1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-22 20:43:44 +02:00
Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Malcolm Parsons
7d3f8f07ac Update Doxygen comment in StringSaver (NFC)
llvm-svn: 289196
2016-12-09 09:33:33 +00:00
Mehdi Amini
e3ebb14e8a Use StringRef in StringSaver API (NFC)
llvm-svn: 283290
2016-10-05 01:32:41 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
de2ec4a63f There is only one saver of strings.
llvm-svn: 244854
2015-08-13 01:07:02 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko
f993659b8f Revert r240137 (Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC)
Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.

llvm-svn: 240390
2015-06-23 09:49:53 +00:00
Alexander Kornienko
40cb19d802 Fixed/added namespace ending comments using clang-tidy. NFC
The patch is generated using this command:

tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
  -checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
  llvm/lib/


Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!

llvm-svn: 240137
2015-06-19 15:57:42 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
3e9c3a2ef1 Bring in a BumpPtrStringSaver from lld and simplify the interface.
StringSaver now always saves to a BumpPtrAllocator.

The only reason for having the virtual saveImpl is so lld can have a
thread safe version.

The reason for the distinct BumpPtrStringSaver class is to avoid the
virtual destructor.

llvm-svn: 239669
2015-06-13 12:49:52 +00:00
Sean Silva
3e323f9026 Revert "[Support] Promote cl::StringSaver to a separate utility"
This reverts commit r215784 / 3f8a26f6fe16cc76c98ab21db2c600bd7defbbaa.

LLD has 3 StringSaver's, one of which takes a lock when saving the
string... Need to investigate more closely.

llvm-svn: 215790
2014-08-15 23:39:01 +00:00
Sean Silva
4650d2b2ad [Support] Promote cl::StringSaver to a separate utility
This class is generally useful.

In breaking it out, the primary change is that it has been made
non-virtual. It seems like being abstract led to there being 3 different
(2 in llvm + 1 in clang) concrete implementations which disagreed about
the ownership of the saved strings (see the manual call to free() in the
unittest StrDupSaver; yes this is different from the CommandLine.cpp
StrDupSaver which owns the stored strings; which is different from
Clang's StringSetSaver which just holds a reference to a
std::set<std::string> which owns the strings).

I've identified 2 other places in the
codebase that are open-coding this pattern:

  memcpy(Alloc.Allocate<char>(strlen(S)+1), S, strlen(S)+1)

I'll be switching them over. They are
* llvm::sys::Process::GetArgumentVector
* The StringAllocator member of YAMLIO's Input class
This also will allow simplifying Clang's driver.cpp quite a bit.

Let me know if there are any other places that could benefit from
StringSaver. I'm also thinking of adding a saveStringRef member for
getting a stable StringRef.

llvm-svn: 215784
2014-08-15 23:18:33 +00:00