This patch addresses PR41675, where a stack-pointer variable is dereferenced
too many times by its location expression, presenting a value on the stack as
the pointer to the stack.
The difference between a stack *pointer* DBG_VALUE and one that refers to a
value on the stack, is currently the indirect flag. However the DWARF backend
will also try to guess whether something is a memory location or not, based
on whether there is any computation in the location expression. By simply
prepending the stack offset to existing expressions, we can accidentally
convert a register location into a memory location, which introduces a
suprise (and unintended) dereference.
The solution is to add DW_OP_stack_value whenever we add a DIExpression
computation to a stack *pointer*. It's an implicit location computed on the
expression stack, thus needs to be flagged as a stack_value.
For the edge case where the offset is zero and the location could be a register
location, DIExpression::prepend will still generate opcodes, and thus
DW_OP_stack_value must still be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63429
llvm-svn: 364736
Summary:
Delete the begin-end form because the standard std::partition_point
can be easily used as a replacement.
The ranges-style llvm::bsearch will be renamed to llvm::partition_point
in the next clean-up patch.
The name "bsearch" doesn't meet people's expectation because in C:
> If two or more members compare equal, which member is returned is unspecified.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63718
llvm-svn: 364719
Summary:
Match an integer or vector with every element unsigned less than the
Threshold. For vectors, this includes constants with undefined elements.
FIXME: is it worth generalizing this to simply take ICmpInst::Predicate?
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, nikic
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63811
llvm-svn: 364711
Delete unnecessary getters of AddressRange.
Simplify AddressRange::size(): Start <= End check should be checked in an upper layer.
Delete isContiguousWith() that doesn't make sense.
Simplify AddressRanges::insert. Delete commented code. Fix it when more than 1 ranges are to be deleted.
Delete trailing newline.
llvm-svn: 364637
Introduce llvm.test.set.loop.iterations which sets the loop counter
and also produces an i1 after testing that the count is not zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63809
llvm-svn: 364628
Summary: This patch changes fs::setPermissions to optionally set permissions while respecting the umask. It also adds the function fs::getUmask() which returns the current umask.
Reviewers: jhenderson, rupprecht, aprantl, lhames
Reviewed By: jhenderson, rupprecht
Subscribers: sanaanajjar231288, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63583
llvm-svn: 364621
The new switch lowering code that tries to generate jump tables and range checks
were tested at -O0 on arm64, but on -O3 the generic switch lowering code goes to
town on trying to generate optimized lowerings, e.g. multiple jump tables, range
checks etc. This exposed bugs in the way PHI nodes are handled because the CFG
looks even stranger after all of this is done.
llvm-svn: 364613
Summary:
Current InlineCost is not assignable because of const members Cost and Threshold.
I dont see practical benefits from having them const (access to these members is
private and internal interactions are rather simple). On other hand that makes
it hard to use as a member in some other data structure where assignability is necessary.
I'm going to use InlineCost in a downstream inliner that maintains a complex queue
of candidate call-sites and thus keeping and recalculating InlineCost is necessary.
This patch just removes 'const' from both members, making InlineCost assignable.
Reviewers: eraman, greened, chandlerc, yrouban, apilipenko
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63823
llvm-svn: 364612
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
This is a recommit, the original commit rL364563 was reverted in rL364568
because test-suite detected miscompile - the new comparison constant 'Q'
was being computed incorrectly (we divided by `D0` instead of `D`).
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: dexonsmith, kristina, xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364600
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
Original patch author: @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)!
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364563
This patch introduces a new function attribute, willreturn, to indicate
that a call of this function will either exhibit undefined behavior or
comes back and continues execution at a point in the existing call stack
that includes the current invocation.
This attribute guarantees that the function does not have any endless
loops, endless recursion, or terminating functions like abort or exit.
Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62801
llvm-svn: 364555
We saw a 70% ThinLTO link time increase in Chromium for Android, see
crbug.com/978817. Sounds like more of PR42210.
> Recommit of D32530 with a few small changes:
> - Stopped recursively walking through aggregates in
> the verifier, so that we don't impose too much
> overhead on large modules under LTO (see PR42210).
> - Changed tests to match; the errors are slightly
> different since they only report the array or
> struct that actually contains a scalable vector,
> rather than all aggregates which contain one in
> a nested member.
> - Corrected an older comment
>
> Reviewers: thakis, rengolin, sdesmalen
>
> Reviewed By: sdesmalen
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63321
llvm-svn: 364543
Add the IR and the AsmPrinter parts for handling of the DW_OP_entry_values
DWARF operation.
([11/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60866
llvm-svn: 364542
Handle call instruction replacements and deletions in order to preserve
valid state of the call site info of the MachineFunction.
NOTE: If the call site info is enabled for a new target, the assertion from
the MachineFunction::DeleteMachineInstr() should help to locate places
where the updateCallSiteInfo() should be called in order to preserve valid
state of the call site info.
([10/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61062
llvm-svn: 364536
This allows setting different values for e_shentsize, e_shoff, e_shnum
and e_shstrndx fields and is useful for producing broken inputs for various
test cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63771
llvm-svn: 364517
While lowering calls, collect info about registers that forward arguments
into following function frame. We store such info into the MachineFunction
of the call. This is used very late when dumping DWARF info about
call site parameters.
([9/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60715
llvm-svn: 364516
Remove the last use of packRegs from IRTranslator and delete
pack/unpackRegs. This introduces a fallback to DAGISel for intrinsics
with aggregate arguments, since we don't have a testcase for them so
it's hard to tell how we'd want to handle them.
Discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63551
llvm-svn: 364514
Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerCall to accept several
virtual registers for each argument, instead of just one. This is a
follow-up to D46018.
CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660 and
lowerFormalArguments in D63549.
With this change, we no longer pack the virtual registers generated for
aggregates into one big lump before delegating to the target. Therefore,
the target can decide itself whether it wants to handle them as separate
pieces or use one big register.
ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers
directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many
merge/extract instructions.
NFCI for AMDGPU, Mips and X86.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63551
llvm-svn: 364512
Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerCall to accept several
virtual registers for the call result, instead of just one. This is a
follow-up to D46018.
CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660 and
lowerFormalArguments in D63549.
With this change, we no longer pack the virtual registers generated for
aggregates into one big lump before delegating to the target. Therefore,
the target can decide itself whether it wants to handle them as separate
pieces or use one big register.
ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers
directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many
merge/extract instructions.
NFCI for AMDGPU, Mips and X86.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63550
llvm-svn: 364511
Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerFormalArguments to accept
several virtual registers for each formal argument, instead of just one.
This is a follow-up to D46018.
CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660. lowerCall
will be refactored in the same way in follow-up patches.
With this change, we forward the virtual registers generated for
aggregates to CallLowering. Therefore, the target can decide itself
whether it wants to handle them as separate pieces or use one big
register. We also copy the pack/unpackRegs helpers to CallLowering to
facilitate this.
ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers
directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many
merge/extract instructions.
AArch64 seems to have had a bug when lowering e.g. [1 x i8*], which was
put into a s64 instead of a p0. Added a test-case which illustrates the
problem more clearly (it crashes without this patch) and fixed the
existing test-case to expect p0.
AMDGPU has been updated to unpack into the virtual registers for
kernels. I think the other code paths fall back for aggregates, so this
should be NFC.
Mips doesn't support aggregates yet, so it's also NFC.
x86 seems to have code for dealing with aggregates, but I couldn't find
the tests for it, so I just added a fallback to DAGISel if we get more
than one virtual register for an argument.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63549
llvm-svn: 364510
Allow CallLowering::ArgInfo to contain more than one virtual register.
This is useful when passes split aggregates into several virtual
registers, but need to also provide information about the original type
to the call lowering. Used in follow-up patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63548
llvm-svn: 364509
Add an attribute into the MachineFunction that tracks call site info.
([8/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61061
llvm-svn: 364506
It was failing with:
In file included from /b/s/w/ir/cache/builder/src/third_party/llvm/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitstreamReader.cpp:9:0:
/b/s/w/ir/cache/builder/src/third_party/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Bitcode/BitstreamReader.h:
In member function 'llvm::Expected<long unsigned int> llvm::SimpleBitstreamCursor::ReadVBR64(unsigned int)':
/b/s/w/ir/cache/builder/src/third_party/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Bitcode/BitstreamReader.h:262:14:
error: could not convert 'MaybeRead' from 'llvm::Expected<unsigned int>' to 'llvm::Expected<long unsigned int>'
return MaybeRead;
^
/b/s/w/ir/cache/builder/src/third_party/llvm/llvm/include/llvm/Bitcode/BitstreamReader.h:279:16:
error: could not convert 'MaybeRead' from 'llvm::Expected<unsigned int>' to 'llvm::Expected<long unsigned int>'
return MaybeRead;
^
llvm-svn: 364504
The bitstream reader handles errors poorly. This has two effects:
* Bugs in file handling (especially modules) manifest as an "unexpected end of
file" crash
* Users of clang as a library end up aborting because the code unconditionally
calls `report_fatal_error`
The bitstream reader should be more resilient and return Expected / Error as
soon as an error is encountered, not way late like it does now. This patch
starts doing so and adopting the error handling where I think it makes sense.
There's plenty more to do: this patch propagates errors to be minimally useful,
and follow-ups will propagate them further and improve diagnostics.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42311
<rdar://problem/33159405>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63518
llvm-svn: 364464
This implements a small enhancement to https://reviews.llvm.org/D55506
Specifically, while we were able to match strict FP nodes for
floating-point extend operations with a register as source, this
did not work for operations with memory as source.
That is because from regular operations, this is represented as
a combined "extload" node (which is a variant of a load SD node);
but there is no equivalent using a strict FP operation.
However, it turns out that even in the absence of an extload
node, we can still just match the operations explicitly, e.g.
(strict_fpextend (f32 (load node:$ptr))
This patch implements that method to match the LDEB/LXEB/LXDB
SystemZ instructions even when the extend uses a strict-FP node.
llvm-svn: 364450
The full GSYM patch started with: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53379
In that patch we wanted to split up getting GSYM into the LLVM code base so we are not committing too much code at once.
This is a first in a series of patches where I only add the foundation classes along with complete unit tests. They provide the foundation for encoding and decoding a GSYM file.
File entries are defined in llvm::gsym::FileEntry. This class splits the file up into a directory and filename represented by uniqued string table offsets. This allows all files that are referred to in a GSYM file to be encoded as 1 based indexes into a global file table in the GSYM file.
Function information in stored in llvm::gsym::FunctionInfo. This object represents a contiguous address range that has a name and range with an optional line table and inline call stack information.
Line table entries are defined in llvm::gsym::LineEntry. They store only address, file and line information to keep the line tables simple and allows the information to be efficiently encoded in a subsequent patch.
Inline information is defined in llvm::gsym::InlineInfo. These structs store the name of the inline function, along with one or more address ranges, and the file and line that called this function. They also contain any child inline information.
There are also utility classes for address ranges in llvm::gsym::AddressRange, and string table support in llvm::gsym::StringTable which are simple classes.
The unit tests test all the APIs on these simple classes so they will be ready for the next patches where we will create GSYM files and parse GSYM files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63104
llvm-svn: 364427
Summary:
(Not so) boringly identical to pattern a (D62786)
Not yet sure how do deal with the last pattern c.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62793
llvm-svn: 364418
This allows later passes (in particular InstCombine) to optimize more
cases.
One that's important to us is `memcmp(p, q, constant) < 0` and memcmp(p, q, constant) > 0.
llvm-svn: 364412
Introduce the debug info flag that indicates that a parameter has unchanged
value throughout a function. This info will be used to emit the expressions
with DW_OP_entry_value.
([4/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58034
llvm-svn: 364406
As discussed on RFC
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130094.html), this
is set of patches that introduces debug information about call site and
call site parameters. Since the LLVM has portion of this support (dumping
DWARF 5 symbols for calls), we generate GNU extensions as well. All of that
will be restricted under an option.
([1/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60712
llvm-svn: 364385
Summary:
The list of relocations with addend in lld was missing `R_WASM_MEMORY_ADDR_REL_SLEB`,
causing `wasm-ld` to generate corrupted output. This fixes that problem and while
we're at it pulls the list of such relocations into the Wasm.h header, to avoid
duplicating it in multiple places.
Reviewers: sbc100
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63696
llvm-svn: 364367
Peephole opt has a one use limitation which appears to be accidental. The function being used was incorrectly documented as returning whether the def had one *user*, but instead returned true only when there was one *use*. Add a corresponding hasOneNonDbgUser helper, and adjust peephole-opt to use the appropriate one.
All of the actual folding code handles multiple uses within a single instruction. That codepath is well exercised through instruction selection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63656
llvm-svn: 364336
