Note: I do not implement a base pointer, so it's still impossible to
have dynamic realignment AND dynamic alloca in the same function.
This also moves the code for determining the frame index reference
into getFrameIndexReference, where it belongs, instead of inline in
eliminateFrameIndex.
[Begin long-winded screed]
Now, stack realignment for Sparc is actually a silly thing to support,
because the Sparc ABI has no need for it -- unlike the situation on
x86, the stack is ALWAYS aligned to the required alignment for the CPU
instructions: 8 bytes on sparcv8, and 16 bytes on sparcv9.
However, LLVM unfortunately implements user-specified overalignment
using stack realignment support, so for now, I'm going to go along
with that tradition. GCC instead treats objects which have alignment
specification greater than the maximum CPU-required alignment for the
target as a separate block of stack memory, with their own virtual
base pointer (which gets aligned). Doing it that way avoids needing to
implement per-target support for stack realignment, except for the
targets which *actually* have an ABI-specified stack alignment which
is too small for the CPU's requirements.
Further unfortunately in LLVM, the default canRealignStack for all
targets effectively returns true, despite that implementing that is
something a target needs to do specifically. So, the previous behavior
on Sparc was to silently ignore the user's specified stack
alignment. Ugh.
Yet MORE unfortunate, if a target actually does return false from
canRealignStack, that also causes the user-specified alignment to be
*silently ignored*, rather than emitting an error.
(I started looking into fixing that last, but it broke a bunch of
tests, because LLVM actually *depends* on having it silently ignored:
some architectures (e.g. non-linux i386) have smaller stack alignment
than spilled-register alignment. But, the fact that a register needs
spilling is not known until within the register allocator. And by that
point, the decision to not reserve the frame pointer has been frozen
in place. And without a frame pointer, stack realignment is not
possible. So, canRealignStack() returns false, and
needsStackRealignment() then returns false, assuming everyone can just
go on their merry way assuming the alignment requirements were
probably just suggestions after-all. Sigh...)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12208
llvm-svn: 245668
The LDD/STD instructions can load/store a 64bit quantity from/to
memory to/from a consecutive even/odd pair of (32-bit) registers. They
are part of SparcV8, and also present in SparcV9. (Although deprecated
there, as you can store 64bits in one register).
As recommended on llvmdev in the thread "How to enable use of 64bit
load/store for 32bit architecture" from Apr 2015, I've modeled the
64-bit load/store operations as working on a v2i32 type, rather than
making i64 a legal type, but with few legal operations. The latter
does not (currently) work, as there is much code in llvm which assumes
that if i64 is legal, operations like "add" will actually work on it.
The same assumption does not hold for v2i32 -- for vector types, it is
workable to support only load/store, and expand everything else.
This patch:
- Adds a new register class, IntPair, for even/odd pairs of registers.
- Modifies the list of reserved registers, the stack spilling code,
and register copying code to support the IntPair register class.
- Adds support in AsmParser. (note that in asm text, you write the
name of the first register of the pair only. So the parser has to
morph the single register into the equivalent paired register).
- Adds the new instructions themselves (LDD/STD/LDDA/STDA).
- Hooks up the instructions and registers as a vector type v2i32. Adds
custom legalizer to transform i64 load/stores into v2i32 load/stores
and bitcasts, so that the new instructions can actually be
generated, and marks all operations other than load/store on v2i32
as needing to be expanded.
- Copies the unfortunate SelectInlineAsm hack from ARMISelDAGToDAG.
This hack undoes the transformation of i64 operands into two
arbitrarily-allocated separate i32 registers in
SelectionDAGBuilder. and instead passes them in a single
IntPair. (Arbitrarily allocated registers are not useful, asm code
expects to be receiving a pair, which can be passed to ldd/std.)
Also adds a bunch of test cases covering all the bugs I've added along
the way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8713
llvm-svn: 244484
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
system headers above the includes of generated '.inc' files that
actually contain code. In a few targets this was already done pretty
consistently, but it wasn't done *really* consistently anywhere. It is
strictly cleaner IMO and necessary in a bunch of places where the
DEBUG_TYPE is referenced from the generated code. Consistency with the
necessary places trumps. Hopefully the build bots are OK with the
movement of intrin.h...
llvm-svn: 206838
In sparc, setjmp stores only the registers %fp, %sp, %i7 and %o7. longjmp restores
the stack, and the callee-saved registers (all local/in registers: %i0-%i7, %l0-%l7)
using the stored %fp and register windows. However, this does not guarantee that the longjmp
will restore the registers, as they were when the setjmp was called. This is because these
registers may be clobbered after returning from setjmp, but before calling longjmp.
This patch prevents the registers %i0-%i5, %l0-l7 to live across the setjmp call using the register mask.
llvm-svn: 190033
This field specifies registers that are preserved across function calls,
but that should not be included in the generates SaveList array.
This can be used ot generate regmasks for architectures that save
registers through other means, like SPARC's register windows.
llvm-svn: 189084
64-bit SPARC v9 processes use biased stack and frame pointers, so the
current function's stack frame is located at %sp+BIAS .. %fp+BIAS where
BIAS = 2047.
This makes more local variables directly accessible via [%fp+simm13]
addressing.
llvm-svn: 178965
We are going to use the same registers for 32-bit and 64-bit values, but
in two different register classes. The I64Regs register class has a
larger spill size and alignment.
The addition of an i64 register class confuses TableGen's type
inference, so it is necessary to clarify the type of some immediates and
the G0 register.
In 64-bit mode, pointers are i64 and should use the I64Regs register
class. Implement getPointerRegClass() to dynamically provide the pointer
register class depending on the subtarget. Use ptr_rc and iPTR for
memory operands.
Finally, add the i64 type to the IntRegs register class. This register
class is not used to hold i64 values, I64Regs is for that. The type is
required to appease TableGen's type checking in output patterns like this:
def : Pat<(add i64:$a, i64:$b), (ADDrr $a, $b)>;
SPARC v9 uses the same ADDrr instruction for i32 and i64 additions, and
TableGen doesn't know to check the type of register sub-classes.
llvm-svn: 178522
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
llvm-svn: 175788
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
to MCRegisterInfo. Also initialize the mapping at construction time.
This patch eliminate TargetRegisterInfo from TargetAsmInfo. It's another step
towards fixing the layering violation.
llvm-svn: 135424
target machine from those that are only needed by codegen. The goal is to
sink the essential target description into MC layer so we can start building
MC based tools without needing to link in the entire codegen.
First step is to refactor TargetRegisterInfo. This patch added a base class
MCRegisterInfo which TargetRegisterInfo is derived from. Changed TableGen to
separate register description from the rest of the stuff.
llvm-svn: 133782
The register allocators automatically filter out reserved registers and
place the callee saved registers last in the allocation order, so custom
methods are no longer necessary just for that.
Some targets still use custom allocation orders:
ARM/Thumb: The high registers are removed from GPR in thumb mode. The
NEON allocation orders prefer to use non-VFP2 registers first.
X86: The GR8 classes omit AH-DH in x86-64 mode to avoid REX trouble.
SystemZ: Some of the allocation orders are omitting R12 aliases without
explanation. I don't understand this target well enough to fix that. It
looks like all the boilerplate could be removed by reserving the right
registers.
llvm-svn: 132781
is preparatory to having PEI's scavenged frame index value reuse logic
properly distinguish types of frame values (e.g., whether the value is
stack-pointer relative or frame-pointer relative).
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 98086
a virtual register to eliminate a frame index, it can return that register
and the constant stored there to PEI to track. When scavenging to allocate
for those registers, PEI then tracks the last-used register and value, and
if it is still available and matches the value for the next index, reuses
the existing value rather and removes the re-materialization instructions.
Fancier tracking and adjustment of scavenger allocations to keep more
values live for longer is possible, but not yet implemented and would likely
be better done via a different, less special-purpose, approach to the
problem.
eliminateFrameIndex() is modified so the target implementations can return
the registers they wish to be tracked for reuse.
ARM Thumb1 implements and utilizes the new mechanism. All other targets are
simply modified to adjust for the changed eliminateFrameIndex() prototype.
llvm-svn: 83467
This adds location info for all llvm_unreachable calls (which is a macro now) in
!NDEBUG builds.
In NDEBUG builds location info and the message is off (it only prints
"UREACHABLE executed").
llvm-svn: 75640
