Stop concatenating std::string before streaming into a raw_ostream.
Just stream the pieces.
Remove some new lines from asserts. Remove std::string concatenation
from an assert. assert strings aren't really evaluated like this at
runtime. An assertion failure will just print exactly what's between
the parentheses in the source.
Fix PR48742: the D75203 assembler optimization locates MCRelaxableFragment's
within two MCSymbol's and relaxes some MCRelaxableFragment's to reduce the size
of a MCAlignFragment. A -g build has more MCSymbol's and therefore may have
different assembler output (e.g. a MCRelaxableFragment (jmp) may have 5 bytes
with -O1 while 2 bytes with -O1 -g).
`.p2align 4, 0x90` is common due to loops. For a larger program, with a
lot of temporary labels, the assembly output difference is somewhat
destined. The cost seems to overweigh the benefits so we default to
-x86-pad-for-align=false until the heuristic is improved.
Reviewed By: skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94542
InstCombine already performs a fold where X == Y ? f(X) : Z is
transformed to X == Y ? f(Y) : Z if f(Y) simplifies. However,
if f(X) only has one use, then we can always directly replace the
use inside the instruction. To actually be profitable, limit it to
the case where Y is a non-expr constant.
This could be further extended to replace uses further up a one-use
instruction chain, but for now this only looks one level up.
Among other things, this also subsumes D94860.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94862
When removing catchpad's from catchswitch, if that removes a successor,
we need to record that in DomTreeUpdater.
This fixes PostDomTree preservation failure in an existing test.
This appears to be the single issue that i see in my current test coverage.
If the previous block in a function does not fallthough, adding nop's to
align it will never be executed. This means we can freely (except for
codesize) align more branches. This happens in constantislandspass (as
it cannot happen later) and only happens at aggressive optimization
levels as it does increase codesize.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94394
This is NFC-intended and another step towards supporting
intrinsics as reduction candidates.
The remaining bits of the OperationData class do not make
much sense as-is, so I will try to improve that, but I'm
trying to take minimal steps because it's still not clear
how this was intended to work.
This is another NFC-intended patch to allow matching
intrinsics (example: maxnum) as candidates for reductions.
It's possible that the loop/if logic can be reduced now,
but it's still difficult to understand how this all works.
This treats low overhead loop branches the same as jump tables and
indirect branches in analyzeBranch - they cannot be analyzed but the
direct branches on the end of the block may be removed. This helps
remove the unnecessary branches earlier, which can help produce better
codegen (and change block layout in a number of cases).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94392
We now have a lot of llc tests for hardware loops in CodeGen, which test
a larger variety of loops and are easier to maintain. This removes the
llc from mixed llc/opt tests.
This patch removes some ancient options as a clean-up before moving
code-gen to use LTOBackend in D94487.
I think it would preferable to remove those ancient options, because
1. There are no corresponding options in LTOBackend based tools,
2. There are no unit tests for them,
3. They are not passed through by Clang,
4. At least for GNVLoadPRE, users could just use GVN's `enable-load-pre`.
Alternatively we could add support for those options to lto::Config &
co, but I think it would be better to remove them, unless they are
actually used in practice.
Reviewed By: steven_wu, tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94783
According to "9. Vector Memory Alignment Constraints" in V
specification, the alignment of vector memory access is aligned to the
size of the element. In our current implementation, we support ELEN up
to 64. We could assume the alignment of vector registers is 64 under the
assumption.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94751
Current code breaks this version of MSVC due to a mismatch between `std::is_trivially_copyable` and `llvm::is_trivially_copyable` for `std::pair` instantiations. Hence I was attempting to use `std::is_trivially_copyable` to set `llvm::is_trivially_copyable<T>::value`.
I spent some time root causing an `llvm::Optional` build error on MSVC 16.8.3 related to the change described above:
```
62>C:\src\ocg_llvm\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm/ADT/BreadthFirstIterator.h(96,12): error C2280: 'llvm::Optional<std::pair<std::pair<unsigned int,llvm::Graph<4>::NodeSubset> *,llvm::Optional<llvm::Graph<4>::ChildIterator>>> &llvm::Optional<std::pair<std::pair<unsigned int,llvm::Graph<4>::NodeSubset> *,llvm::Optional<llvm::Graph<4>::ChildIterator>>>::operator =(const llvm::Optional<std::pair<std::pair<unsigned int,llvm::Graph<4>::NodeSubset> *,llvm::Optional<llvm::Graph<4>::ChildIterator>>> &)': attempting to reference a deleted function (compiling source file C:\src\ocg_llvm\llvm-project\llvm\unittests\ADT\BreadthFirstIteratorTest.cpp)
...
```
The "trivial" specialization of `optional_detail::OptionalStorage` assumes that the value type is trivially copy constructible and trivially copy assignable. The specialization is invoked based on a check of `is_trivially_copyable` alone, which does not imply both `is_trivially_copy_assignable` and `is_trivially_copy_constructible` are true.
[[ https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/named_req/TriviallyCopyable | According to the spec ]], a deleted assignment operator does not make `is_trivially_copyable` false. So I think all these properties need to be checked explicitly in order to specialize `OptionalStorage` to the "trivial" version:
```
/// Storage for any type.
template <typename T, bool = std::is_trivially_copy_constructible<T>::value
&& std::is_trivially_copy_assignable<T>::value>
class OptionalStorage {
```
Above fixed my build break in MSVC, but I think we need to explicitly check `is_trivially_copy_constructible` too since it might be possible the copy constructor is deleted. Also would be ideal to move over to `std::is_trivially_copyable` instead of the `llvm` namespace verson.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93510
This is a follow-up fix to commit 03c8d6a0c4bd0016bdfd1e5.
Seems like we now end up with NeedInvert being set in the result
from LegalizeSetCCCondCode more often than in the past, so we
need to handle NeedInvert when expanding BR_CC.
Not sure how to deal with the "Tmp4.getNode()" case properly,
but current assumption is that that code path isn't impacted
by the changes in 03c8d6a0c4bd0016bdfd1e5 so we can simply move
the old assert into the if-branch and only handle NeedInvert in the
else-branch.
I think that the test case added here, for PowerPC, might have
failed also before commit 03c8d6a0c4bd0016bdfd1e5. But we started
to hit the assert more often downstream when having merged that
commit.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94762
The ``llvm.experimental.noalias.scope.decl`` intrinsic identifies where a noalias
scope is declared. When the intrinsic is duplicated, a decision must
also be made about the scope: depending on the reason of the duplication,
the scope might need to be duplicated as well.
Reviewed By: nikic, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93039
inline
The stats are printed at InlinePass destruction. When we have 2 of them,
it appears the destruction order of the Passes std::vector of the pass
manager differs in msan builds - example:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/2135.
This reproes locally, too.
Temporarily removing the sub-test case, to green the build, and will
follow up with a stat dumping alternative that does not depend on vector
element dtor order.
Expanding from D94808 - we ensure the same InlineAdvisor is used by both
InlinerPass instances. The notion of mandatory inlining is moved into
the core InlineAdvisor: advisors anyway have to handle that case, so
this change also factors out that a bit better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94825
Unary minus operator applied to unsigned type, result still unsigned.
Use `~0U` instead of `-1U` and `1 + ~VAL` instead of `-VAL`.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94417
This reverts commit 33be50daa9ce1074c3b423a4ab27c70c0722113a,
effectively reapplying:
- 260a856c2abcef49c7cb3bdcd999701db3e2af38
- 3043e5a5c33c4c871f4a1dfd621a8839f9a1f0b3
- 49142991a685bd427d7e877c29c77371dfb7634c
... with a fix to skip a call to `SmallVector::isReferenceToStorage()`
when we know the parameter had been taken by value for small, POD-like
`T`. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D93779 for the discussion on the
revert.
At a high-level, these commits fix reference invalidation in
SmallVector's push_back, append, insert (one or N), and resize
operations. For more details, please see the original commit messages.
This commit fixes a bug that crept into
`SmallVectorTemplateCommon::reserveForAndGetAddress()` during the review
process after performance analysis was done. That function is now called
`reserveForParamAndGetAddress()`, clarifying that it only works for
parameter values. It uses that knowledge to bypass
`SmallVector::isReferenceToStorage()` when `TakesParamByValue`. This is
`constexpr` and avoids adding overhead for "small enough", trivially
copyable `T`.
Performance could potentially be tuned further by increasing the
threshold for `TakesParamByValue`, which is currently defined as:
```
bool TakesParamByValue = sizeof(T) <= 2 * sizeof(void *);
```
in the POD-like version of SmallVectorTemplateBase (else, `false`).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94800
To get into this block we had: !A || B || C
and we checked C in the first 'if' clause
leaving !A || B. But the 2nd 'if' is checking:
A && !B --> !(!A || B)
DestBB might or might not already be a successor of SelectBB,
and it wasn't we need to ensure that we record the fact in DomTree.
The testcase used to crash in lazy domtree updater mode + non-per-function
domtree validity checks disabled.
This is not nice, but it's the best transient solution possible,
and is better than just duplicating the whole function.
The problem is, this function is widely used,
and it is not at all obvious that all the users
could be painlessly switched to operate on DomTreeUpdater,
and somehow i don't feel like porting all those users first.
This function is one of last three that not operate on DomTreeUpdater.
This is not nice, but it's the best transient solution possible,
and is better than just duplicating the whole function.
The problem is, this function is widely used,
and it is not at all obvious that all the users
could be painlessly switched to operate on DomTreeUpdater,
and somehow i don't feel like porting all those users first.
This function is one of last three that not operate on DomTreeUpdater.
This is not nice, but it's the best transient solution possible,
and is better than just duplicating the whole function.
The problem is, this function is widely used,
and it is not at all obvious that all the users
could be painlessly switched to operate on DomTreeUpdater,
and somehow i don't feel like porting all those users first.
This function is one of last three that not operate on DomTreeUpdater.
Even though not all it's users operate on DomTreeUpdater,
it itself internally operates on DomTreeUpdater,
so it must mean everything is fine with that,
so just do that globally.
This reverts commit a3904cc77f181cff7355357688edfc392a236f5d.
It causes the compiler to crash while building Harfbuzz for ARM in
Chromium, reduced reproducer forthcoming:
https://crbug.com/1167305
