scale factors in memory addresses. As it does for .att_syntax.
It was producing:
Assertion failed: (((Scale == 1 || Scale == 2 || Scale == 4 || Scale == 8)) && "Invalid scale!"), function CreateMem, file /Volumes/SandBox/llvm/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp, line 1133.
rdar://14967214
llvm-svn: 199942
Originally, BLX was passed as operand #0 in MachineInstr and as operand
#2 in MCInst. But now, it's operand #2 in both cases.
This patch also removes unnecessary FileCheck in the test case added by r199127.
llvm-svn: 199928
This pattern uses an SDNodeXForm, which isn't being emitted for some
reason. I can get it to work by attaching the PatLeaf that has the
XForm to the argument in the output pattern, but this results in an
immediate being used in a register operand, which the backend can't
handle yet.
llvm-svn: 199918
The control flow finalizer would sometimes use an ALU_POP_AFTER
instruction before the vetex fetch clause instead of using a POP
instruction after it.
llvm-svn: 199917
Implement the getUnrollingPreferences() function for
AMDGPUTargetTransformInfo so that loops that do address calculations
on pointers derived from alloca are unconditionally unrolled.
Unrolling these loops makes it more likely that SROA will be able to
eliminate the allocas, which is a big win for R600 since memory
allocated by alloca (private memory) is really slow.
llvm-svn: 199916
Argument promotion can replace an argument of a call with an alloca. This
requires clearing the tail marker as it is very likely that the callee is now
using an alloca in the caller.
This fixes pr14710.
llvm-svn: 199909
The unit test is now disabled on non-asserts builds.
The CF stack can be corrupted if you use CF_ALU_PUSH_BEFORE,
CF_ALU_ELSE_AFTER, CF_ALU_BREAK, or CF_ALU_CONTINUE when the number of
sub-entries on the stack is greater than or equal to the stack entry
size and sub-entries modulo 4 is either 0 or 3 (on cedar the bug is
present when number of sub-entries module 8 is either 7 or 0)
We choose to be conservative and always apply the work-around when the
number of sub-enries is greater than or equal to the stack entry size,
so that we can safely over-allocate the stack when we are unsure of the
stack allocation rules.
reviewed-by: Vincent Lejeune <vljn at ovi.com>
llvm-svn: 199905
With constant-sharing, litpool loads consume 4 + N*2 bytes of code, but
movw/movt pairs consume 8*N. This means litpools are better than movw/movt even
with just one use. Other materialisation strategies can still be better though,
so the logic is a little odd.
llvm-svn: 199891
function and a FunctionPass.
This has many benefits. The motivating use case was to be able to
compute function analysis passes *after* running LoopSimplify (to avoid
invalidating them) and then to run other passes which require
LoopSimplify. Specifically passes like unrolling and vectorization are
critical to wire up to BranchProbabilityInfo and BlockFrequencyInfo so
that they can be profile aware. For the LoopVectorize pass the only
things in the way are LoopSimplify and LCSSA. This fixes LoopSimplify
and LCSSA is next on my list.
There are also a bunch of other benefits of doing this:
- It is now very feasible to make more passes *preserve* LoopSimplify
because they can simply run it after changing a loop. Because
subsequence passes can assume LoopSimplify is preserved we can reduce
the runs of this pass to the times when we actually mutate a loop
structure.
- The new pass manager should be able to more easily support loop passes
factored in this way.
- We can at long, long last observe that LoopSimplify is preserved
across SCEV. This *halves* the number of times we run LoopSimplify!!!
Now, getting here wasn't trivial. First off, the interfaces used by
LoopSimplify are all over the map regarding how analysis are updated. We
end up with weird "pass" parameters as a consequence. I'll try to clean
at least some of this up later -- I'll have to have it all clean for the
new pass manager.
Next up I discovered a really frustrating bug. LoopUnroll *claims* to
preserve LoopSimplify. That's actually a lie. But the way the
LoopPassManager ends up running the passes, it always ran LoopSimplify
on the unrolled-into loop, rectifying this oversight before any
verification could kick in and point out that in fact nothing was
preserved. So I've added code to the unroller to *actually* simplify the
surrounding loop when it succeeds at unrolling.
The only functional change in the test suite is that we now catch a case
that was previously missed because SCEV and other loop transforms see
their containing loops as simplified and thus don't miss some
opportunities. One test case has been converted to check that we catch
this case rather than checking that we miss it but at least don't get
the wrong answer.
Note that I have #if-ed out all of the verification logic in
LoopSimplify! This is a temporary workaround while extracting these bits
from the LoopPassManager. Currently, there is no way to have a pass in
the LoopPassManager which preserves LoopSimplify along with one which
does not. The LPM will try to verify on each loop in the nest that
LoopSimplify holds but the now-Function-pass cannot distinguish what
loop is being verified and so must try to verify all of them. The inner
most loop is clearly no longer simplified as there is a pass which
didn't even *attempt* to preserve it. =/ Once I get LCSSA out (and maybe
LoopVectorize and some other fixes) I'll be able to re-enable this check
and catch any places where we are still failing to preserve
LoopSimplify. If this causes problems I can back this out and try to
commit *all* of this at once, but so far this seems to work and allow
much more incremental progress.
llvm-svn: 199884
This patch updates .set mips16 support which
affects the ELF ABI and its flags. In addition the patch uses
a common interface for both the MipsTargetSteamer and
MipsObjectStreamer that the assembler uses for
both ELF and ASCII output for these directives.
llvm-svn: 199851
This is a horrible bit of code. We're calling a simplification routine *in the middle* of type legalization. We tell the
simplification routine that it's running after legalization, but some of the types it will encounter will be illegal! The
fix is only to invoke the simplification if the types in question were legal, so that none of its invariants will be violated.
llvm-svn: 199847
This reverts commit 35b8331cad6eb512a2506adbc394201181da94ba.
The -debug-only flag for llc doesn't appear to be available in
all build configurations.
llvm-svn: 199845
The CF stack can be corrupted if you use CF_ALU_PUSH_BEFORE,
CF_ALU_ELSE_AFTER, CF_ALU_BREAK, or CF_ALU_CONTINUE when the number of
sub-entries on the stack is greater than or equal to the stack entry
size and sub-entries modulo 4 is either 0 or 3 (on cedar the bug is
present when number of sub-entries module 8 is either 7 or 0)
We choose to be conservative and always apply the work-around when the
number of sub-enries is greater than or equal to the stack entry size,
so that we can safely over-allocate the stack when we are unsure of the
stack allocation rules.
reviewed-by: Vincent Lejeune <vljn at ovi.com>
llvm-svn: 199842
different number of elements.
Bitcasts were passing with vectors of pointers with different number of
elements since the number of elements was checking
SrcTy->getVectorNumElements() == SrcTy->getVectorNumElements() which
isn't helpful. The addrspacecast was also wrong, but that case at least
is caught by the verifier. Refactor bitcast and addrspacecast handling
in castIsValid to be more readable and fix this problem.
llvm-svn: 199821
This patch restores the ARM mode if the user's inline assembly
does not. In the object streamer, it ensures that instructions
following the inline assembly are encoded correctly and that
correct mapping symbols are emitted. For the asm streamer, it
emits a .arm or .thumb directive.
This patch does not ensure that the inline assembly contains
the ADR instruction to switch modes at runtime.
The problem we need to solve is code like this:
int foo(int a, int b) {
int r = a + b;
asm volatile(
".align 2 \n"
".arm \n"
"add r0,r0,r0 \n"
: : "r"(r));
return r+1;
}
If we compile this function in thumb mode then the inline assembly
will switch to arm mode. We need to make sure that we switch back to
thumb mode after emitting the inline assembly or we will incorrectly
encode the instructions that follow (i.e. the assembly instructions
for return r+1).
Based on patch by David Peixotto
Change-Id: Ib57f6d2d78a22afad5de8693fba6230ff56ba48b
llvm-svn: 199818
This actually totally breaks and causes the machine verifier to cry in several cases, one of which being:
%RAX<def> = COPY %RCX<kill>
%ECX<def> = COPY %EAX<kill>, %RAX<imp-use,kill>
These subregister copies are together identified as noops, so are both removed. However, the second one as it has an imp-use gets converted into a kill:
%ECX<def> = KILL %EAX<kill>, %RAX<imp-use,kill>
As the original COPY has been removed, the verifier goes into tears at the use of undefined EAX and RAX.
There are several hacky solutions to this hacky problem (which is all to do with imp-use/def weirdnesses), but the least hacky I've come up with is to *always* remove COPYs by converting to KILLs. KILLs are no-ops to the code generator so the generated code doesn't change (which is why they were partially used in the first place), but using them also keeps the def/use and imp-def/imp-use chains alive:
%RAX<def> = KILL %RCX<kill>
%ECX<def> = KILL %EAX<kill>, %RAX<imp-use,kill>
The patch passes all test cases including the ones that check the removal of MOVs in this circumstance, along with an extra test I added to check subregister behaviour (which made the machine verifier fall over before my patch).
The patch also adds some DEBUG() statements because the file hadn't got any.
llvm-svn: 199797
