Projects that set LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD to an empty list
can't use add_llvm_tool (and probably other macros).
Here's the error that this change fixes:
list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70167
Signed-off-by: Kevin Petit <kevin.petit@arm.com>
This is a resubmission of bbb29738b58aaf6f6518269abdcf8f64131665a9 that
was reverted due to clang tests failures. It includes the fix and
additional IR tests for the missed case.
Summary:
In case when all incoming values of a PHI are equal pointers, this
transformation inserts a definition of such a pointer right after
definition of the base pointer and replaces with this value both PHI and
all it's incoming pointers. Primary goal of this transformation is
canonicalization of this pattern in order to enable optimizations that
can't handle PHIs. Non-inbounds pointers aren't currently supported.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, apilipenko
Reviewed By: apilipenko
Tags: #llvm
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68128
This patch adds an assertion check for exported read/write-only
variables to be also in import list for module. If they aren't
we may face linker errors, because read/write-only variables are
internalized in their source modules. The patch also changes
export lists to store ValueInfo instead of GUID for performance
considerations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70128
Summary:
This removes the use of zero as a base address in section-based dumping.
Although this will often be true for (unlinked) object files with a
single compile unit, it is not true in general. This means that
section-based dumping will not be able to resolve entries referencing
the base address (DW_LLE_offset_pair) -- it wasn't able to do that
correctly before either, but now it will be more explicit about it. One
exception to that is if the location list contains an explicit
DW_LLE_base_address entry -- in this case the dumper will pick it up,
and resolve subsequent entries normally.
The patch also removes the fallback to zero in the "inline" dumping in
case the compile unit does not contain a base address.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, JDevlieghere, aprantl, SouraVX
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70115
Summary:
This fixes PR43081, where the transformation of `strchr(p, 0) -> p +
strlen(p)` can cause a segfault, if `-fno-builtin-strlen` is used. In
that case, `emitStrLen` returns nullptr, which CreateGEP is not designed
to handle. Also add the minimized code from the PR as a test case.
Reviewers: xbolva00, spatel, jdoerfert, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70143
Summary:
After D70211, Pass.h does not include InitializePasses.h anymore, so
these files need to include InitializePasses.h directly.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: MatzeB, mehdi_amini, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70217
Avoids the need to include TargetMachine.h from various places just for
an enum. Various other enums live here, such as the optimization level,
TLS model, etc. Data suggests that this change probably doesn't matter,
but it seems nice to have anyway.
Summary:
This makes it look like an elseif and also the variable referenced
in the condition was removed from this function in r366622.
Reviewers: dsanders, beanz, smeenai, compnerd, phosek
Reviewed By: beanz
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70159
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
This method is private and only called from this file and doesn't need
to be inline. Saves a TargetMachine.h include in MachineFunction.h, a
popular header. The include was introduced in 98603a8153086 despite the
forward decl of LLVMTargetMachine.
The Promote action doesn't apply until LegalizeDAG. By the time
we get there, we would have already softened all the FP operations
if useSoftFloat was true. So there wouldn't be any operation left
to Promote.
Summary:
This temporarily disables the large working set size behavior in profile guided
size optimization due to internal benchmark regressions.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70207
The bug manifests as replacing a reduction operand with an undef
value.
The problem appears to be limited to cases where a min/max reduction
has extra uses of the compare operand to the select.
In the general case, we are tracking "ExternallyUsedValues" and
an "IgnoreList" of the reduction operations, but those may not apply
to the final compare+select in a min/max reduction.
For that, we use replaceAllUsesWith (RAUW) to ensure that the new
vectorized reduction values are transferred to all subsequent users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70148
Summary:
The option allows to disable specific target library builtin functions,
instead of -disable-simplify-libcalls, which disables all of them.
This is a prerequisite for D70143, which fixes PR43081.
Reviewers: xbolva00, spatel, jdoerfert, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70193
v256i1 on X86 without avx512 breaks down to 256 i8 values when passed between basic blocks. But the NumRegistersForVT was sized at a byte for each VT. This results in 256 being stored as 0.
This patch enlarges the type to 16 bits and adds an assert to ensure that no information is lost when the entry is stored.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70138
During register coalescing, we update the live-intervals on-the-fly.
To do that we are in this strange mode where the live-intervals can
be slightly out-of-sync (more precisely they are forward looking)
compared to what the IR actually represents.
This happens because the register coalescer only updates the IR when
it is done with updating the live-intervals and it has to do it this
way because updating the IR on-the-fly would actually clobber some
information on how the live-ranges that are being updated look like.
This is problematic for updates that rely on the IR to accurately
represents the state of the live-ranges. Right now, we have only
one of those: stripValuesNotDefiningMask.
To reconcile this need of out-of-sync IR, this patch introduces a
new argument to LiveInterval::refineSubRanges that allows the code
doing the live range updates to reason about how the code should
look like after the coalescer will have rewritten the registers.
Essentially this captures how a subregister index with be offseted
to match its position in a new register class.
E.g., let say we want to merge:
V1.sub1:<2 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>
We do that by choosing a class where sub1:<2 x s32> and sub3:<4 x s32>
overlap, i.e., by choosing a class where we can find "offset + 1 == 3".
Put differently we align V2's sub3 with V1's sub1:
V2: sub0 sub1 sub2 sub3
V1: <offset> sub0 sub1
This offset will look like a composed subregidx in the the class:
V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>
=> V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>
Now if we didn't rewrite the uses and def of V1, all the checks for V1
need to account for this offset to match what the live intervals intend
to capture.
Prior to this patch, we would fail to recognize the uses and def of V1
and would end up with machine verifier errors: No live segment at def.
This could lead to miscompile as we would drop some live-ranges and
thus, miss some interferences.
For this problem to trigger, we need to reach stripValuesNotDefiningMask
while having a mismatch between the IR and the live-ranges (i.e.,
we have to apply a subreg offset to the IR.)
This requires the following three conditions:
1. An update of overlapping subreg lanes: e.g., dsub0 == <ssub0, ssub1>
2. An update with Tuple registers with a possibility to coalesce the
subreg index: e.g., v1.dsub_1 == v2.dsub_3
3. Subreg liveness enabled.
looking at the IR to decide what is alive and what is not, i.e., calling
stripValuesNotDefiningMask.
coalescer maintains for the live-ranges information.
None of the targets that currently use subreg liveness (i.e., the targets
that fulfill #3, Hexagon, AMDGPU, PowerPC, and SystemZ IIRC) expose #1 and
and #2, so this patch also artificial enables subreg liveness for ARM,
so that a nice test case can be attached.
RETA always implicitly uses LR, unlike RET which merely has an
alias that defaults it to LR.
Additionally, RETA implicitly uses SP as well, which it uses as
a discriminator to authenticate LR.
This isn't usually noticeable, because RET_ReallyLR is used in most
of the backend. However, the post-RA scheduler, if enabled, will
cause miscompiles if the imp-uses are missing.
While there, fix a typo in the lone affected testcase.
The instruction definition has been retroactively expanded to
allow for an alias for '[xN, 0]!' as '[xN]!'.
That wouldn't make sense on LDR, but does for LDRA.
Summary:
when building plugins, as AIX has symbols in it's standard library that
must be garbage collected or we will see link errors. Export lists will
handle this instead on AIX.
Reviewers: stevewan, sfertile, jasonliu, xingxue, DiggerLin
Reviewed By: DiggerLin
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70130
As noted by the FIXME comment, this is not correct based on our current FMF semantics.
We should be propagating FMF from the final value in a sequence (in this case the
'select'). So the behavior even without this patch is wrong, but we did not allow FMF
on 'select' until recently.
But if we do the correct thing right now in this patch, we'll inevitably introduce
regressions because we have not wired up FMF propagation for 'phi' and 'select' in
other passes (like SimplifyCFG) or other places in InstCombine. I'm not seeing a
better incremental way to make progress.
That said, the potential extra damage over the existing wrong behavior from this
patch is very limited. AFAIK, the only way to have different FMF on IR in the same
function is if we have LTO inlined IR from 2 modules that were compiled using
different fast-math settings.
As seen in the tests, we may actually see some improvements with this patch because
adding the FMF to the 'select' allows matching to min/max intrinsics that were
previously missed (in the common case, the 'fcmp' and 'select' should have identical
FMF to begin with).
Next steps in the transition:
Make similar changes in instcombine as needed.
Enable phi-to-select FMF propagation in SimplifyCFG.
Remove dependencies on fcmp with FMF.
Deprecate FMF on fcmp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69720
Summary:
This avoid the need to duplicate the location lists searching logic in
various users. The "inline location list dumping" code (which is the
only user actually updated to handle DWARF v5 location lists) is
switched to this method. After adding v4 location list support, I'll
switch other users too.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, JDevlieghere, aprantl, SouraVX
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70084
