The sancov runtime for the (Fuchsia) Zircon kernel delivers results
in the standard format, but as the full array of possible samples
with 0 in uncovered slots. That runtime delivers "live" data and
has no final "export" pass to compactify out the uncovered slots,
and it seems silly to require another offline tool just for that.
Patch By: mcgrathr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63695
llvm-svn: 365839
This patch contains a port of SanitizerCoverage to the new pass manager. This one's a bit hefty.
Changes:
- Split SanitizerCoverageModule into 2 SanitizerCoverage for passing over
functions and ModuleSanitizerCoverage for passing over modules.
- ModuleSanitizerCoverage exists for adding 2 module level calls to initialization
functions but only if there's a function that was instrumented by sancov.
- Added legacy and new PM wrapper classes that own instances of the 2 new classes.
- Update llvm tests and add clang tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62888
llvm-svn: 365838
Original patch from alanbaker@google.com
Fixes the error:
CMake Error in <...>/llvm/cmake/modules/CMakeLists.txt:
export called with target "LLVMTestingSupport" which requires target
"gtest" that is not in the export set.
This occurs when LLVM is embedded in a larger project, but is configured not to
include tests. If testing is disabled gtest isn't available and LLVM fails to
configure.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63097
llvm-svn: 365836
Introduce and deduce "nosync" function attribute to indicate that a function
does not synchronize with another thread in a way that other thread might free memory.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, jfb, nhaehnle, arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, hfinkel, nhaenhle, mehdi_amini, steven_wu,
dexonsmith, arsenm, uenoku, hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62766
llvm-svn: 365830
Summary:
Recently I ran into the following issue:
./update_test_checks.py /path/not-existing-file.ll
The script was silent and I was suprised why the real test file hadn't been updated.
Solution:
Emit warning if we detect this problem.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, spatel, jdoerfert, nikic
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, spatel, jdoerfert, nikic
Subscribers: jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64572
llvm-svn: 365818
Follow up to D58597, where it was noted that the commuted ISD::SUB variant
was having problems with lack of combines.
See also D63958 where we untangled setcc/sub pairs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58875
llvm-svn: 365791
We already split extract_subvector(binop(insert_subvector(v,x),insert_subvector(w,y))) -> binop(x,y).
This patch adds support for extract_subvector(binop(concat_vectors(),concat_vectors())) cases as well.
In particular this means we don't have to wait for X86 lowering to convert concat_vectors to insert_subvector chains, which helps avoid some cases where demandedelts/combine calls occur too late to split large vector ops.
The fast-isel-store.ll load folding regression is annoying but I don't think is that critical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63653
llvm-svn: 365785
This patch improves the error messages reported for
note sections and phdrs and also makes a cleanup for
existent test case.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64470
llvm-svn: 365775
The interface predates CallBase, so both it and implementation were
significantly more complicated than they needed to be. There was even
some redundancy that could be eliminated.
Should also help with OpaquePointers by not trying to derive a
function's type from it's PointerType.
llvm-svn: 365767
There is no way to set broken sh_size field currently
for sections. It can be usefull for writing the
test cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64401
llvm-svn: 365766
It does not make sence to stop dumping the object if the broken
dynamic section was found. In this patch I changed the behavior from
"report an error" to "report a warning". This matches GNU.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64472
llvm-svn: 365762
This reverts r365750 (git commit 8b222ecf2769ee133691f208f6166ce118c4a164)
llvm-dis runs out of memory while opening invalid-fcmp-opnum.bc on
llvm-hexagon-elf, probably because the bitcode file contains other
suspicious values.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-hexagon-elf/builds/21949
llvm-svn: 365757
There is currently an EPERM error when a regular user executes `llvm-objcopy a.o /dev/null`.
Worse, root can even change the mode bits of /dev/null.
Fix it by checking if the output file is special.
A new overload of llvm::sys::fs::setPermissions with FD as the parameter
is added. Users should provide `perm & ~umask` as the parameter if they
intend to respect umask.
The existing overload of llvm::sys::fs::setPermissions may be deleted if
we can find an implementation of fchmod() on Windows. fchmod() is
usually better than chmod() because it saves syscalls and can avoid race
condition.
Reviewed By: jakehehrlich, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64236
llvm-svn: 365753
Summary:
As of binutils 2.32, ld has a bogus TLS relaxation error when the GD/LD
code sequence using R_X86_64_GOTPCREL (instead of R_X86_64_GOTPCRELX) is
attempted to be relaxed to IE/LE (binutils PR24784). gold and lld are good.
In gcc/config/i386/i386.md, there is a configure-time check of as/ld
support and the GOT relaxation will not be used if as/ld doesn't support
it:
if (flag_plt || !HAVE_AS_IX86_TLS_GET_ADDR_GOT)
return "call\t%P2";
return "call\t{*%p2@GOT(%1)|[DWORD PTR %p2@GOT[%1]]}";
In clang, -DENABLE_X86_RELAX_RELOCATIONS=OFF is the default. The ld.bfd
bogus error can be reproduced with:
thread_local int a;
int main() { return a; }
clang -fno-plt -fpic a.cc -fuse-ld=bfd
GOTPCRELX gained relative good support in 2016, which is considered
relatively new. It is even difficult to conditionally default to
-DENABLE_X86_RELAX_RELOCATIONS=ON due to cross compilation reasons. So
work around the ld.bfd bug by only using GOT when GOTPCRELX is enabled.
Reviewers: dalias, hjl.tools, nikic, rnk
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64304
llvm-svn: 365752
Currently invalid bitcode files can cause a crash, when OpNum exceeds
the number of elements in Record, like in the attached bitcode file.
The test case was generated by clusterfuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=15698
Reviewers: t.p.northover, thegameg, jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64507
llvm-svn: 365750
This patch addresses a couple of problems:
1) The maximum supported offset of LE is -4094.
2) The offset of WLS also needs to be checked, this uses a
maximum positive offset of 4094.
The use of BasicBlockUtils has been changed because the block offsets
weren't being initialised, but the isBBInRange checks both positive
and negative offsets.
ARMISelLowering has been tweaked because the test case presented
another pattern that we weren't supporting.
llvm-svn: 365749
The VQDMLAH.U8, VQDMLAH.U16 and VQDMLAH.U32 instructions don't
actually exist: the Armv8.1-M architecture spec only lists signed
forms of that instruction. The unsigned ones were added in error: they
existed in an early draft of the spec, but they were removed before
the public version, and we missed that particular spec change.
Also affects the variant forms VQDMLASH, VQRDMLAH and VQRDMLASH.
Reviewers: miyuki
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64502
llvm-svn: 365747
Skip copies between virtual registers during search for UseDefs
and DefUses.
Since each operand has one def search for UseDefs is straightforward.
But since operand can have many uses, we have to check all uses of
each copy we traverse during search for DefUses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64486
llvm-svn: 365744
When one of the uses/defs of ambiguous instruction is also ambiguous
visit it recursively and search its uses/defs for instruction with
only one mapping available.
When all instruction in a chain are ambiguous arbitrary mapping can
be selected. For s64 operands in ambiguous chain fprb is selected since
it results in less instructions then having to narrow scalar s64 to s32.
For s32 both gprb and fprb result in same number of instructions and
gprb is selected like a general purpose option.
At the moment we always avoid cross register bank copies.
TODO: Implement a model for costs calculations of different mappings
on same instruction and cross bank copies. Allow cross bank copies
when appropriate according to cost model.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64485
llvm-svn: 365743
