I'm not sure the comment in the implementation really adds a lot of
value (it's clear that we emit zero when no symbol is provided, but it
doesn't explain why we would do that). Happy to iterate.
llvm-svn: 205386
This removes the magic-number-esque code creating/retrieving the same
label for a debug_loc entry from two places and removes the last small
piece of reusable logic from emitDebugLoc so that there will be less
duplication when refactoring it into two functions (one for debug_loc,
the other for debug_loc.dwo).
llvm-svn: 205382
No other functionality changes, DIBuilder testcase is included in a paired
CFE commit.
This relaxes the assertion in isScopeRef to also accept subclasses of
DIScope.
llvm-svn: 205279
Implement debug_loc.dwo, as well as llvm-dwarfdump support for dumping
this section.
Outlined in the DWARF5 spec and http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebugFission the
debug_loc.dwo section has more variation than the standard debug_loc,
allowing 3 different forms of entry (plus the end of list entry). GCC
seems to, and Clang certainly, only use one form, so I've just
implemented dumping support for that for now.
It wasn't immediately obvious that there was a good refactoring to share
the implementation of dumping support between debug_loc and
debug_loc.dwo, so they're separate for now - ideas welcome or I may come
back to it at some point.
As per a comment in the code, we could choose different forms that may
reduce the number of debug_addr entries we emit, but that will require
further study.
llvm-svn: 204697
This seems excessive - switching section isn't expensive (or if it is
we're already being wasteful, since we emitted the debug_loc section
symbol earlier anyway) and otherwise there's no work that happens in
this function when the list is empty.
llvm-svn: 204696
No functional change intended.
Merging up-front rather than delaying this task until later. This just
seems simpler and more efficient (avoiding growing the debug loc list
only to have to skip over those post-merged entries, etc).
llvm-svn: 204679
This is used to avoid relocations in the dwo file by allowing
DW_AT_ranges specified in debug_info.dwo to be relative to this base
address. (r204667 implements the base-relative DW_AT_ranges side of
this)
llvm-svn: 204672
This removes the debug_ranges relocations from debug_info.dwo (but
doesn't implement the DW_AT_GNU_ranges_base which is also necessary for
correct functioning)
llvm-svn: 204668
Type units have no addresses, so there's no need for DW_AT_addr_base.
This removes another relocation from every skeletal type unit and brings
LLVM's skeletal type units in line with GCC's (containing only
GNU_dwo_name (strp), comp_dir (strp), and GNU_pubnames (flag_present)).
Cary's got some ideas about using str_index in the .o file to reduce
those last two relocations (well, replace two relocations with one
relocation (pointing to the string index) and two indicies)
llvm-svn: 204506
Use the range machinery for DW_AT_ranges and DW_AT_high/lo_pc.
This commit moves us from a single range per subprogram to extending
ranges if we are:
a) In the same section, and
b) In the same enclosing CU.
This means we have more fine grained ranges for compile units, and fewer
ranges overall when we have multiple functions in the same CU
adjacent to each other in the object file.
Also remove all of the earlier hacks around this functionality for
function sections etc. Also update all of the testcases to take into
account the merging functionality.
with a fix for location entries in the debug_loc section:
Make sure that debug loc entries are relative to the low_pc
of the compile unit. This means that when we only have a single
range that the offset should be just relative to the low_pc
of the unit, for multiple ranges for a CU this means that we'll be
relative to 0 which we emit along with DW_AT_ranges.
This mostly shows up with linked binaries, so add a testcase with
multiple CUs so that our location is going to be offset of a CU
with a non-zero low_pc.
llvm-svn: 204377
This commit moves us from a single range per subprogram to extending
ranges if we are:
a) In the same section, and
b) In the same enclosing CU.
This means we have more fine grained ranges for compile units, and fewer
ranges overall when we have multiple functions in the same CU
adjacent to each other in the object file.
Also remove all of the earlier hacks around this functionality for
function sections etc. Also update all of the testcases to take into
account the merging functionality.
llvm-svn: 204277
This isn't a complete fix - it falls back to non-comp_dir when multiple
compile units are in play. Adding a map of comp_dir to table is part of
the more general solution, but I gave up (in the short term) when I
realized I'd also have to calculate the size of each type unit so as to
produce correct DW_AT_stmt_list attributes.
llvm-svn: 204202
This allows us to catch more opportunities for ODR-based type uniquing
during LTO.
Paired commit with CFE which updates some testcases to verify the new
DIBuilder behavior.
llvm-svn: 204106
This removes an attribute (and more importantly, a relocation) from
skeleton type units and removes some unnecessary file names from the
debug_line section that remains in the .o (and linked executable) file.
There's still a few places we could shave off some more space here:
* use compilation dir of the underlying compilation unit (since all the
type units share that compilation dir - though this would be more
complicated in LTO cases where they don't (keep a map of compilation
dir->line table header?))
* Remove some of the unnecessary header fields from the line table since
they're not needed in this situation (about 12 bytes per table).
llvm-svn: 204099
When emitting assembly there's no support for emitting separate line
tables for each compilation unit - so LLVM emits .loc directives
producing a single line table.
Line tables have an implicit directory (index 0) equal to the
compilation directory (DW_AT_comp_dir) of the compilation unit that
references them.
If multiple compilation units (with possibly disparate compilation
directories) reference the same line table, we must avoid relying on
this ambiguous directory.
Achieve this my simply not setting the compilation directory on the line
table when we're in this situation (multiple units while emitting
assembly).
llvm-svn: 204094
We still do a few lookups into the line table mapping in MCContext that
could be factored out into a single lookup (rather than looking it up
once for the table label, once to set the compilation unit, once for
each time we need a file ID, etc... ) but assembly output complicates
that somewhat as we still need a virtual dispatch back to the
MCAsmStreamer in that case.
llvm-svn: 204092
Our handling of compilation directory in DwarfDebug was broken
(incorrectly using the 'last' compilation directory (that of the last
CU in the metadata list) for all function emission in any CU). By moving
this handling down into MCDwarf the issue is fixed as the compilation
dir is tracked correctly per line table.
llvm-svn: 204089
See r204027 for the precursor to this that applied to asm debug info.
This required some non-obvious API changes to handle the case of asm
output (we never go asm->asm so this didn't come up in r204027): the
modification of the file/directory name by MCDwarfLineTableHeader needed
to be reflected in the MCAsmStreamer caller so it could print the
appropriate .file directive, so those StringRef parameters are now
non-const ref (in/out) parameters rather than just const.
llvm-svn: 204069
based on the ODR.
This adds an OdrMemberMap to DwarfDebug which is used to unique C++
member function declarations based on the unique identifier of their
containing class and their mangled name.
We can't use the usual DIRef mechanism here because DIScopes are indexed
using their entire MDNode, including decl_file and decl_line, which need
not be unique (see testcase).
Prior to this change multiple redundant member function declarations would
end up in the same uniqued DW_TAG_class_type.
llvm-svn: 203982
any lexical scopes then go ahead and turn on DW_AT_ranges for the
compile unit since we would be claiming to describe in the CU
a range for which we don't have information in the CU otherwise.
llvm-svn: 203969
I could fold the callers into their one call site, but the indirection
(given how verbose choosing the section is) seemed helpful.
The use of a member function pointer's a bit "tricky", but seems limited
enough, the call sites are simple/clean/clear, and there's only one use.
llvm-svn: 203619
