This obviously helps a lot if the division would be turned into a libcall
(think i64 udiv on i386), but div is also one of the few remaining instructions
on modern CPUs that become more expensive when the bitwidth gets bigger.
This also helps register pressure on i386 when dividing chars, divb needs
two 8-bit parts of a 16 bit register as input where divl uses two registers.
int foo(unsigned char a) { return a/10; }
int bar(unsigned char a, unsigned char b) { return a/b; }
compiles into (x86_64)
_foo:
imull $205, %edi, %eax
shrl $11, %eax
ret
_bar:
movzbl %dil, %eax
divb %sil, %al
movzbl %al, %eax
ret
llvm-svn: 130615
a nice and tidy:
%x1 = load i32* %0, align 4
%1 = icmp eq i32 %x1, 1179403647
br i1 %1, label %if.then, label %if.end
instead of doing lots of loads and branches. May the FreeBSD bootloader
long fit in its allocated space.
llvm-svn: 130416
wider load would allow elimination of subsequent loads, and when the wider
load is still a native integer type. This eliminates a ton of loads on
various benchmarks involving struct fields, though it is somewhat hobbled
by clang not being very aggressive about field alignment.
This is yet another step along the way towards resolving PR6627.
llvm-svn: 130390
Modified LinearFunctionTestReplace to push the condition on the dead
list instead of eagerly deleting it. This can cause unnecessary
IV rewrites, which should have no effect on codegen and will not be an
issue once we stop generating canonical IVs.
llvm-svn: 130340
1. Only run the early (in the module pass pipe) instcombine/simplifycfg
if the "unit at a time" passes they are cleaning up after runs.
2. Move the "clean up after the unroller" pass to the very end of the
function-level pass pipeline. Loop unroll uses instsimplify now,
so it doesn't create a ton of trash. Moving instcombine later allows
it to clean up after opportunities are exposed by GVN, DSE, etc.
3. Introduce some phase ordering tests for things that are specifically
intended to be simplified by the full optimizer as a whole.
This resolves PR2338, and is progress towards PR6627, which will be
generating code that looks similar to test2.
llvm-svn: 130241
when X has multiple uses. This is useful for exposing secondary optimizations,
but the X86 backend isn't ready for this when X has a single use. For example,
this can disable load folding.
This is inching towards resolving PR6627.
llvm-svn: 130238
return it as a clobber. This allows GVN to do smart things.
Enhance GVN to be smart about the case when a small load is clobbered
by a larger overlapping load. In this case, forward the value. This
allows us to compile stuff like this:
int test(void *P) {
int tmp = *(unsigned int*)P;
return tmp+*((unsigned char*)P+1);
}
into:
_test: ## @test
movl (%rdi), %ecx
movzbl %ch, %eax
addl %ecx, %eax
ret
which has one load. We already handled the case where the smaller
load was from a must-aliased base pointer.
llvm-svn: 130180
the same allocation size but different primitive sizes(e.g., <3xi32> and
<4xi32>). When ScalarRepl promotes them, it can't use a bit cast but
should use a shuffle vector instead.
llvm-svn: 129472
reassociation opportunities are exposed. This fixes a bug where
the nested reassociation expects to be the IR to be consistent,
but it isn't, because the outer reassociation has disconnected
some of the operands. rdar://9167457
llvm-svn: 129324
is equivalent to any other relevant value; it isn't true in general.
If it is equivalent, the LoopPromoter will tell the AST the equivalence.
Also, delete the PreheaderLoad if it is unused.
Chris, since you were the last one to make major changes here, can you check
that this is sane?
llvm-svn: 129049
space info. We crash with an assert in this case. This change checks that the
address space of the bitcasted pointer is the same as the gep ptr.
llvm-svn: 128884
after the given instruction; make sure to handle that case correctly.
(It's difficult to trigger; the included testcase involves a dead
block, but I don't think that's a requirement.)
While I'm here, get rid of the unnecessary warning about
SimplifyInstructionsInBlock, since it should work correctly as far as I know.
llvm-svn: 128782
that one of the numbers is signed while the other is unsigned. This could lead
to a wrong result when the signed was promoted to an unsigned int.
* Add the data layout line to the testcase so that it will test the appropriate
thing.
Patch by David Terei!
llvm-svn: 128577
