Imagine we have the following invocation:
`FileCheck -check-prefix=UNKNOWN-PREFIX -implicit-check-not=something`
When the check prefix does not exist it does not fail.
This patch fixes the issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78024
Without this patch, `FILECHECK_OPTS` isn't propagated to FileCheck's
test suite so that `FILECHECK_OPTS` doesn't inadvertently affect test
results by affecting the output of FileCheck calls under test. As a
result, `FILECHECK_OPTS` is useless for debugging FileCheck's test
suite.
In `llvm/test/FileCheck/lit.local.cfg`, this patch provides a new
subsitution, `%ProtectFileCheckOutput`, to address this problem for
both `FILECHECK_OPTS` and the deprecated
`FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE`. The rest of the patch uses
`%ProtectFileCheckOutput` throughout the test suite
Fixes PR40284.
Reviewed By: probinson, thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65121
-v prints all directive pattern matches.
-vv additionally prints info that might be noise to users but that can
be helpful to FileCheck developers.
To maximize code reuse and to make diagnostics more consistent, this
patch also adjusts and extends some of the existing diagnostics.
CHECK-NOT failures now report variables uses. Many more diagnostics
now report the check prefix and kind of directive.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47114
llvm-svn: 336967
Summary:
Add FileCheck -implicit-check-not option which allows specifying a
pattern that should only occur in the input when explicitly matched by a
positive check. This feature allows checking tool diagnostics in a way
clang -verify does it for compiler diagnostics.
The option has been tested on a number of clang-tidy checks, I'll post a link to
the clang-tidy patch to this thread.
Once there's an agreement on the general direction, I can add tests and
documentation.
Reviewers: djasper, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4462
llvm-svn: 212810
