Summary:
There is still room for improvement in the handling of multivalue
nodes in both passes, but the current algorithm is at least correct
and optimizes some simpler cases. In order to make future
optimizations of these passes easier and build confidence that the
current algorithms are correct, this CL also adds a script that
automatically and exhaustively generates interesting multivalue test
cases.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72902
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67133
While investigating some non determinism (CSE doesn't produce wrong
code, it just doesn't CSE some times) in GISel CSE on an out of tree
target, I realized that the core issue was that there were lots of code
that mutates (setReg, setRegClass etc), but doesn't notify observers
(CSE in this case but this could be any other observer). In order to
make the Observer be available in various parts of code and to avoid
having to thread it through various API, the MachineFunction now has the
observer as field. This allows it to be easily used in helper functions
such as constrainOperandRegClass.
Also added some invariant verification method in CSEInfo which can
catch these issues (when CSE is enabled).
Essentially, fold OrderedBasicBlock into BasicBlock, and make it
auto-invalidate the instruction ordering when new instructions are
added. Notably, we don't need to invalidate it when removing
instructions, which is helpful when a pass mostly delete dead
instructions rather than transforming them.
The downside is that Instruction grows from 56 bytes to 64 bytes. The
resulting LLVM code is substantially simpler and automatically handles
invalidation, which makes me think that this is the right speed and size
tradeoff.
The important change is in SymbolTableTraitsImpl.h, where the numbering
is invalidated. Everything else should be straightforward.
We probably want to implement a fancier re-numbering scheme so that
local updates don't invalidate the ordering, but I plan for that to be
future work, maybe for someone else.
Reviewed By: lattner, vsk, fhahn, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51664
There is prior art for this in the code base itself, and a recent
example of this here: c45f8d49897f
This came up in discussion on this review where @maskray was going the
opposite direction:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68772
Given that there is disagreement, we should make a choice and document
it.
Thanks to John McCall for the precise wording.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74515
Summary:
Unlike normal calls, call_indirects have immediate arguments that
caused a MachineVerifier failure without a small tweak to loosen the
verifier's requirements for variadicOpsAreDefs instructions.
One nice thing about the new call_indirects is that they do not need
to participate in the PCALL_INDIRECT mechanism because their post-isel
hook handles moving the function pointer argument and adding the flags
and typeindex arguments itself.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74191
This reverts commit 8acedb595d039f68ad15f9e5f2e6cb79729307e4 and
relands a prerequisite for the patch series culminating in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192.
This reverts commit 649aba93a27170cb03a4b17c98a19b9237a880b8, now that
the approach started there has been shown to be workable in the patch
series culminating in https://reviews.llvm.org/D74192.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44922 (caused by 4698bf145d583e26ed438026ef7fde031ef322b1)
ThreadThroughTwoBasicBlocks assumes PredBBBranch is conditional. The following code can segfault.
AddPHINodeEntriesForMappedBlock(PredBBBranch->getSuccessor(1), PredBB, NewBB,
ValueMapping);
We can also allow unconditional PredBB, but the produced code is not
better.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74747
Summary:
This patch adds a new MVE intrinsics family, `vbrsrq`: vector bit
reverse and shift right. The intrinsics are compiled into the VBRSR
instruction. Two new LLVM IR intrinsics were also added: arm.mve.vbrsr
and arm.mve.vbrsr.predicated.
Reviewers: simon_tatham, dmgreen, ostannard, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74721
The index of an ExtractElementInst is not guaranteed to be a
ConstantInt. It can be any integer value. Check explicitly for
ConstantInts.
The new test cases illustrate scenarios where we crash without
this patch. I've also added another test case to check the matching
of extractelement vector ops works.
Reviewers: RKSimon, ABataev, dtemirbulatov, vporpo
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74758
When simplifying demanded bits, we currently only report the
instruction on which SimplifyDemandedBits was called as changed.
However, this is a recursive call, and the actually modified
instruction will usually be further up the chain. Additionally,
all the intermediate instructions should also be revisited,
as additional combines may be possible after the demanded bits
simplification. We fix this by explicitly adding them back to the
worklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72944
The select-of-cttz transform can currently duplicate cttz intrinsics
and zext/trunc ops. The cause is that it unnecessarily duplicates
the intrinsic and the zext/trunc when setting the "undef_on_zero"
flag to false. However, it's always legal to set the flag from true
to false, so we can make this replacement even if there are extra users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74685
Create preprocessor defines for callee saved floating-point register spill
slots, vector register spill slots, and both 32-bit and 64-bit general
purpose register spill slots. This is an NFC refactor to prepare for
adding ABI compliant callee saves and restores for AIX.
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44754. We already have
a fold that converts icmp (and (ashr X, C3), C2), C1 into
icmp (and C2'), C1', but it imposed overly strict requirements on the
transform.
Relax this by checking that both C2 and C1 don't shift out bits
(in a signed sense) when forming the new constants.
Alive proofs (https://rise4fun.com/Alive/PTz0):
Name: ashr_legal
Pre: ((C2 << C3) >> C3) == C2 && ((C1 << C3) >> C3) == C1
%a = ashr i16 %x, C3
%b = and i16 %a, C2
%c = icmp i16 %b, C1
=>
%d = and i16 %x, C2 << C3
%c = icmp i16 %d, C1 << C3
Name: ashr_shiftout_eq
Pre: ((C2 << C3) >> C3) == C2 && ((C1 << C3) >> C3) != C1
%a = ashr i16 %x, C3
%b = and i16 %a, C2
%c = icmp eq i16 %b, C1
=>
%c = false
Note that >> corresponds to ashr here. The case of an equality
comparison has some special handling in this transform, because
it will form to a true/false result if the condition on the comparison
constant it violated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74294
Implement TargetLowering callback mayBeEmittedAsTailCall for riscv in CodeGenPrepare,
which will duplicate return instructions to enable tailcall optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73699
Summary:
Making `Scale` a `TypeSize` in AArch64InstrInfo::getMemOpInfo,
has the effect that all places where this information is used
(notably, TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset) will need
to consider Scale - and derived, Offset - possibly being scalable.
This patch adds a new operand `bool &OffsetIsScalable` to
TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset and fixes up all
the places where this function is used, to consider the
offset possibly being scalable.
In most cases, this means bailing out because the algorithm does not
(or cannot) support scalable offsets in places where it does some
form of alias checking for example.
Reviewers: rovka, efriedma, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: wuzish, kerbowa, MatzeB, arsenm, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72758
Summary:
Codegen and tests for thread-local storage.
This implements only the general dynamic model due to limitations in nld 2.26.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74718
This patch upstreams support for the AArch64 Armv8-A cpu Cortex-A34.
In detail adding support for:
- mcpu option in clang
- AArch64 Target Features in clang
- llvm AArch64 TargetParser definitions
details of the cpu can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/ip-products/processors/cortex-a/cortex-a34
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: SjoerdMeijer, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits,
llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74483
Change-Id: Ida101fc544ca183a0a0e61a1277c8957855fde0b
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
Followup to D74085.
Replace the use of `report_fatal_error()` with returning the error to
`llvm-exegesis.cpp` and handling it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74325
Summary:
I noticed a small regression in a toy project of mine after applying
D73835, in which instruction names weren't being set properly. In the
example test case included with this patch,
`llvm::IRBuilderBase::CreateAdd` returns an `llvm::Value *` that is then
passed as an argument to `llvm::IRBuilderBase::Insert`. The overloaded
function that is selected for that call then ignores the `Name`
parameter that is given. This patch addresses that issue.
Reviewers: nikic, Meinersbur, nhaehnle, fhahn, thakis, teemperor
Reviewed By: nikic, fhahn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74754
Summary:
Backends should fold the subtraction into the comparison, but not all
seem to. Moreover, on targets where pointers are not integers, such as
CHERI, an integer subtraction is not appropriate. Instead we should just
compare the two pointers directly, as this should work everywhere and
potentially generate more efficient code.
Reviewers: bogner, lebedev.ri, efriedma, t.p.northover, uweigand, sunfish
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74454
There was a short discussion about this:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73484#inline-676942
To summarize:
It is a bit unclear to me why the `DT_SYMENT` tag exist.
LLD has the code that does:
"addInt(DT_SYMENT, sizeof(Elf_Sym));" and I guess other linkers has the same logic.
It is unclear why it can be possible to have other values rather than values of
a size of platform symbol. Seems it is not possible, and atm for me it looks that
this tag should not be used. This patch starts reporting the warning when the
value it contains differs from a symbol size for a 32/64 bit platform for safety.
It keeps the rest of the logic we have unchanged. Before this patch we did not handle
the tag at all.
Differential review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74479
