1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-01 00:12:50 +01:00
Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
28edb011c4 Don't break the IV update in TLI::SimplifySetCC().
LSR always tries to make the ICmp in the loop latch use the incremented
induction variable. This allows the induction variable to be kept in a
single register.

When the induction variable limit is equal to the stride,
SimplifySetCC() would break LSR's hard work by transforming:

   (icmp (add iv, stride), stride) --> (cmp iv, 0)

This forced us to use lea for the IC update, preventing the simpler
incl+cmp.

<rdar://problem/7643606>
<rdar://problem/11184260>

llvm-svn: 154119
2012-04-05 20:30:20 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi
ea14fd81c6 test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-loop-exit-cond.ll: Try to appease linux and freebsd bots to specify explicit -mtriple=x86_64-darwin.
I guess it expects -relocation-model=pic.

llvm-svn: 144290
2011-11-10 14:18:59 +00:00
Evan Cheng
4760ff0763 Use a bigger hammer to fix PR11314 by disabling the "forcing two-address
instruction lower optimization" in the pre-RA scheduler.

The optimization, rather the hack, was done before MI use-list was available.
Now we should be able to implement it in a better way, perhaps in the
two-address pass until a MI scheduler is available.

Now that the scheduler has to backtrack to handle call sequences. Adding
artificial scheduling constraints is just not safe. Furthermore, the hack
is not taking all the other scheduling decisions into consideration so it's just
as likely to pessimize code. So I view disabling this optimization goodness
regardless of PR11314.

llvm-svn: 144267
2011-11-10 07:43:16 +00:00
Andrew Trick
e89c19ab7b In the pre-RA scheduler, maintain cmp+br proximity.
This is done by pushing physical register definitions close to their
use, which happens to handle flag definitions if they're not glued to
the branch. This seems to be generally a good thing though, so I
didn't need to add a target hook yet.

The primary motivation is to generate code closer to what people
expect and rule out missed opportunity from enabling macro-op
fusion. As a side benefit, we get several 2-5% gains on x86
benchmarks. There is one regression:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists slows down be -10%. But this is
an independent scheduler bug that will be tracked separately.
See rdar://problem/9283108.

Incidentally, pre-RA scheduling is only half the solution. Fixing the
later passes is tracked by:
<rdar://problem/8932804> [pre-RA-sched] on x86, attempt to schedule CMP/TEST adjacent with condition jump

Fixes:
<rdar://problem/9262453> Scheduler unnecessary break of cmp/jump fusion

llvm-svn: 129508
2011-04-14 05:15:06 +00:00
Eric Christopher
72d7cc25f3 Turn on list-ilp scheduling by default on x86 and x86-64, fix up
testcases accordingly. Some are currently xfailed and will be filed
as bugs to be fixed or understood.

Performance results:

roughly neutral on SPEC
some micro benchmarks in the llvm suite are up between 100 and 150%, only
a pair of regressions that are due to be investigated

john-the-ripper saw:
10% improvement in traditional DES
8% improvement in BSDI DES
59% improvement in FreeBSD MD5
67% improvement in OpenBSD Blowfish
14% improvement in LM DES

Small compile time impact.

llvm-svn: 127208
2011-03-08 02:42:25 +00:00
Dan Gohman
bbd309edaa This test doesn't need the ssp attribute.
llvm-svn: 105440
2010-06-04 00:14:48 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar
a953c39b9e Eliminate uses of %prcontext.
- I'd appreciate it if someone else eyeballs my changes to make sure I captured
   the intent of the test.

llvm-svn: 81083
2009-09-05 11:35:16 +00:00
Evan Cheng
9b27f3ec42 Teach LSR to optimize more loop exit compares, i.e. change them to use postinc iv value. Previously LSR would only optimize those which are in the loop latch block. However, if LSR can prove it is safe (and profitable), it's now possible to change those not in the latch blocks to use postinc values.
Also, if the compare is the only use, LSR would place the iv increment instruction before the compare instead in the latch.

llvm-svn: 71485
2009-05-11 22:33:01 +00:00