Summary:
Remove empty subclass in the process.
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren, ted
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11045
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241780
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
Summary:
This concludes the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
At this point, the StringRef-form of GNU Triples should only be used in the
public API (including IR serialization) and a couple objects that directly
interact with the API (most notably the Module class). The next step is to
replace these Triple objects with the TargetTuple object that will represent
our authoratative/unambiguous internal equivalent to GNU Triples.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski, ted, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10962
llvm-svn: 241472
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
Summary:
For the moment, TargetMachine::getTargetTriple() still returns a StringRef.
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: ted, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10362
llvm-svn: 239554
Summary:
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10311
llvm-svn: 239467
Summary:
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: echristo, rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10243
llvm-svn: 239464
Summary:
-march=bpf -> host endian
-march=bpf_le -> little endian
-match=bpf_be -> big endian
Test Plan:
v1 was tested by IBM s390 guys and appears to be working there.
It bit rots too fast here.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10177
llvm-svn: 239071
Summary:
This is the first of several patches to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU
triples from the internals of LLVM. After this is complete, GNU triples
will be replaced by a more authoratitive representation in the form of
an LLVM TargetTuple.
Reviewers: rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: ted, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10236
llvm-svn: 239036
The 'off' field of 'struct bpf_insn' is in cpu-endianness,
since the rest is emitted as little endian, make sure
that 'off' field is little endian as well.
llvm-svn: 238038
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
llvm-svn: 236507
per-function subtarget.
Currently, code-gen passes the default or generic subtarget to the constructors
of MCInstPrinter subclasses (see LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile), which
enables some targets (AArch64, ARM, and X86) to change their instprinter's
behavior based on the subtarget feature bits. Since the backend can now use
different subtargets for each function, instprinter has to be changed to use the
per-function subtarget rather than the default subtarget.
This patch takes the first step towards enabling instprinter to change its
behavior based on the per-function subtarget. It adds a bit "PassSubtarget" to
AsmWriter which tells table-gen to pass a reference to MCSubtargetInfo to the
various print methods table-gen auto-generates.
I will follow up with changes to instprinters of AArch64, ARM, and X86.
llvm-svn: 233411
Expose bpf pseudo load instruction via intrinsic. It is used by front-ends that
can encode file descriptors directly into IR instead of relying on relocations.
llvm-svn: 233396
TargetMachine::getSubtargetImpl routines.
This keeps the target independent code free of bare subtarget
calls while the remainder of the backends are migrated, or not
if they don't wish to support per-function subtargets as would
be needed for function multiversioning or LTO of disparate
cpu subarchitecture types, e.g.
clang -msse4.2 -c foo.c -emit-llvm -o foo.bc
clang -c bar.c -emit-llvm -o bar.bc
llvm-link foo.bc bar.bc -o baz.bc
llc baz.bc
and get appropriate code for what the command lines requested.
llvm-svn: 232885
Summary:
I don't know why every singled backend had to redeclare its own DataLayout.
There was a virtual getDataLayout() on the common base TargetMachine, the
default implementation returned nullptr. It was not clear from this that
we could assume at call site that a DataLayout will be available with
each Target.
Now getDataLayout() is no longer virtual and return a pointer to the
DataLayout member of the common base TargetMachine. I plan to turn it into
a reference in a future patch.
The only backend that didn't have a DataLayout previsouly was the CPPBackend.
It now initializes the default DataLayout. This commit is NFC for all the
other backends.
Test Plan: clang+llvm ninja check-all
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jfb, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8243
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231987
time. The target independent code was passing in one all the
time and targets weren't checking validity before using. Update
a few calls to pass in a MachineFunction where necessary.
llvm-svn: 231970
This required plumbing a TargetRegisterInfo through computeRegisterProperties
and into findRepresentativeClass which uses it for register class
iteration. This required passing a subtarget into a few target specific
initializations of TargetLowering.
llvm-svn: 230583
