It turns out that terminatepad gives little benefit over a cleanuppad
which calls the termination function. This is not sufficient to
implement fully generic filters but MSVC doesn't support them which
makes terminatepad a little over-designed.
Depends on D15478.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15479
llvm-svn: 255522
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
Summary:
This is split out from the ThinLTO metadata mapping patch
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14752.
To avoid needing to parse the module level metadata during function
importing, a new module-level record is added which holds the
number of module-level metadata values. This is required because
metadata value ids are assigned implicitly during parsing, and the
function-level metadata ids start after the module-level metadata ids.
I made a change to this version of the code compared to D14752
in order to add more consistent and thorough assertion checking of the
new record value. We now unconditionally use the record value to
initialize the MDValueList size, and handle it the same in parseMetadata
for all module level metadata cases (lazy loading or not).
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14825
llvm-svn: 253668
Summary:
There are currently two blocks with the METADATA_BLOCK id at module
scope. The first has the module-level metadata values (consisting of
some combination of METADATA_* record codes except for METADATA_KIND).
The second consists only of METADATA_KIND records. The latter is used
only in the METADATA_ATTACHMENT block within function blocks (for
metadata attached to instructions).
For ThinLTO we want to delay the parsing of module level metadata
until all functions have been imported from that module (there is some
bookkeeping used to suture it up when we read it during a post-pass).
However, we do need the METADATA_KIND records when parsing the function
body during importing, since those kinds are used as described above.
To simplify identification and parsing of just the block containing
the metadata kinds, use a different block id (METADATA_KIND_BLOCK_ID).
Support older bitcode without the new block id as well.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14654
llvm-svn: 253154
Processing bitcode from a different LLVM version can lead to
unexpected behavior. The LLVM project guarantees autoupdating
bitcode from a previous minor revision for the same major, but
can't make any promise when reading bitcode generated from a
either a non-released LLVM, a vendor toolchain, or a "future"
LLVM release. This patch aims at being more user-friendly and
allows a bitcode produce to emit an optional block at the
beginning of the bitcode that will contains an opaque string
intended to describe the bitcode producer information. The
bitcode reader will dump this information alongside any error it
reports.
The optional block also includes an "epoch" number, monotonically
increasing when incompatible changes are made to the bitcode. The
reader will reject bitcode whose epoch is different from the one
expected.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13666
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 251325
This reverts commit r250239.
It seems unwanted changes got committed here, and part of
the patch does not seem correct.
For instance RoundUpToAlignment() is called without its returned
value actually used.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 250882
Summary:
Adds support for automatically detecting and printing strings
represented by Array abbrev operands, analogous to the string dumping
performed for Blob abbrev operands.
Enhanced the ThinLTO combined index test to check for the appropriate
module and function strings.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13553
llvm-svn: 249695
Summary:
The bitcode format is described in this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
For more info on ThinLTO see:
https://sites.google.com/site/llvmthinlto
The first customer is ThinLTO, however the data structures are designed
and named more generally based on prior feedback. There are a few
comments regarding how certain interfaces are used by ThinLTO, and the
options added here to gold currently have ThinLTO-specific names as the
behavior they provoke is currently ThinLTO-specific.
This patch includes support for generating per-module function indexes,
the combined index file via the gold plugin, and several tests
(more are included with the associated clang patch D11908).
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13107
llvm-svn: 249270
This reverts commit r247898 (which reverted r247894).
Patch fixed to address two issues exposed by buildbots:
- unused variable warning in NDEBUG mode
- std::initializer_list lifetime issue causing test failures
Original Summary:
Support for including the function bitcode indices in the Value Symbol
Table. This requires writing the VST after the function blocks, which in
turn requires a new VST forward declaration record encoding the offset of
the full VST (which is backpatched to contain the offset after the VST
is written).
This patch also enables the lazy function reader to use the new function
indices out of the VST. This support will be used by ThinLTO as well, which
will be in a follow on patch. Backwards compatibility with older bitcode
files is maintained.
A new test is also included.
The bitcode format (used for the lazy reader as well as the upcoming
ThinLTO patches) came out of discussions with Duncan and others and is
described here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12536
llvm-svn: 247927
Temporarily revert to fix some buildbot issues. One is a minor issue
with a variable unused in NDEBUG mode. More concerning are some test
failures on win7 that I need to dig into.
This reverts commit 4e66a74543459832cfd571db42b4543580ae1d1d.
llvm-svn: 247898
Summary:
Support for including the function bitcode indices in the Value Symbol
Table. This requires writing the VST after the function blocks, which in
turn requires a new VST forward declaration record encoding the offset of
the full VST (which is backpatched to contain the offset after the VST
is written).
This patch also enables the lazy function reader to use the new function
indices out of the VST. This support will be used by ThinLTO as well, which
will be in a follow on patch. Backwards compatibility with older bitcode
files is maintained.
A new test is also included.
The bitcode format (used for the lazy reader as well as the upcoming
ThinLTO patches) came out of discussions with Duncan and others and is
described here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B036uwnWM6RWdnBLakxmeDdOeXc/view
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12536
llvm-svn: 247894
Summary:
Add a `cleanupendpad` instruction, used to mark exceptional exits out of
cleanups (for languages/targets that can abort a cleanup with another
exception). The `cleanupendpad` instruction is similar to the `catchendpad`
instruction in that it is an EH pad which is the target of unwind edges in
the handler and which itself has an unwind edge to the next EH action.
The `cleanupendpad` instruction, similar to `cleanupret` has a `cleanuppad`
argument indicating which cleanup it exits. The unwind successors of a
`cleanuppad`'s `cleanupendpad`s must agree with each other and with its
`cleanupret`s.
Update WinEHPrepare (and docs/tests) to accomodate `cleanupendpad`.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12433
llvm-svn: 246751
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11097
llvm-svn: 243766
Summary:
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, reames, nlewycky, rjmccall
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11041
llvm-svn: 241888
Add all the new `Metadata` codes since LLVM 3.6, and at the same time
follow the precedent set in other blocks by removing the `METADATA_`
prefix from the string output.
llvm-svn: 241016
-dump mode normally omits blob data that contains unprintable characters.
When -show-binary-blobs is passed, it unilaterally escapes all blobs,
allowing those with binary data to be displayed.
llvm-svn: 237276
Like r230414, add bitcode support including backwards compatibility, for
an explicit type parameter to GEP.
At the suggestion of Duncan I tried coalescing the two older bitcodes into a
single new bitcode, though I did hit a wrinkle: I couldn't figure out how to
create an explicit abbreviation for a record with a variable number of
arguments (the indicies to the gep). This means the discriminator between
inbounds and non-inbounds gep is a full variable-length field I believe? Is my
understanding correct? Is there a way to create such an abbreviation? Should I
just use two bitcodes as before?
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7736
llvm-svn: 230415
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
llvm-svn: 225974
This reverts commit r225498 (but leaves r225499, which was a worthy
cleanup).
My plan was to change `DEBUG_LOC` to store the `MDNode` directly rather
than its operands (patch was to go out this morning), but on reflection
it's not clear that it's strictly better. (I had missed that the
current code is unlikely to emit the `MDNode` at all.)
Conflicts:
lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp (due to r225499)
llvm-svn: 225531
This reflects the typelessness of `Metadata` in the bitcode format,
removing types from all metadata operands.
`METADATA_VALUE` represents a `ValueAsMetadata`, and always has two
fields: the type and the value.
`METADATA_NODE` represents an `MDNode`, and unlike `METADATA_OLD_NODE`,
doesn't store types. It stores operands at their ID+1 so that `0` can
reference `nullptr` operands.
Part of PR21532.
llvm-svn: 224073
This allows streams that only use BLOCKINFO for debugging purposes to omit
the block entirely. As long as another stream is available with the correct
BLOCKINFO, the first stream can still be analyzed and dumped.
As part of this commit, BitstreamReader gets a move constructor and move
assignment operator, as well as a takeBlockInfo method.
llvm-svn: 216826
Predict and serialize use-list order in bitcode. This makes the option
`-preserve-bc-use-list-order` work *most* of the time, but this is still
experimental.
- Builds a full value-table up front in the writer, sets up a list of
use-list orders to write out, and discards the table. This is a
simpler first step than determining the order from the various
overlapping IDs of values on-the-fly.
- The shuffles stored in the use-list order list have an unnecessarily
large memory footprint.
- `blockaddress` expressions cause functions to be materialized
out-of-order. For now I've ignored this problem, so use-list orders
will be wrong for constants used by functions that have block
addresses taken. There are a couple of ways to fix this, but I
don't have a concrete plan yet.
- When materializing functions lazily, the use-lists for constants
will not be correct. This use case is out of scope: what should the
use-list order be, if it's incomplete?
This is part of PR5680.
llvm-svn: 214125
This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.
llvm-svn: 203083
directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it
doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis.
Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide
these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the
abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes
obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can
manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven
interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both
caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API.
But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really
confusing structure until that day arrives.
llvm-svn: 199082
Again, tools are trickier to pick the main module header for than
library source files. I've started to follow the pattern of using
LLVMContext.h when it is included as a stub for program source files.
llvm-svn: 169252
