pointer.
mwaitx uses EBX as one of its argument.
Using this instruction clobbers RBX as it is defined to hold one of the
input. When the backend uses dynamically allocated stack, RBX is used as
a reserved register for the base pointer.
This patch is adapted from @qcolombet patch for cmpxchg at r263325.
This fixes PR43528.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73475
The documentation was missing a '*/' in '/*<2x32-bit> vadd {0, 64, VPR}',
and the example code are now aligned to improve readability.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86201
When optimizing the table, PointerToAnyOperandMatchers would be
incorrectly reported as identical even though they have different
SizeInBits values. This bug was due to failing to overload the
isIdentical() method, which this patch addresses.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86199
Intrinsic properties can now be set to default and applied to all
intrinsics. If the attributes are not needed, the user can opt-out by
setting the DisableDefaultAttributes flag to true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70365
The switch in AArch64Operand::print was changed in D45688 so the shift
can be printed after printing the register. This is implemented with
LLVM_FALLTHROUGH and was broken in D52485 when BTIHint was put between
the register and shift operands.
Reviewed By: ostannard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86535
This fixes an issue where the restore point of callee-saves in the
function epilogues was incorrectly calculated when the basic block
consisted of only a RET instruction. This caused dealloc instructions
to be inserted in between the block of callee-save restore instructions,
rather than before it.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86099
Currently `strace llvm-dwarfdump x.debug >/tmp/file`:
ioctl(1, TCGETS, 0x7ffd64d7f340) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
write(1, " DW_AT_decl_line\t(89)\n"..., 4096) = 4096
ioctl(1, TCGETS, 0x7ffd64d7f400) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
ioctl(1, TCGETS, 0x7ffd64d7f410) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
ioctl(1, TCGETS, 0x7ffd64d7f400) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
After this patch:
write(1, "0000000000001102 \"strlen\")\n "..., 4096) = 4096
write(1, "site\n DW_AT_low"..., 4096) = 4096
write(1, "d53)\n\n0x000e4d4d: DW_TAG_G"..., 4096) = 4096
The same speedup can be achieved by `--color=0` but that is not much convenient.
This implementation has been suggested by Joerg Sonnenberger.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86406
This patch produces an edge-based interface in AAIsDead.
By this, we can query a set of basic blocks that are directly reachable from a given basic block.
This is specifically useful for implementation of AAReachability.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85547
While since D86306 we do it's sibling fold for `insertvalue`,
we should also do this for `extractvalue`'s.
And unlike that one, the results here are, quite honestly, shocking,
as it can be observed here on vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed results:
```
| statistic name | baseline | proposed | Δ | % | |%| |
|----------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|--------:|--------:|-------:|
| asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 7945095 | 7942507 | -2588 | -0.03% | 0.03% |
| assembler.ObjectBytes | 273209920 | 273069800 | -140120 | -0.05% | 0.05% |
| early-cse.NumCSE | 2183363 | 2183398 | 35 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| early-cse.NumSimplify | 541847 | 550017 | 8170 | 1.51% | 1.51% |
| instcombine.NumAggregateReconstructionsSimplified | 2139 | 108 | -2031 | -94.95% | 94.95% |
| instcombine.NumCombined | 3601364 | 3635448 | 34084 | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| instcombine.NumConstProp | 27153 | 27157 | 4 | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| instcombine.NumDeadInst | 1694521 | 1765022 | 70501 | 4.16% | 4.16% |
| instcombine.NumPHIsOfExtractValues | 0 | 37546 | 37546 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| instcombine.NumSunkInst | 63158 | 63686 | 528 | 0.84% | 0.84% |
| instcount.NumBrInst | 874304 | 871857 | -2447 | -0.28% | 0.28% |
| instcount.NumCallInst | 1757657 | 1758402 | 745 | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| instcount.NumExtractValueInst | 45623 | 11483 | -34140 | -74.83% | 74.83% |
| instcount.NumInsertValueInst | 4983 | 580 | -4403 | -88.36% | 88.36% |
| instcount.NumInvokeInst | 61018 | 59478 | -1540 | -2.52% | 2.52% |
| instcount.NumLandingPadInst | 35334 | 34215 | -1119 | -3.17% | 3.17% |
| instcount.NumPHIInst | 344428 | 331116 | -13312 | -3.86% | 3.86% |
| instcount.NumRetInst | 100773 | 100772 | -1 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| instcount.TotalBlocks | 1081154 | 1077166 | -3988 | -0.37% | 0.37% |
| instcount.TotalFuncs | 101443 | 101442 | -1 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| instcount.TotalInsts | 8890201 | 8833747 | -56454 | -0.64% | 0.64% |
| instsimplify.NumSimplified | 75822 | 75707 | -115 | -0.15% | 0.15% |
| simplifycfg.NumHoistCommonCode | 24203 | 24197 | -6 | -0.02% | 0.02% |
| simplifycfg.NumHoistCommonInstrs | 48201 | 48195 | -6 | -0.01% | 0.01% |
| simplifycfg.NumInvokes | 2785 | 4298 | 1513 | 54.33% | 54.33% |
| simplifycfg.NumSimpl | 997332 | 1018189 | 20857 | 2.09% | 2.09% |
| simplifycfg.NumSinkCommonCode | 7088 | 6464 | -624 | -8.80% | 8.80% |
| simplifycfg.NumSinkCommonInstrs | 15117 | 14021 | -1096 | -7.25% | 7.25% |
```
... which tells us that this new fold fires whopping 38k times,
increasing the amount of SimplifyCFG's `invoke`->`call` transforms by +54% (+1513) (again, D85787 did that last time),
decreasing total instruction count by -0.64% (-56454),
and sharply decreasing count of `insertvalue`'s (-88.36%, i.e. 9 times less)
and `extractvalue`'s (-74.83%, i.e. four times less).
This causes geomean -0.01% binary size decrease
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=4d5ca22b8adfb6643466e4e9f48ba14bb48938bc&to=97dacca0111cb2ae678204e52a3cee00e3a69208&stat=size-text
and, ignoring `O0-g`, is a geomean -0.01%..-0.05% compile-time improvement
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=4d5ca22b8adfb6643466e4e9f48ba14bb48938bc&to=97dacca0111cb2ae678204e52a3cee00e3a69208&stat=instructions
The other thing that tells is, is that while this is a massive win for `invoke`->`call` transform
`InstCombinerImpl::foldAggregateConstructionIntoAggregateReuse()` fold,
which is supposed to be dealing with such aggregate reconstructions,
fires a lot less now. There are two reasons why:
1. After this fold, as it can be seen in tests, we may (will) end up with trivially redundant PHI nodes.
We don't CSE them in InstCombine presently, which means that EarlyCSE needs to run and then InstCombine rerun.
2. But then, EarlyCSE not only manages to fold such redundant PHI's,
it also sees that the extract-insert chain recreates the original aggregate,
and replaces it with the original aggregate.
The take-aways are
1. We maybe should do most trivial, same-BB PHI CSE in InstCombine
2. I need to check if what other patterns remain, and how they can be resolved.
(i.e. i wonder if `foldAggregateConstructionIntoAggregateReuse()` might go away)
This is a reland of the original commit fcb51d8c2460faa23b71e06abb7e826243887dd6,
because originally i forgot to ensure that the base aggregate types match.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86530
Update the comment stating the aim of the test - this is currently
only checking that these assembler directives doesn't cause the
assembler to fail, but the results of the testcase aren't particularly
correct yet.
Remove bits of the testcase that are even less likely to be found in
the wild (the .seh_startchained/.seh_endchained block), where the
testcase currently doesn't really generate anything interesting
anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86524
This reverts commit fcb51d8c2460faa23b71e06abb7e826243887dd6.
As buildbots report, there's apparently some missing check to ensure
that the types of incoming values match the type of PHI.
Let's revert for a moment.
While since D86306 we do it's sibling fold for `insertvalue`,
we should also do this for `extractvalue`'s.
And unlike that one, the results here are, quite honestly, shocking,
as it can be observed here on vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed results:
```
| statistic name | baseline | proposed | Δ | % | |%| |
|----------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|--------:|--------:|-------:|
| asm-printer.EmittedInsts | 7945095 | 7942507 | -2588 | -0.03% | 0.03% |
| assembler.ObjectBytes | 273209920 | 273069800 | -140120 | -0.05% | 0.05% |
| early-cse.NumCSE | 2183363 | 2183398 | 35 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| early-cse.NumSimplify | 541847 | 550017 | 8170 | 1.51% | 1.51% |
| instcombine.NumAggregateReconstructionsSimplified | 2139 | 108 | -2031 | -94.95% | 94.95% |
| instcombine.NumCombined | 3601364 | 3635448 | 34084 | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| instcombine.NumConstProp | 27153 | 27157 | 4 | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| instcombine.NumDeadInst | 1694521 | 1765022 | 70501 | 4.16% | 4.16% |
| instcombine.NumPHIsOfExtractValues | 0 | 37546 | 37546 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| instcombine.NumSunkInst | 63158 | 63686 | 528 | 0.84% | 0.84% |
| instcount.NumBrInst | 874304 | 871857 | -2447 | -0.28% | 0.28% |
| instcount.NumCallInst | 1757657 | 1758402 | 745 | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| instcount.NumExtractValueInst | 45623 | 11483 | -34140 | -74.83% | 74.83% |
| instcount.NumInsertValueInst | 4983 | 580 | -4403 | -88.36% | 88.36% |
| instcount.NumInvokeInst | 61018 | 59478 | -1540 | -2.52% | 2.52% |
| instcount.NumLandingPadInst | 35334 | 34215 | -1119 | -3.17% | 3.17% |
| instcount.NumPHIInst | 344428 | 331116 | -13312 | -3.86% | 3.86% |
| instcount.NumRetInst | 100773 | 100772 | -1 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| instcount.TotalBlocks | 1081154 | 1077166 | -3988 | -0.37% | 0.37% |
| instcount.TotalFuncs | 101443 | 101442 | -1 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| instcount.TotalInsts | 8890201 | 8833747 | -56454 | -0.64% | 0.64% |
| instsimplify.NumSimplified | 75822 | 75707 | -115 | -0.15% | 0.15% |
| simplifycfg.NumHoistCommonCode | 24203 | 24197 | -6 | -0.02% | 0.02% |
| simplifycfg.NumHoistCommonInstrs | 48201 | 48195 | -6 | -0.01% | 0.01% |
| simplifycfg.NumInvokes | 2785 | 4298 | 1513 | 54.33% | 54.33% |
| simplifycfg.NumSimpl | 997332 | 1018189 | 20857 | 2.09% | 2.09% |
| simplifycfg.NumSinkCommonCode | 7088 | 6464 | -624 | -8.80% | 8.80% |
| simplifycfg.NumSinkCommonInstrs | 15117 | 14021 | -1096 | -7.25% | 7.25% |
```
... which tells us that this new fold fires whopping 38k times,
increasing the amount of SimplifyCFG's `invoke`->`call` transforms by +54% (+1513) (again, D85787 did that last time),
decreasing total instruction count by -0.64% (-56454),
and sharply decreasing count of `insertvalue`'s (-88.36%, i.e. 9 times less)
and `extractvalue`'s (-74.83%, i.e. four times less).
This causes geomean -0.01% binary size decrease
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=4d5ca22b8adfb6643466e4e9f48ba14bb48938bc&to=97dacca0111cb2ae678204e52a3cee00e3a69208&stat=size-text
and, ignoring `O0-g`, is a geomean -0.01%..-0.05% compile-time improvement
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=4d5ca22b8adfb6643466e4e9f48ba14bb48938bc&to=97dacca0111cb2ae678204e52a3cee00e3a69208&stat=instructions
The other thing that tells is, is that while this is a massive win for `invoke`->`call` transform
`InstCombinerImpl::foldAggregateConstructionIntoAggregateReuse()` fold,
which is supposed to be dealing with such aggregate reconstructions,
fires a lot less now. There are two reasons why:
1. After this fold, as it can be seen in tests, we may (will) end up with trivially redundant PHI nodes.
We don't CSE them in InstCombine presently, which means that EarlyCSE needs to run and then InstCombine rerun.
2. But then, EarlyCSE not only manages to fold such redundant PHI's,
it also sees that the extract-insert chain recreates the original aggregate,
and replaces it with the original aggregate.
The take-aways are
1. We maybe should do most trivial, same-BB PHI CSE in InstCombine
2. I need to check if what other patterns remain, and how they can be resolved.
(i.e. i wonder if `foldAggregateConstructionIntoAggregateReuse()` might go away)
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86530
This happens when using -flto and -Wl,--plugin-opt=emit-llvm to create a linked LTO bitcode file, and the bitcode file has a strtab with size > 2^29.
All the issues relate to a pattern like this
size_t x64 = y64 + z32 * C
When z32 is >= (2^32)/C, z32 * C overflows.
Reviewed-by: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86500
A Mach-O universal binary may contain bitcode as a slice.
This diff adds proper handling of such binaries to llvm-lipo.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85740
Since we can only copy to GR32 we had to EXTRACT from GR32, but
we would first go to GR16 and then the truncate would extra again
to GR8. This adds a special case to go directly from GR32 to GR8.
This would eventually get cleaned up, but though maybe we should
avoid doing it in the first place. Our k-register handling is weird
and we could probably stand to have some more special ISD nodes
for the conversions so the i32 type would be explicit.
The IsExtractedElement already called getOperand(0) so Extract
here is the source vector. We shouldn't call getOperand(0). This
worked for the original test cases because the result was a
bitcast so the getOperand(0) accidently peeked through the bitcast
which is what we wanted.
In the failing case here, the operand turns out to be undef so
the getOperand(0) asserts because undef has no operands.
Fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=25184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86428
KMOVWkr produces VK16, there's no reason to copy it to VK16 again.
Test changes are presumably because we were scheduling based on
the COPY that is no longer there.
We only need the C++ type and the corresponding TF Enum. The other
parameter was used for the output spec json file, but we can just
standardize on the C++ type name there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86549
There are two ways .llvmbc can be produced:
* clang -c -fembed-bitcode=all (which also produces .llvmcmd)
* LTO backend: ld.lld -mllvm -lto-embed-bitcode or -plugin-opt=-lto-embed-bitcode
.llvmbc and .llvmcmd have the SHF_ALLOC flag, so they can be dropped by
--gc-sections.
This patch sets SectionKind::Metadata to drop the SHF_ALLOC flag. This
is conceptually correct: the two sections are not part of the process
image, so SHF_ALLOC is not appropriate.
`test/LTO/X86/embed-bitcode.ll`: changed `llvm-objcopy -O binary --only-section` to
`llvm-objcopy --dump-section`. `-O binary` does not dump non-SHF_ALLOC sections.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86374
This patch helps getGuaranteedNonPoisonOp find multiple non-poison operands.
Instead of special-casing llvm.assume, I think it is also a viable option to
add noundef to Intrinsics.td. If it makes sense, I'll make a patch for that.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86477
We're not changing IR while running a single MemDep query, so it's
safe to cache alias analysis results using BatchAA. This adds BatchAA
usage to getSimplePointerDependencyFrom(), which is non-intrusive --
covering larger parts (like a whole processNonLocalLoad query) is
also possible, but requires threading BatchAA through a bunch of APIs.
For the ThinLTO configuration, this is a 1% geomean improvement on CTMark.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85583
including printing them.
Reviewers: andreadb, lebedev.ri
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86390
Introduces a new base class "InstructionView" that such views derive from.
Other views still use the "View" base class.
The legacy LoopVectorize has a dependency on InjectTLIMappingsLegacy.
That cannot be expressed in the new PM since they are both normal
passes. Explicitly add -inject-tli-mappings as a pass.
Follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D86492.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86561
Dead function has its body stripped away, and can cause various
analyses to panic. Also it does not make sense to apply analyses on
such function.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, MaskRay, wenlei, hoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84715
The legacy SLPVectorizer has a dependency on InjectTLIMappingsLegacy.
That cannot be expressed in the new PM since they are both normal
passes. Explicitly add -inject-tli-mappings as a pass.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86492
Summary: The LCSSA pass (required for all loop passes) sometimes adds
additional blocks containing LCSSA variables, and checkLoopsStructure
may return false even when the loops are perfectly nested in this case.
This is because the successor of the exit block of the inner loop now
points to the LCSSA block instead of the latch block of the outer loop.
Examples are shown in the test nests-with-lcssa.ll.
To fix the issue, the successor of the exit block of the inner loop can
now point to a block in which all instructions are LCSSA phi node
(except the terminator), and the sole successor of that block should
point to the latch block of the outer loop.
Reviewed By: Whitney, etiotto
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86133
A first version of get.active.lane.mask was committed in rG7fb8a40e5220. One of
the main purposes and uses of this intrinsic is to communicate information from
the middle-end to the back-end, but its current definition and semantics make
this actually very difficult. The intrinsic was defined as:
@llvm.get.active.lane.mask(%IV, %BTC)
where %BTC is the Backedge-Taken Count (variable names are different in the
LangRef spec). This allows to implicitly communicate the loop tripcount, which
can be reconstructed by calculating BTC + 1. But it has been very difficult to
prove that calculating BTC + 1 is safe and doesn't overflow. We need
complicated range and SCEV analysis, and thus the problem is that this
intrinsic isn't really doing what it was supposed to solve. Examples of the
overflow checks that are required in the (ARM) back-end are D79175 and D86074,
which aren't even complete/correct yet.
To solve this problem, we are revising the definitions/semantics for
get.active.lane.mask to avoid all the complicated overflow analysis. This means
that instead of communicating the BTC, we are now using the loop tripcount. Now
using LangRef's variable names, its semantics is changed from:
icmp ule (%base + i), %n
to:
icmp ult (%base + i), %n
with %n > 0 and corresponding to the loop tripcount. The intrinsic signature
remains the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86147
The 1st attempt (rG557b890) was reverted because it caused miscompiles.
That bug is avoided here by changing the order of folds and as verified
in the new tests.
Original commit message:
InstCombine currently has odd rules for folding insert-extract chains to shuffles,
so we miss collapsing seemingly simple cases as shown in the tests here.
But poison makes this not quite as easy as we might have guessed. Alive2 tests to
show the subtle difference (similar to the regression tests):
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/hp4hv3 (this is ok)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ehEWaN (poison leakage)
SLP tends to create these patterns (as shown in the SLP tests), and this could
help with solving PR16739.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86460
The 1st draft of D86460 (reverted) would show miscompiles with these tests
because the undef element tracking went wrong and became visible in the
shuffle masks.
This adapts the verifier checks for intrinsic get.active.lane.mask to the new
semantics of it as described in D86147. I.e., the second argument %n, which
corresponds to the loop tripcount, must be greater than 0 if it is a constant,
so check that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86301
This patch makes the 'Attributes' field optional. We don't need to
explicitly specify the 'Attributes' field in the future.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86537
