This is a patch teaching ValueTracking that `s/u*.with.overflow` intrinsics do not
create undef/poison and they propagate poison.
I couldn't write a nice example like the one with ctpop; ValueTrackingTest.cpp were simply updated
to check these instead.
This patch helps reducing regression while fixing https://llvm.org/pr49688 .
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99671
This is similar to D94106, but for the
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor() helper. We should not
assume that readonly functions will return, as this is only true for
mustprogress functions (in which case we already infer willreturn).
As with the DCE change, for now continue assuming that readonly
intrinsics will return, as not all target intrinsics have been
annotated yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95288
Split impliesPoison into two recursive walks, one over V, the
other over ValAssumedPoison. This allows us to reason about poison
implications in a number of additional cases that are important
in practice. This is a generalized form of D94859, which handles
the cmp to cmp implication in particular.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94866
This patch
- Adds containsPoisonElement that checks existence of poison in constant vector elements,
- Renames containsUndefElement to containsUndefOrPoisonElement to clarify its behavior & updates its uses properly
With this patch, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison's tests w.r.t constant vectors are added because its analysis is improved.
Thanks!
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94053
This PR adds impliesPoison(ValAssumedPoison, V) that returns true if V is
poison under the assumption that ValAssumedPoison is poison.
For example, impliesPoison('icmp X, 10', 'icmp X, Y') return true because
'icmp X, Y' is poison if 'icmp X, 10' is poison.
impliesPoison can be used for sound optimization of select, as discussed in
D77868.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78152
This patch updates isImpliedCondition/isKnownNonZero to look into select form of
and/or as well.
See llvm.org/pr48353 and D93065 for more context
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93845
I noticed that alignment was no longer inferred as well after I last merged
our CHERI fork from upstream. I opened this review before seeing that D88669
already fixes the same problem, so this commit simply adds the new test that
I added as part of this change.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89830
Prior to this patch, computeKnownBits would only try to deduce trailing zeros
bits for getelementptrs. This patch adds the logic to treat geps as a series
of add * scaling factor.
Thanks to this patch, using a gep or performing an address computation
directly "by hand" (ptrtoint followed by adds and mul followed by inttoptr)
offers the same computeKnownBits information.
Previously, the "by hand" approach would have given more information.
This is related to https://llvm.org/PR47241.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86364
These tests make sure that the range information is properly
understood during computeKnownBits analysis.
NFC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88934
It was mentioned that D88276 that when a phi node is visited, terminators at their incoming edges should be used for CtxI.
This is a patch that makes two functions (ComputeNumSignBitsImpl, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison) to do so.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88360
This is a patch that allows isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison to return more precise result
when an argument is given, by looking through its uses at the entry block (and following blocks as well, if it is checking poison only).
This is useful when there is a function call with noundef arguments at the entry block.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88207
This implements support for isKnownNonZero, computeKnownBits when freeze is involved.
```
br (x != 0), BB1, BB2
BB1:
y = freeze x
```
In the above program, we can say that y is non-zero. The reason is as follows:
(1) If x was poison, `br (x != 0)` raised UB
(2) If x was fully undef, the branch again raised UB
(3) If x was non-zero partially undef, say `undef | 1`, `freeze x` will return a nondeterministic value which is also non-zero.
(4) If x was just a concrete value, it is trivial
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75808
This patch adds isGuaranteedNotToBePoison and programUndefinedIfUndefOrPoison.
isGuaranteedNotToBePoison will be used at D75808. The latter function is used at isGuaranteedNotToBePoison.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84242
For StackLifetime after finding alloca we need to check that
values ponting to the begining of alloca.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86692
This patch
- adds `canCreateUndefOrPoison`
- refactors `canCreatePoison` so it can deal with constantexprs
`canCreateUndefOrPoison` will be used at D83926.
Reviewed By: nikic, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84007
This patch updates computeConstantRange to optionally take an assumption
cache as argument and use the available assumptions to limit the range
of the result.
Currently this is limited to assumptions that are comparisons.
Reviewers: reames, nikic, spatel, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76193
computeKnownBitsFromAssume() currently asserts if m_V matches a
ptrtoint that changes the bitwidth. Because InstCombine
canonicalizes ptrtoint instructions to use explicit zext/trunc,
we never ran into the issue in practice. I'm adding unit tests,
as I don't know if this can be triggered via IR anywhere.
Fix this by calling anyextOrTrunc(BitWidth) on the computed
KnownBits. Note that we are going from the KnownBits of the
ptrtoint result to the KnownBits of the ptrtoint operand,
so we need to truncate if the ptrtoint zexted and anyext if
the ptrtoint truncated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79234
Summary:
This patch makes propagatesPoison be more accurate by returning true on
more bin ops/unary ops/casts/etc.
The changed test in ScalarEvolution/nsw.ll was introduced by
a19edc4d15 .
IIUC, the goal of the tests is to show that iv.inc's SCEV expression still has
no-overflow flags even if the loop isn't in the wanted form.
It becomes more accurate with this patch, so think this is okay.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, reames, nikic, sanjoy
Reviewed By: spatel, nikic
Subscribers: regehr, nlopes, efriedma, fhahn, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78615
The cmyk test is based on the known regression that resulted from:
rGf2fbdf76d8d0
This improves on the equivalent signed min/max change:
rG867f0c3c4d8c
The underlying icmp equivalence is:
~X pred ~Y --> Y pred X
For an icmp with constant, canonicalization results in a swapped pred:
~X < C --> X > ~C
The cmyk tests are based on the known regression that resulted from:
rGf2fbdf76d8d0
So this improvement in analysis might be enough to restore that commit.
Summary: Vector of the same value with few undefs will sill be considered "Bytewise"
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: dexonsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64031
llvm-svn: 365971
Summary:
This helps with more efficient use of memset for pattern initialization
From @pcc prototype for -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern optimizations
Binary size change on CTMark, (with -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--icf=all, similar results with default linker options)
```
master patch diff
Os 8.238864e+05 8.238864e+05 0.0
O3 1.054797e+06 1.054797e+06 0.0
Os zero 8.292384e+05 8.292384e+05 0.0
O3 zero 1.062626e+06 1.062626e+06 0.0
Os pattern 8.579712e+05 8.338048e+05 -0.030299
O3 pattern 1.090502e+06 1.067574e+06 -0.020481
```
Zero vs Pattern on master
```
zero pattern diff
Os 8.292384e+05 8.579712e+05 0.036578
O3 1.062626e+06 1.090502e+06 0.025124
```
Zero vs Pattern with the patch
```
zero pattern diff
Os 8.292384e+05 8.338048e+05 0.003333
O3 1.062626e+06 1.067574e+06 0.003193
```
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63967
llvm-svn: 365858
Without this gcc 7.4.0 complains with
../unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp:937:66: error: ISO C++11 requires at least one argument for the "..." in a variadic macro [-Werror]
::testing::ValuesIn(IsBytewiseValueTests));
^
llvm-svn: 365738
The `willreturn` function attribute guarantees that a function call will
come back to the call site if the call is also known not to throw.
Therefore, this attribute can be used in
`isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor`.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63372
llvm-svn: 364580
We have two sources of known bits:
1. For adds leading ones of either operand are preserved. For sub
leading zeros of LHS and leading ones of RHS become leading zeros in
the result.
2. The saturating math is a select between add/sub and an all-ones/
zero value. As such we can carry out the add/sub known bits
calculation, and only preseve the known one/zero bits respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58329
llvm-svn: 355223
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
If the shift amount is known, we can determine the known bits of the
output based on the known bits of two inputs.
This is essentially the same functionality as implemented in D54869,
but for ValueTracking rather than InstCombine SimplifyDemandedBits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55140
llvm-svn: 348091
Generalize the existing MatchSelectPatternTest class to also work
with other types of tests. This reduces the amount of boilerplate
necessary to write ValueTracking tests in general, and computeKnownBits
tests in particular.
The inherited convention is that the function must be @test and the
tested instruction %A.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55141
llvm-svn: 348043
In PR39475:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
..we may fail to recognize/simplify fabs() in some cases because we do not
canonicalize fcmp with a -0.0 operand.
Adding that canonicalization can cause regressions on min/max FP tests, so
that's this patch: for the purpose of determining whether something is min/max,
let the value returned by the select determine how we treat a 0.0 operand in the fcmp.
This patch doesn't actually change the -0.0 to +0.0. It just changes the analysis, so
we don't fail to recognize equivalent min/max patterns that only differ in the
signbit of 0.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54001
llvm-svn: 346097
