I'm testing out a script that auto-generates the check lines.
It's 98% copied from utils/update_llc_test_checks.py.
If others think this is useful, please let me know.
llvm-svn: 263668
I'm testing out a script that auto-generates the check lines.
It's 98% copied from utils/update_llc_test_checks.py.
If others think this is useful, please let me know.
llvm-svn: 263667
As noted in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26636
This doesn't accomplish anything on its own. It's the first step towards preserving
and using branch weights with selects.
The next step would be to make sure we're propagating the info in all of the other
places where we create selects (SimplifyCFG, InstCombine, etc). I don't think there's
an easy fix to make this happen; we have to look at each transform individually to
determine how to correctly propagate the weights.
Along with that step, we need to then use the weights when making subsequent transform
decisions such as discussed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D16836.
The inliner test is independent but closely related. It verifies that metadata is
preserved when both branches and selects are cloned.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18133
llvm-svn: 263482
DeleteDeadBlock was called indiscriminately, leading to cleanuprets with
undef cleanuppad references.
Instead, try to drain the BB of most of it's instructions if it is
unreachable. We can then remove the BB if it solely consists of a
terminator (and maybe some phis).
llvm-svn: 261731
Cleanuppads may be merged together if one is the only predecessor of the
other in which case a simple transform can be performed: replace the
a cleanupret with a branch and remove an unnecessary cleanuppad.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17459
llvm-svn: 261390
Summary:
Performing this optimization duplicates the call to the convergent
function and adds new control-flow dependencies, which is a no-no.
Reviewers: jingyue
Subscribers: broune, hfinkel, tra, resistor, joker.eph, arsenm, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17128
llvm-svn: 260730
D16251)
Summary:
This is a simpler fix to the problem than the dominator approach in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16251. It adds only values into the gather() while loop
that have been seen before.
The actual endless loop is in the constant compare gather() routine in
Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp. The same value ret.0.off0.i is pushed back into the
queue:
%.ret.0.off0.i = or i1 %.ret.0.off0.i, %cmp10.i
Here is what happens at the IR level:
for.cond.i: ; preds = %if.end6.i,
%if.end.i54
%ix.0.i = phi i32 [ 0, %if.end.i54 ], [ %inc.i55, %if.end6.i ]
%ret.0.off0.i = phi i1 [false, %if.end.i54], [%.ret.0.off0.i, %if.end6.i] <<<
%cmp2.i = icmp ult i32 %ix.0.i, %11
br i1 %cmp2.i, label %for.body.i, label %LBJ_TmpSimpleNeedExt.exit
if.end6.i: ; preds = %for.body.i
%cmp10.i = icmp ugt i32 %conv.i, %add9.i
%.ret.0.off0.i = or i1 %ret.0.off0.i, %cmp10.i <<<
When if.end.i54 gets eliminated which removes the definition of ret.0.off0.i.
The result is the expression %.ret.0.off0.i = or i1 %.ret.0.off0.i, %cmp10.i
(Note the first ‘or’ operand is now %.ret.0.off0.i, and *NOT* %ret.0.off0.i).
And
now there is use of .ret.0.off0.i before a definition which triggers the
“endless” loop in gather():
while(!DFT.empty()) {
V = DFT.pop_back_val(); // V is .ret.0.off0.i
if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V)) {
// If it is a || (or && depending on isEQ), process the operands.
if (I->getOpcode() == (isEQ ? Instruction::Or : Instruction::And)) {
DFT.push_back(I->getOperand(1)); // This is now .ret.0.off0.i also
DFT.push_back(I->getOperand(0));
continue; // “endless loop” for .ret.0.off0.i
}
Reviewers: reames, ahatanak
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16839
llvm-svn: 259730
Change the unnamed label comments like
; <label>:8 ; preds = %1
to
; <label>:8: ; preds = %1
This way lit tests can match [[LABEL]]: in both asserts and no-asserts builds.
llvm-svn: 258993
This is a fix for:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26308
With the switch to using the TTI cost model in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL228826
...it became possible to hit a zero-cost cycle of instructions (gep -> phi -> gep...),
so we need a cap for the recursion in DominatesMergePoint().
A recursion depth parameter was already added for a different reason in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255660
...so we can just set a limit for it.
I pulled "10" out of the air and made it an independent parameter that we can play with.
It might be higher than it needs to be given the currently low default value of
PHINodeFoldingThreshold (2). That's the starting cost value that we enter the recursion
with, and most instructions have cost set to TCC_Basic (1), so I don't think we're going
to speculate more than 2 instructions with the current parameters.
As noted in the review and the TODO comment, we can do better than just limiting recursion
depth.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16637
llvm-svn: 258971
SimplifyCFG tries to turn complex branch conditions into a switch.
Some of it's logic attempts to reason about bitwise arithmetic produced
by InstCombine. InstCombine can turn things like (X == 2) || (X == 3)
into (X & 1) == 2 and so SimplifyCFG tries to detect when this occurs so
that it can produce a switch instruction.
However, the legality checking was not sufficient to determine whether
or not this had occured. Correctly check this case by requiring that
the right-hand side of the comparison be a power of two.
This fixes PR26323.
llvm-svn: 258904
Summary:
This is a fix of D13718. D13718 was committed but then reverted because of the following bug:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25299
This patch fixes the issue shown in the bug.
Reviewers: majnemer, reames
Subscribers: jevinskie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14308
llvm-svn: 257277
In r256814, we managed to remove catchpads which were trivially redudant
because they were the same SSA value. We can do better using the same
algorithm but with a smarter datastructure by hashing the SSA values
within the catchpad and comparing them structurally.
llvm-svn: 256815
Summary:
At least for CoreCLR, a catchpad which immediately executes an
`unreachable` instruction indicates that the exception can never have a
matching type, and so such catchpads can be removed, and so can their
catchswitches if the catchswitch becomes empty.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15846
llvm-svn: 256809
Summary: This patch changes gc.statepoint intrinsic's return type to token type instead of i32 type. Using token types could prevent LLVM to merge different gc.statepoint nodes into PHI nodes and cause further problems with gc relocations. The patch also changes the way on how gc.relocate and gc.result look for their corresponding gc.statepoint on unwind path. The current implementation uses the selector value extracted from a { i8*, i32 } landingpad as a hook to find the gc.statepoint, while the patch directly uses a token type landingpad (http://reviews.llvm.org/D15405) to find the gc.statepoint.
Reviewers: sanjoy, JosephTremoulet, pgavlin, igor-laevsky, mjacob
Subscribers: reames, mjacob, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15662
llvm-svn: 256443
In conditional store merging, we were creating PHIs when we didn't
need to. If the value to be predicated isn't defined in the block
we're predicating, then it doesn't need a PHI at all (because we only
deal with triangles and diamonds, any value not in the predicated BB
must dominate the predicated BB).
This fixes a large code size increase in some benchmarks in a popular embedded benchmark suite.
Now with a fix (and fixed tests) for the conformance issue seen in Chromium.
llvm-svn: 255767
This is the last general step to allow more IR-level speculation with a safety harness in place in CodeGenPrepare.
The intent is to restore the behavior enabled by:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL228826
but prevent bad performance such as:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818
Earlier patches in this sequence:
D12882 (disable SimplifyCFG speculation for expensive instructions)
D13297 (have CGP despeculate expensive ops)
D14630 (have CGP despeculate special versions of cttz/ctlz)
As shown in the test cases, we only have two instructions currently affected: ctz for some x86 and fdiv generally.
Allowing exactly one expensive instruction is a bit of a hack, but it lines up with what is currently implemented
in CGP. If we make the despeculation more general in CGP, we can make the speculation here more liberal.
A follow-up patch will adjust the cost for sqrt and possibly other typically expensive math intrinsics (currently
everything is cheap by default). GPU targets would likely want to override those expensive default costs (just as
they probably should already override the cost of div/rem) because just about any math is cheaper than control-flow
on those targets.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15213
llvm-svn: 255660
It turns out that terminatepad gives little benefit over a cleanuppad
which calls the termination function. This is not sufficient to
implement fully generic filters but MSVC doesn't support them which
makes terminatepad a little over-designed.
Depends on D15478.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15479
llvm-svn: 255522
In conditional store merging, we were creating PHIs when we didn't
need to. If the value to be predicated isn't defined in the block
we're predicating, then it doesn't need a PHI at all (because we only
deal with triangles and diamonds, any value not in the predicated BB
must dominate the predicated BB).
This fixes a large code size increase in some benchmarks in a popular embedded benchmark suite.
llvm-svn: 255489
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
MIPS32 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any MIPS32
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this patch is
that we get this code:
ctlz:
jr $ra
clz $2, $4
cttz:
addiu $1, $4, -1
not $2, $4
and $1, $2, $1
clz $1, $1
addiu $2, $zero, 32
jr $ra
subu $2, $2, $1
Instead of:
ctlz:
beqz $4, $BB0_2
addiu $2, $zero, 32
clz $2, $4
$BB0_2:
jr $ra
nop
cttz:
beqz $4, $BB1_2
addiu $2, $zero, 32
addiu $1, $4, -1
not $2, $4
and $1, $2, $1
clz $1, $1
addiu $2, $zero, 32
subu $2, $2, $1
$BB1_2:
jr $ra
nop
See D14469 for the larger motivation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14500
llvm-svn: 252755
ARM V6T2 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any ARM V6T2
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this patch is
that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
rbit r0, r0
clz r0, r0
bx lr
Instead of:
ctlz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
rbitne r0, r0
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
This will help solve a general speculation/despeculation problem noted in PR24818:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14469
llvm-svn: 252639
AArch64 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any AArch64
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this
patch is that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz w0, w0
ret
cttz:
rbit w8, w0
clz w0, w8
ret
Instead of:
ctlz:
cbz w0, .LBB0_2
clz w0, w0
ret
.LBB0_2:
orr w0, wzr, #0x20
ret
cttz:
cbz w0, .LBB1_2
rbit w8, w0
clz w0, w8
ret
.LBB1_2:
orr w0, wzr, #0x20
ret
See D14469 for the larger motivation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14505
llvm-svn: 252625
This is fix for PR24059.
When we are hoisting instruction above some condition it may turn out
that metadata on this instruction was control dependant on the condition.
This metadata becomes invalid and we need to drop it.
This patch should cover most obvious places of speculative execution (which
I have found by greping isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute). I think there are more
cases but at least this change covers the severe ones.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14398
llvm-svn: 252604
Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.
For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.
This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.
Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.
Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265
llvm-svn: 252219
We can often end up with conditional stores that cannot be speculated. They can come from fairly simple, idiomatic code:
if (c & flag1)
*a = x;
if (c & flag2)
*a = y;
...
There is no dominating or post-dominating store to a, so it is not legal to move the store unconditionally to the end of the sequence and cache the intermediate result in a register, as we would like to.
It is, however, legal to merge the stores together and do the store once:
tmp = undef;
if (c & flag1)
tmp = x;
if (c & flag2)
tmp = y;
if (c & flag1 || c & flag2)
*a = tmp;
The real power in this optimization is that it allows arbitrary length ladders such as these to be completely and trivially if-converted. The typical code I'd expect this to trigger on often uses binary-AND with constants as the condition (as in the above example), which means the ending condition can simply be truncated into a single binary-AND too: 'if (c & (flag1|flag2))'. As in the general case there are bitwise operators here, the ladder can often be optimized further too.
This optimization involves potentially increasing register pressure. Even in the simplest case, the lifetime of the first predicate is extended. This can be elided in some cases such as using binary-AND on constants, but not in the general case. Threading 'tmp' through all branches can also increase register pressure.
The optimization as in this patch is enabled by default but kept in a very conservative mode. It will only optimize if it thinks the resultant code should be if-convertable, and additionally if it can thread 'tmp' through at least one existing PHI, so it will only ever in the worst case create one more PHI and extend the lifetime of a predicate.
This doesn't trigger much in LNT, unfortunately, but it does trigger in a big way in a third party test suite.
llvm-svn: 252051
The most common use case is when eliminating redundant range checks in an example like the following:
c = a[i+1] + a[i];
Note that all the smarts of the transform (the implication engine) is already in ValueTracking and is tested directly through InstructionSimplify.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040
llvm-svn: 251596
CatchReturnInst has side-effects: it runs a destructor. This destructor
could conceivably run forever/call exit/etc. and should not be removed.
llvm-svn: 251461
Summary: Currently SimplifyResume can convert an invoke instruction to a call instruction if its landing pad is trivial. In practice we could have several invoke instructions with trivial landing pads and share a common rethrow block, and in the common rethrow block, all the landing pads join to a phi node. The patch extends SimplifyResume to check the phi of landing pad and their incoming blocks. If any of them is trivial, remove it from the phi node and convert the invoke instruction to a call instruction.
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13718
llvm-svn: 251061
SimplifyTerminatorOnSelect didn't consider the possibility that the
condition might be related to one of PHI nodes.
This fixes PR25267.
llvm-svn: 250922
Turns out this approach is buggy. In discussion about follow on work, Sanjoy pointed out that we could be subject to circular logic problems.
Consider:
if (i u< L) leave()
if ((i + 1) u< L) leave()
print(a[i] + a[i+1])
If we know that L is less than UINT_MAX, we could possible prove (in a control dependent way) that i + 1 does not overflow. This gives us:
if (i u< L) leave()
if ((i +nuw 1) u< L) leave()
print(a[i] + a[i+1])
If we now do the transform this patch proposed, we end up with:
if ((i +nuw 1) u< L) leave_appropriately()
print(a[i] + a[i+1])
That would be a miscompile when i==-1. The problem here is that the control dependent nuw bits got used to prove something about the first condition. That's obviously invalid.
This won't happen today, but since I plan to enhance LVI/CVP with exactly that transform at some point in the not too distant future...
llvm-svn: 250430
Summary:
Factor the code that rewrites invokes to calls and rewrites WinEH
terminators to their "unwind to caller" equivalents into a helper in
Utils/Local, and use it in the three places I'm aware of that need to do
this.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13152
llvm-svn: 248677
...because that's what the cost model was intended to do.
As discussed in D12882, this fix has a temporary unintended consequence for
SimplifyCFG: it causes us to not speculate an fdiv. However, two wrongs make
PR24818 right, and two wrongs make PR24343 act right even though it's really
still wrong.
I intend to correct SimplifyCFG and add to CodeGenPrepare to account for this
cost model change and preserve the righteousness for the bug report cases.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24343
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12882
llvm-svn: 248439
Clang now passes the adjectives as an argument to catchpad.
Getting the CatchObj working is simply a matter of threading another
static alloca through codegen, first as an alloca, then as a frame
index, and finally as a frame offset.
llvm-svn: 247844
The rest of the EH pads are fine, since they have at most one label and
take fewer operands for the personality.
Old catchpad vs. new:
%5 = catchpad [i8* bitcast (i32 ()* @"\01?filt$0@0@main@@" to i8*)] to label %__except.ret.10 unwind label %catchendblock.9
-----
%5 = catchpad [i8* bitcast (i32 ()* @"\01?filt$0@0@main@@" to i8*)]
to label %__except.ret.10 unwind label %catchendblock.9
llvm-svn: 247433
This is a follow up to http://reviews.llvm.org/D11995 implementing the suggestion by Hans.
If we know some of the bits of the value being switched on, we know that the maximum number of unique cases covers the unknown bits. This allows to eliminate switch defaults for large integers (i32) when most bits in the value are known.
Note that I had to make the transform contingent on not having any dead cases. This is conservatively correct with the old code, but required for the new code since we might have a dead case which varies one of the known bits. Counting that towards our number of covering cases would be bad. If we do have dead cases, we'll eliminate them first, then revisit the possibly dead default.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12497
llvm-svn: 247309
