to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This implements DebugInfoPDB when the DIA SDK is present on the system.
Specifically, this means that the following conditions are met:
1) You are building on Windows.
2) You are building with MSVC.
3) Visual Studio did not corrupt the installation of DIA due to a
known issue with side-by-side installations of VS2012 and VS2013.
If all of these conditions are true, you will be able to pass a value
of PDB_Reader::DIA to PDB::createPdbReader().
There are no tests for this yet, as any test will be in the form of a
lit test which tests the llvm-pdbdump.exe, which still needs to be
rewritten in terms of this library.
llvm-svn: 228747
