I am really sorry for the noise, but the current state where some parts of the
code use TD (from the old name: TargetData) and other parts use DL makes it
hard to write a patch that changes where those variables come from and how
they are passed along.
llvm-svn: 201827
r201608 made llvm corretly handle private globals with MachO. r201622 fixed
a bug in it and r201624 and r201625 were changes for using private linkage,
assuming that llvm would do the right thing.
They all got reverted because r201608 introduced a crash in LTO. This patch
includes a fix for that. The issue was that TargetLoweringObjectFile now has
to be initialized before we can mangle names of private globals. This is
trivially true during the normal codegen pipeline (the asm printer does it),
but LTO has to do it manually.
llvm-svn: 201700
flag from clang, and disable zero-base shadow support on all platforms
where it is not the default behavior.
- It is completely unused, as far as we know.
- It is ABI-incompatible with non-zero-base shadow, which means all
objects in a process must be built with the same setting. Failing to
do so results in a segmentation fault at runtime.
- It introduces a backward dependency of compiler-rt on user code,
which is uncommon and complicates testing.
This is the LLVM part of a larger change.
llvm-svn: 199371
This should fix http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17976
Another test checking for the global variables' locations and prefixes on Darwin will be committed separately.
llvm-svn: 198017
Summary:
Before this change the instrumented code before Ret instructions looked like:
<Unpoison Frame Redzones>
if (Frame != OriginalFrame) // I.e. Frame is fake
<Poison Complete Frame>
Now the instrumented code looks like:
if (Frame != OriginalFrame) // I.e. Frame is fake
<Poison Complete Frame>
else
<Unpoison Frame Redzones>
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2458
llvm-svn: 197907
Currently SplitBlockAndInsertIfThen requires that branch condition is an
Instruction itself, which is very inconvenient, because it is sometimes an
Operator, or even a Constant.
llvm-svn: 197677
It was failing because ASan was adding all of the following to one
function:
- dynamic alloca
- stack realignment
- inline asm
This patch avoids making the static alloca dynamic when coverage is
used.
ASan should probably not be inserting empty inline asm blobs to inhibit
duplicate tail elimination.
llvm-svn: 196973
Summary:
Rewrite asan's stack frame layout.
First, most of the stack layout logic is moved into a separte file
to make it more testable and (potentially) useful for other projects.
Second, make the frames more compact by using adaptive redzones
(smaller for small objects, larger for large objects).
Third, try to minimized gaps due to large alignments (this is hypothetical since
today we don't see many stack vars aligned by more than 32).
The frames indeed become more compact, but I'll still need to run more benchmarks
before committing, but I am sking for review now to get early feedback.
This change will be accompanied by a trivial change in compiler-rt tests
to match the new frame sizes.
Reviewers: samsonov, dvyukov
Reviewed By: samsonov
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2324
llvm-svn: 196568
I was able to successfully run a bootstrapped LTO build of clang with
r194701, so this change does not seem to be the cause of our failing
buildbots.
llvm-svn: 194789
This reverts commit 194701. Apple's bootstrapped LTO builds have been failing,
and this change (along with compiler-rt 194702-194704) is the only thing on
the blamelist. I will either reappy these changes or help debug the problem,
depending on whether this fixes the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 194780
Summary:
Given a global array G[N], which is declared in this CU and has static initializer
avoid instrumenting accesses like G[i], where 'i' is a constant and 0<=i<N.
Also add a bit of stats.
This eliminates ~1% of instrumentations on SPEC2006
and also partially helps when asan is being run together with coverage.
Reviewers: samsonov
Reviewed By: samsonov
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1947
llvm-svn: 192794
The globals being generated here were given the 'private' linkage type. However,
this caused them to end up in different sections with the wrong prefix. E.g.,
they would be in the __TEXT,__const section with an 'L' prefix instead of an 'l'
(lowercase ell) prefix.
The problem is that the linker will eat a literal label with 'L'. If a weak
symbol is then placed into the __TEXT,__const section near that literal, then it
cannot distinguish between the literal and the weak symbol.
Part of the problems here was introduced because the address sanitizer converted
some C strings into constant initializers with trailing nuls. (Thus putting them
in the __const section with the wrong prefix.) The others were variables that
the address sanitizer created but simply had the wrong linkage type.
llvm-svn: 187827
This patch provides basic support for powerpc64le as an LLVM target.
However, use of this target will not actually generate little-endian
code. Instead, use of the target will cause the correct little-endian
built-in defines to be generated, so that code that tests for
__LITTLE_ENDIAN__, for example, will be correctly parsed for
syntax-only testing. Code generation will otherwise be the same as
powerpc64 (big-endian), for now.
The patch leaves open the possibility of creating a little-endian
PowerPC64 back end, but there is no immediate intent to create such a
thing.
The LLVM portions of this patch simply add ppc64le coverage everywhere
that ppc64 coverage currently exists. There is nothing of any import
worth testing until such time as little-endian code generation is
implemented. In the corresponding Clang patch, there is a new test
case variant to ensure that correct built-in defines for little-endian
code are generated.
llvm-svn: 187179
A special case list can now specify categories for specific globals,
which can be used to instruct an instrumentation pass to treat certain
functions or global variables in a specific way, such as by omitting
certain aspects of instrumentation while keeping others, or informing
the instrumentation pass that a specific uninstrumentable function
has certain semantics, thus allowing the pass to instrument callers
according to those semantics.
For example, AddressSanitizer now uses the "init" category instead of
global-init prefixes for globals whose initializers should not be
instrumented, but which in all other respects should be instrumented.
The motivating use case is DataFlowSanitizer, which will have a
number of different categories for uninstrumentable functions, such
as "functional" which specifies that a function has pure functional
semantics, or "discard" which indicates that a function's return
value should not be labelled.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1092
llvm-svn: 185978
Before: the function name was stored by the compiler as a constant string
and the run-time was printing it.
Now: the PC is stored instead and the run-time prints the full symbolized frame.
This adds a couple of instructions into every function with non-empty stack frame,
but also reduces the binary size because we store less strings (I saw 2% size reduction).
This change bumps the asan ABI version to v3.
llvm part.
Example of report (now):
==31711==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7fffa77cf1c5 at pc 0x41feb0 bp 0x7fffa77cefb0 sp 0x7fffa77cefa8
READ of size 1 at 0x7fffa77cf1c5 thread T0
#0 0x41feaf in Frame0(int, char*, char*, char*) stack-oob-frames.cc:20
#1 0x41f7ff in Frame1(int, char*, char*) stack-oob-frames.cc:24
#2 0x41f477 in Frame2(int, char*) stack-oob-frames.cc:28
#3 0x41f194 in Frame3(int) stack-oob-frames.cc:32
#4 0x41eee0 in main stack-oob-frames.cc:38
#5 0x7f0c5566f76c (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2176c)
#6 0x41eb1c (/usr/local/google/kcc/llvm_cmake/a.out+0x41eb1c)
Address 0x7fffa77cf1c5 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 293 in frame
#0 0x41f87f in Frame0(int, char*, char*, char*) stack-oob-frames.cc:12 <<<<<<<<<<<<<< this is new
This frame has 6 object(s):
[32, 36) 'frame.addr'
[96, 104) 'a.addr'
[160, 168) 'b.addr'
[224, 232) 'c.addr'
[288, 292) 's'
[352, 360) 'd'
llvm-svn: 177724
