I have added a new file:
llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/README
that describes what to do in the event one of the SVE codegen tests
fails the warnings check. In addition, I've added comments to all
the relevant SVE tests pointing users at the README file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83467
There are now quite a few SVE tests in LLVM and Clang that do not
emit warnings related to invalid use of EVT::getVectorNumElements()
and VectorType::getNumElements(). For these tests I have added
additional checks that there are no warnings in order to prevent
any future regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80712
There are now quite a few SVE tests in LLVM and Clang that do not
emit warnings related to invalid use of EVT::getVectorNumElements()
and VectorType::getNumElements(). For these tests I have added
additional checks that there are no warnings in order to prevent
any future regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80712
Instead of loading from e.g. `<vscale x 16 x i8>*`, load from element
pointer `i8*`. This is more in line with the other load/store
intrinsics for SVE.
Reviewers: fpetrogalli, c-rhodes, rengolin, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81458
This reverts commit 17b1869b72f30f2702cb1abd7222027082e49eb6.
It is an attempt to fix the failure reported at
The patch differs from the original one reviwed at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77435 only for the use of the std::make_tuple
in building the return value of `findAddrModeSVELoadStore`:
- return {IsRegReg ? Opc_rr : Opc_ri, NewBase, NewOffset};
+ return std::make_tuple(IsRegReg ? Opc_rr : Opc_ri, NewBase,
the original patch submitted at
fc4e954ed5
was failing the following build:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-armv7-linux-build-cache/builds/29420/
with error:
/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-armv7-linux-build-cache/llvm/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelDAGToDAG.cpp
/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-armv7-linux-build-cache/llvm/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelDAGToDAG.cpp:1439:10:
error: chosen constructor is explicit in copy-initialization
return {IsRegReg ? Opc_rr : Opc_ri, NewBase, NewOffset};
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/5.4.0/../../../../include/c++/5.4.0/tuple:479:19:
note: explicit constructor declared here
constexpr tuple(_UElements&&... __elements)
^
1 error generated.
