_if_not - Find the first character not matching a predicate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24842
llvm-svn: 282346
Summary:
For AMDGPU, we have been using the operating system component of the triple
for specifying the low-level runtime that is being used. The rationale for
this is that the host operating system (e.g. Linux) is irrelevant for GPU code,
since its execution enviroment will be mostly controled by the low-level runtime
being used to execute the code.
In most cases, higher level languages have their own runtime which is
implemented on top of the low-level runtime. The kernel ABIs of each
language mostly depend on the low-level runtime, but there may be some
slight differences between languages. OpenCL for example, may append
additional arguments to the kernel in order to pass values like global
offsets or buffers for printf. OpenMP, HCC, or other languages may want
to add their own values which differ from OpenCL.
The reason for adding a new opencl environment type is to make it possible for the backend
to distinguish between the ABIs of the higher-level languages and handle them correctly.
It seems cleaner to use the enviroment component for this rather than creating a new
OS type for every combination of low-level runtime / high-level language.
Reviewers: Anastasia, chandlerc
Subscribers: whchung, pekka.jaaskelainen, wdng, yaxunl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24735
llvm-svn: 282218
A recent patch added support for consumeInteger() and made
getAsInteger delegate to this function. A few buildbots are
failing as a result with an assertion failure. On a hunch,
I tested what happens if I call getAsInteger() on an empty
string, and sure enough it crashes the same way that the
buildbots are crashing.
I confirmed that getAsInteger() on an empty string did not
crash before my patch, so I suspect this to be the cause.
I also added a unit test for the empty string.
llvm-svn: 282170
StringRef::getInteger() exists and treats the entire string as
an integer of the specified radix, failing if any invalid characters
are encountered or the number overflows.
Sometimes you might have something like "123456foo" and you want
to get the number 123456 and leave the string "foo" remaining.
This is similar to what would be possible by using the standard
runtime library functions strtoul et al and specifying an end
pointer.
This patch adds consumeInteger(), which does exactly that. It
consumes as much as possible until an invalid character is found,
and modifies the StringRef in place so that upon return only
the portion of the StringRef after the number remains.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24778
llvm-svn: 282164
LazyCallGraph to support repeated, stable iterations, even in the face
of graph updates.
This is particularly important to allow the CGSCC pass manager to walk
the RefSCCs (and thus everything else) in a module more than once. Lots
of unittests and other tests were hard or impossible to write because
repeated CGSCC pass managers which didn't invalidate the LazyCallGraph
would conclude the module was empty after the first one. =[ Really,
really bad.
The interesting thing is that in many ways this simplifies the code. We
can now re-use the same code for handling reference edge insertion
updates of the RefSCC graph as we use for handling call edge insertion
updates of the SCC graph. Outside of adapting to the shared logic for
this (which isn't trivial, but is *much* simpler than the DFS it
replaces!), the new code involves putting newly created RefSCCs when
deleting a reference edge into the cached list in the correct way, and
to re-formulate the iterator to be stable and effective even in the face
of these kinds of updates.
I've updated the unittests for the LazyCallGraph to re-iterate the
postorder sequence and verify that this all works. We even check for
using alternating iterators to trigger the lazy formation of RefSCCs
after mutation has occured.
It's worth noting that there are a reasonable number of likely
simplifications we can make past this. It isn't clear that we need to
keep the "LeafRefSCCs" around any more. But I've not removed that mostly
because I want this to be a more isolated change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24219
llvm-svn: 281716
It was only really there as a sentinel when instructions had to have precisely
one type. Now that registers are typed, each register really has to have a type
that is sized.
llvm-svn: 281599
Otherwise everything that needs to work out what size they are has to keep a
DataLayout handy, which is a bit silly and very annoying.
llvm-svn: 281597
The test exercises the branch in scev expansion when the value in ValueOffsetPair
is a ptr and the offset is not divisible by the elem type size of value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24088
llvm-svn: 281575
This should allow users of the library to get a range to iterate through
all the subcommands that are registered to the global parser. This
allows users to define subcommands in libraries that self-register to
have dispatch done at a different stage (like main). It allows for
writing code like the following:
for (auto *S : cl::getRegisteredSubcommands()) {
if (*S) {
// Dispatch on S->getName().
}
}
This change also contains tests that show this usage pattern.
Reviewers: zturner, dblaikie, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24489
llvm-svn: 281290
This patch reverses the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable.
This will allow us to more easily preserve debug info metadata when
manipulating global variables.
Fixes PR30362. A program for upgrading test cases is attached to that
bug.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20147
llvm-svn: 281284
Remove createNode() and any API that depending on it, and add
HasCreateNode to the list of checks for HasObsoleteCustomizations. Now
an ilist *never* allocates (this was already true for iplist).
This factors out all the differences between iplist and ilist. I'll aim
to rename both to "owning_ilist" eventually, to call out the interesting
(not exactly intrusive) ownership semantics. In the meantime, I've left
both names around to reduce code churn.
One of the deleted APIs is the ilist copy constructor. I've lifted up
and tested iplist::cloneFrom (ala simple_ilist::cloneFrom) as a
replacement.
Users of ilist<> and iplist<> that want the list to allocate nodes have
a few options:
- use std::list;
- use AllocatorList or BumpPtrList (or build a similarly trivial list);
- use cloneFrom (which is explicit at the call site); or
- allocate at the call site.
See r280573, r281177, r281181, and r281182 for examples of what to do if
you're updating out-of-tree code.
llvm-svn: 281184
- Add AllocatorList, a non-intrusive list that owns an LLVM-style
allocator and provides a std::list-like interface (trivially built on
top of simple_ilist),
- add a typedef (and unit tests) for BumpPtrList, and
- use BumpPtrList for the list of llvm::yaml::Token (i.e., TokenQueueT).
TokenQueueT has no need for the complexity of an intrusive list. The
only reason to inherit from ilist was to customize the allocator.
TokenQueueT was the only example in-tree of using ilist<> in a truly
non-intrusive way.
Moreover, this removes the final use of the non-intrusive
ilist_traits<>::createNode (after r280573, r281177, and r281181). I
have a WIP patch that removes this customization point (and the API that
relies on it) that I plan to commit soon.
Note: AllocatorList owns the allocator, which limits the viable API
(e.g., splicing must be on the same list). For now I've left out
any problematic API. It wouldn't be hard to split AllocatorList into
two layers: an Impl class that calls DerivedT::getAlloc (via CRTP), and
derived classes that handle Allocator ownership/reference/etc semantics;
and then implement splice with appropriate assertions; but TBH we should
probably just customize the std::list allocators at that point.
llvm-svn: 281182
Now that MachineBasicBlock::reverse_instr_iterator knows when it's at
the end (since r281168 and r281170), implement
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator directly on top of an
ilist::reverse_iterator by adding an IsReverse template parameter to
MachineInstrBundleIterator. This replaces another hard-to-reason-about
use of std::reverse_iterator on list iterators, matching the changes for
ilist::reverse_iterator from r280032 (see the "out of scope" section at
the end of that commit message). MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator
now has a handle to the current node and has obvious invalidation
semantics.
r280032 has a more detailed explanation of how list-style reverse
iterators (invalidated when the pointed-at node is deleted) are
different from vector-style reverse iterators like std::reverse_iterator
(invalidated on every operation). A great motivating example is this
commit's changes to lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp.
Note: If your out-of-tree backend deletes instructions while iterating
on a MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator or converts between
MachineBasicBlock::iterator and MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator,
you'll need to update your code in similar ways to r280032. The
following table might help:
[Old] ==> [New]
delete &*RI, RE = end() delete &*RI++
RI->erase(), RE = end() RI++->erase()
reverse_iterator(I) std::prev(I).getReverse()
reverse_iterator(I) ++I.getReverse()
--reverse_iterator(I) I.getReverse()
reverse_iterator(std::next(I)) I.getReverse()
RI.base() std::prev(RI).getReverse()
RI.base() ++RI.getReverse()
--RI.base() RI.getReverse()
std::next(RI).base() RI.getReverse()
(For more details, have a look at r280032.)
llvm-svn: 281172
Add an assertion to the MachineInstrBundleIterator from instr_iterator
that the underlying iterator is valid. This is possible know that we
can check ilist_node::isSentinel (since r281168), and is consistent with
the constructors from MachineInstr* and MachineInstr&.
Avoiding the new assertion in operator== and operator!= requires four
(!!!!) new overloads each.
(As an aside, I'm strongly in favour of:
- making the conversion from instr_iterator explicit;
- making the conversion from pointer explicit;
- making the conversion from reference explicit; and
- removing all the extra overloads of operator== and operator!= except
const_instr_iterator.
I'm not signing up for that at this point, but being clear about when
something is an MachineInstr-iterator (possibly instr_end()) vs
MachineInstr-bundle-iterator (possibly end()) vs MachineInstr* (possibly
nullptr) vs MachineInstr& (known valid) would surely make code
cleaner... and it would remove a ton of boilerplate from
MachineInstrBundleIterator operators.)
llvm-svn: 281170
This is a prep commit before fixing MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator
invalidation semantics, ala r281167 for ilist::reverse_iterator. This
changes MachineBasicBlock::Instructions to track which node is the
sentinel regardless of LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS.
There's almost no functionality change (aside from ABI). However, in
the rare configuration:
#if !defined(NDEBUG) && !defined(LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS)
the isKnownSentinel() assertions in ilist_iterator<>::operator* suddenly
have teeth for MachineInstr. If these assertions start firing for your
out-of-tree backend, have a look at the suggestions in the commit
message for r279314, and at some of the commits leading up to it that
avoid dereferencing the end() iterator.
llvm-svn: 281168
This adds two declarative configuration options for intrusive lists
(available for simple_ilist, iplist, and ilist). Both of these options
affect ilist_node interoperability and need to be passed both to the
node and the list. Instead of adding a new traits class, they're
specified as optional template parameters (in any order).
The two options:
1. Pass ilist_sentinel_tracking<true> or ilist_sentinel_tracking<false>
to control whether there's a bit on ilist_node "prev" pointer
indicating whether it's the sentinel. The default behaviour is to
use a bit if and only if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS.
2. Pass ilist_tag<TagA> and ilist_tag<TagB> to allow insertion of a
single node into two different lists (simultaneously).
I have an immediate use-case for (1) ilist_sentinel_tracking: fixing the
validation semantics of MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator to match
ilist::reverse_iterator (ala r280032: see the comments at the end of the
commit message there). I'm adding (2) ilist_tag in the same commit to
validate that the options framework supports expansion. Justin Bogner
mentioned this might enable a possible cleanup in SelectionDAG, but I'll
leave this to others to explore. In the meantime, the unit tests and
the comments for simple_ilist and ilist_node have usage examples.
Note that there's a layer of indirection to support optional,
out-of-order, template paramaters. Internal classes are templated on an
instantiation of the non-variadic ilist_detail::node_options.
User-facing classes use ilist_detail::compute_node_options to compute
the correct instantiation of ilist_detail::node_options.
The comments for ilist_detail::is_valid_option describe how to add new
options (e.g., ilist_packed_int<int NumBits>).
llvm-svn: 281167
... and make a few ilist-internal API changes, in preparation for
changing how ilist_node is templated. The only effect for ilist users
should be changing the friend target from llvm::ilist_node_access to
llvm::ilist_detail::NodeAccess (which is only necessary when they
inherit privately from ilist_node).
- Split out SpecificNodeAccess, which has overloads of getNodePtr and
getValuePtr that are untemplated.
- Use more typedefs to prevent more changes later.
- Force inheritance to use *NodeAccess (to emphasize that ilist *users*
shouldn't be doing this).
There should be no functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 281142
mapping a yaml field to an object in code has always been
a stateless operation. You could still pass state by using the
`setContext` function of the YAMLIO object, but this represented
global state for the entire yaml input. In order to have
context-sensitive state, it is necessary to pass this state in
at the granularity of an individual mapping.
This patch adds support for this type of context-sensitive state.
You simply pass an additional argument of type T to the
`mapRequired` or `mapOptional` functions, and provided you have
specialized a `MappingContextTraits<U, T>` class with the
appropriate mapping function, you can pass this context into
the mapping function.
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24162
llvm-svn: 280977
In the top-level CMakeLists.txt, we set CMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH to ON,
and then for the unit tests we set it to <test>/../../lib. This works for tests
that live in unittest/<whatever>, but not for those that live in subdirectories
e.g. unittest/Transforms/IPO or unittest/ExecutionEngine/Orc. When building
with BUILD_SHARED_LIBRARIES, such tests don't manage to find their libraries.
Since the tests are run from the build directory, it makes sense to set their
RPATH for the build tree, rather than the install tree. This is the default in
CMake since 2.6, so all we have to do is set CMAKE_BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH to
OFF for the unit tests.
llvm-svn: 280791
Use ADT/BitmaskEnum for DINode::DIFlags for the following purposes:
Get rid of unsigned int for flags to avoid problems on platforms with sizeof(int) < 4
Flags are now strongly typed
Patch by: Victor Leschuk <vleschuk@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23766
llvm-svn: 280700
Use ADT/BitmaskEnum for DINode::DIFlags for the following purposes:
* Get rid of unsigned int for flags to avoid problems on platforms with sizeof(int) < 4
* Flags are now strongly typed
Patch by: Victor Leschuk <vleschuk@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23766
llvm-svn: 280686
This was mistakenly committed. The world isn't ready for this test, the
test code has horrible debugging code in it that should never have
landed in tree, it currently passes because of bugs elsewhere, and it
needs to be rewritten to not be susceptible to passing for the wrong
reasons.
I'll re-land this in a better form when the prerequisite patches land.
So sorry that I got this mixed into a series of commits that *were*
ready to land. I shouldn't have. =[ What's worse is that it stuck around
for so long and I discovered it while fixing the underlying bug that
caused it to pass.
llvm-svn: 280620
This test was using the wrong type, and so not actually testing much.
ilist_iterator constructors weren't going through ilist_node_access, so
they didn't actually work with private inheritance.
llvm-svn: 280564
constructor when trying to do copy construction by adding an explicit
move constructor.
Will watch the bots to discover if this is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 280479
Crash was possible if match() method
was called on object that was moved or object
created with empty constructor.
Testcases updated.
DIfferential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24123
llvm-svn: 280473
This wasn't really well explicitly tested with a nice unittest before.
It seems good to have reasonably broken out unittests for this kind of
functionality as I'm workin go other invalidation features to make sure
none of the existing ones regress.
This still has too much duplicated code, I plan to factor that out in
a subsequent commit to use common helpers for repeated parts of this.
llvm-svn: 280447
If we failed to commit the buffer but did not die to a signal, the temp
file would remain on disk on Windows. Having an open file mapping and
file handle prevents the file from being deleted. I am choosing not to
add an assertion of success on the temp file removal, since virus
scanners and other environmental things can often cause removal to fail
in real world tools.
Also fix more temp file leaks in unit tests.
llvm-svn: 280445
passes.
This simplifies the test some and makes it more focused and clear what
is being tested. It will also make it much easier to extend with further
testing of different pass behaviors.
I've also replaced a pointless module pass with running the requires
pass directly as that is all that it was really doing.
llvm-svn: 280444
