Instead of creating a Constant and then calling m_APInt with it (which will always return true). Just create an APInt initially, and use that for the checks in isSelect01 function. If it turns out we do need the Constant, create it from the APInt.
This is a refactor for a future patch that will do some more checks of the constant values here.
llvm-svn: 312517
builds seem to be having trouble with it.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2/builds/11401
When trying to link lli-child-target, the linker reports missing symbols for
the 'Name' members of 'rpc::Function<OrcRPCNegotiate, FunctionIdT(std::string)>'
(base class for OrcRPCNegotiate) and 'rpc::Function<OrcRPCResponse, void()>'
(base class for OrcRPCResponse), despite there being definitions for these
immediately below the rpc::Function class template.
This looks like the same bug that bit OrcRemoteTargetClient/Server in r286920.
<rdar://problem/34249745>
llvm-svn: 312515
If multiple conditional branches are executed based on the same comparison, we can execute multiple conditional branches based on the result of one comparison on PPC. For example,
if (a == 0) { ... }
else if (a < 0) { ... }
can be executed by one compare and two conditional branches instead of two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch.
This patch identifies a code sequence of the two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch and merge the compares if possible.
To maximize the opportunity, we do canonicalization of code sequence before merging compares.
For the above example, the input for this pass looks like:
cmplwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, -1
bgt 0, .LBB0_4
So, before merging two compares, we canonicalize it as
cmpwi r3, 0 ; cmplwi and cmpwi yield same result for beq
beq 0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi r3, 0 ; greather than -1 means greater or equal to 0
bge 0, .LBB0_4
The generated code should be
cmpwi r3, 0
beq 0, .LBB0_3
bge 0, .LBB0_4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37211
llvm-svn: 312514
This patch introduces RemoteObjectClientLayer and RemoteObjectServerLayer,
which can be used to forward ORC object-layer operations from a JIT stack in
the client to a JIT stack (consisting only of object-layers) in the server.
This is a new way to support remote-JITing in LLVM. The previous approach
(supported by OrcRemoteTargetClient and OrcRemoteTargetServer) used a
remote-mapping memory manager that sat "beneath" the JIT stack and sent
fully-relocated binary blobs to the server. The main advantage of the new
approach is that relocatable objects can be cached on the server and re-used
(if the code that they represent hasn't changed), whereas fully-relocated blobs
can not (since the addresses they have been permanently bound to will change
from run to run).
llvm-svn: 312511
code duplication in the client, and improve error propagation.
This patch moves the OrcRemoteTarget rpc::Function declarations from
OrcRemoteTargetRPCAPI into their own namespaces under llvm::orc::remote so that
they can be used in new contexts (in particular, a remote-object-file adapter
layer that I will commit shortly).
Code duplication in OrcRemoteTargetClient (especially in loops processing the
code, rw-data and ro-data allocations) is removed by moving the loop bodies
into their own functions.
Error propagation is (slightly) improved by adding an ErrorReporter functor to
the OrcRemoteTargetClient -- Errors that can't be returned (because they occur
in destructors, or behind stable APIs that don't provide error returns) can be
sent to the ErrorReporter instead. Some methods in the Client API are also
changed to make better use of the Expected class: returning Expected<T>s rather
than returning Errors and taking T&s to store the results.
llvm-svn: 312500
As noted in PR11210:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
...fixing this should allow us to eliminate x86-specific masked store intrinsics in IR.
(Although more testing will be needed to confirm that.)
llvm-svn: 312496
It solves issue of wrong section index evaluating for ranges when
base address is used.
Based on David Blaikie's patch D36097.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37214
llvm-svn: 312477
Summary:
Improve how MaxVF is computed while taking into account that MaxVF should not be larger than the loop's trip count.
Other than saving on compile-time by pruning the possible MaxVF candidates, this patch fixes pr34438 which exposed the following flow:
1. Short trip count identified -> Don't bail out, set OptForSize:=True to avoid tail-loop and runtime checks.
2. Compute MaxVF returned 16 on a target supporting AVX512.
3. OptForSize -> choose VF:=MaxVF.
4. Bail out because TripCount = 8, VF = 16, TripCount % VF !=0 means we need a tail loop.
With this patch step 2. will choose MaxVF=8 based on TripCount.
Reviewers: Ayal, dorit, mkuper, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37425
llvm-svn: 312472
Debug information can be, and was, corrupted when the runtime
remainder loop was fully unrolled. This is because a !null node can
be created instead of a unique one describing the loop. In this case,
the original node gets incorrectly updated with the NewLoopID
metadata.
In the case when the remainder loop is going to be quickly fully
unrolled, there isn't the need to add loop metadata for it anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37338
llvm-svn: 312471
This reorders some patterns to get tablegen to detect them as duplicates. Tablegen only detects duplicates when creating variants for commutable operations. It does not detect duplicates between the patterns as written in the td file. So we need to ensure all the FMA patterns in the td file are unique.
This also uses null_frag to remove some other unneeded patterns.
llvm-svn: 312470
This uses the capability introduced in r312464 to make SDNode patterns commutable on the first two operands.
This allows us to remove some of the extra FMA patterns that have to put loads and mask operands in different places to cover all cases. This even includes patterns that were missing to support match a load in the first operand with FMA4. Non-broadcast loads with masking for AVX512.
I believe this is causing us to generate some duplicate patterns because tablegen's isomorphism checks don't catch isomorphism between the patterns as written in the td. It only detects isomorphism in the commuted variants it tries to create. The the unmasked 231 and 132 memory forms are isomorphic as written in the td file so we end up keeping both. I think we precommute the 132 pattern to fix this.
We also need a follow up patch to go back to the legacy FMA3 instructions and add patterns to the 231 and 132 forms which we currently don't have.
llvm-svn: 312469
Summary:
This is a re-roll of D36615 which uses PLT relocations in the back-end
to the call to __xray_CustomEvent() when building in -fPIC and
-fxray-instrument mode.
Reviewers: pcc, djasper, bkramer
Subscribers: sdardis, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37373
llvm-svn: 312466
Summary:
Tablegen already supports commutable instrinsics with more than 2 operands. There it just assumes the first two operands are commutable.
I plan to use this to improve the generation of FMA patterns in the X86 backend.
Reviewers: aymanmus, zvi, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37430
llvm-svn: 312464
Ideally we'd be able to emit the SUBREG_TO_REG without the explicit register->register move, but we'd need to be sure the producing operation would select something that guaranteed the upper bits were already zeroed.
llvm-svn: 312450
In a future patch, I plan to teach isel to use a small vector move with implicit zeroing of the upper elements when it sees the (insert_subvector zero, X, 0) pattern.
llvm-svn: 312448
Throughout an effort to strongly check the behavior of CodeGen with the IR shufflevector instruction we generated many tests while predicting the best X86 sequence that may be generated.
This is a subset of the generated tests that we think may add value to our X86 set of tests.
Some of the checks are not optimal and will be changed after fixing:
1. PR34394
2. PR34382
3. PR34380
4. PR34359
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37329
llvm-svn: 312442
The function combineShuffleToVectorExtend in DAGCombine might generate an illegal typed node after "legalize types" phase, causing assertion on non-simple type to fail afterwards.
Adding a type check in case the combine is running after the type legalize pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37330
llvm-svn: 312438
Calling grow may result in an error if, for example, this is a callback
manager for a remote target. We need to be able to return this error to the
callee.
llvm-svn: 312429
This change introduces a subcommand to the llvm-xray tool called
"stacks" which allows for analysing XRay traces provided as inputs and
accounting time to stacks instead of just individual functions. This
gives us a more precise view of where in a program the latency is
actually attributed.
The tool uses a trie data structure to keep track of the caller-callee
relationships as we process the XRay traces. In particular, we keep
track of the function call stack as we enter functions. While we're
doing this we're adding nodes in a trie and indicating a "calls"
relatinship between the caller (current top of the stack) and the callee
(the new top of the stack). When we push function ids onto the stack, we
keep track of the timestamp (TSC) for the enter event.
When exiting functions, we are able to account the duration by getting
the difference between the timestamp of the exit event and the
corresponding entry event in the stack. This works even if we somehow
miss the exit events for intermediary functions (i.e. if the exit event
is not cleanly associated with the enter event at the top of the stack).
The output of the tool currently provides just the top N leaf functions
that contribute the most latency, and the top N stacks that have the
most frequency. In the future we can provide more sophisticated query
mechanisms and potentially an export to database feature to make offline
analysis of the stack traces possible with existing tools.
llvm-svn: 312426
FuzzMutate might not be the best place for these, but it makes more
sense than an entirely new library for now. This will make setting up
fuzz targets with consistent CLI handling easier.
llvm-svn: 312425
