The most likely case where this error happens is when the user specifies
too many register operands. Don't make it look like an internal LLVM bug
when we can see that the error is coming from an inline asm instruction.
For other instructions we keep the "ran out of registers" error.
llvm-svn: 192041
This change fixes the problem reported in pr17380 and re-add the dagcombine
transformation ensuring that the value types are always legal if the
transformation is triggered after Legalization took place.
Added the test case from pr17380.
llvm-svn: 191509
(shl (zext (shr A, X)), X) => (zext (shl (shr A, X), X)).
The rule only triggers when there are no other uses of the
zext to avoid materializing more instructions.
This helps the DAGCombiner understand that the shl/shr
sequence can then be converted into an and instruction.
llvm-svn: 191393
Sometimes a copy from a vreg -> vreg sneaks into the middle of a terminator
sequence. It is safe to slice this into the stack protector success bb.
This fixes PR16979.
llvm-svn: 191260
The recursive nature of the address selection code can cause the stack to
explode if there is a long chain of GEPs. Convert the recursive bit into a
iterative method to avoid this.
<rdar://problem/12445434>
llvm-svn: 191252
Previously, the DAGISel function WalkChainUsers was spotting that it
had entered already-selected territory by whether a node was a
MachineNode (amongst other things). Since it's fairly common practice
to insert MachineNodes during ISelLowering, this was not the correct
check.
Looking around, it seems that other nodes get their NodeId set to -1
upon selection, so this makes sure the same thing happens to all
MachineNodes and uses that characteristic to determine whether we
should stop looking for a loop during selection.
This should fix PR15840.
llvm-svn: 191165
In AVX 256bit vectors are valid vectors and therefore the Type Legalizer doesn't
split the VSELECT and SETCC nodes. AVX only supports MIN/MAX on 128bit vectors
and this fix enables vector splitting for this special case in the X86 DAG
Combiner.
This fix is related to PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/14594431>.
llvm-svn: 191131
The Type Legalizer recognizes that VSELECT needs to be split, because the type
is to wide for the given target. The same does not always apply to SETCC,
because less space is required to encode the result of a comparison. As a result
VSELECT is split and SETCC is unrolled into scalar comparisons.
This commit fixes the issue by checking for VSELECT-SETCC patterns in the DAG
Combiner. If a matching pattern is found, then the result mask of SETCC is
promoted to the expected vector mask for the given target. This mask has usually
te same size as the VSELECT return type (except for Intel KNL). Now the type
legalizer will split both VSELECT and SETCC.
This allows the following X86 DAG Combine code to sucessfully detect the MIN/MAX
pattern. This fixes PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/14594431>.
llvm-svn: 191130
C-like languages promote types like unsigned short to unsigned int before
performing an arithmetic operation. Currently the rotate matcher in the
DAGCombiner does not consider this situation.
This commit extends the DAGCombiner in the way that the pattern
(or (shl ([az]ext x), (*ext y)), (srl ([az]ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y))))
is folded into
([az]ext (rotl x, y))
The matching is restricted to aext and zext because in this cases the upper
bits are either undefined or known. Test case is included.
This fixes PR16726.
llvm-svn: 191049
C-like languages promote types like unsigned short to unsigned int before
performing an arithmetic operation. Currently the rotate matcher in the
DAGCombiner does not consider this situation.
This commit extends the DAGCombiner in the way that the pattern
(or (shl ([az]ext x), (*ext y)), (srl ([az]ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y))))
is folded into
([az]ext (rotl x, y))
The matching is restricted to aext and zext because in this cases the upper
bits are either undefined or known. Test case is included.
This fixes PR16726.
llvm-svn: 191045
When selecting the DAG (add (WrapperRIP ...), (FrameIndex ...)), X86 code had
spotted the FrameIndex possibility and was working out whether it could fold
the WrapperRIP into this.
The test for forming a %rip version is notionally whether we already have a
base or index register (%rip precludes both), but we were forgetting to account
for the register that would be inserted later to access the frame.
rdar://problem/15024520
llvm-svn: 190995
Summary:
We indicate that the object files are safe by emitting a @feat.00
absolute address symbol. The address is presumably interpreted as a
bitfield of features that the compiler would like to enable. Bit 0 is
documented in the PE COFF spec to opt in to "registered SEH", which is
what /safeseh enables.
LLVM's object files are safe by default because LLVM doesn't know how to
produce SEH handlers.
Reviewers: Bigcheese
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1691
llvm-svn: 190898
- check that -mcpu=slm uses the call register indirect optimization
- check that -mcpu=slm runs the scheduler
- check that -mcpu=slm supports the movbe instruction
llvm-svn: 190814
