Instruction has mayHaveSideEffects method that returns true if mayThrow return true because this is called internally in the first method. As such, the call being removed is redundant.
Patch By: vdsered (Daniil Seredkin)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101685
The test is a crasher reduced from:
https://llvm.org/PR49993
linearFunctionTestReplace() assumes that we have an add recurrence,
so check for that as a condition of matching a loop counter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101291
The code is assuming that having an exact exit count for the loop implies that exit counts for every exit are known. This used to be true, but when we added handling for dead exits we broke this invariant. The new invariant is that an exact loop count implies that any exits non trivially dead have exit counts.
We could have fixed this by either a) explicitly checking for a dead exit, or b) just testing for SCEVCouldNotCompute. I chose the second as it was simpler.
(Debugging this took longer than it should have since I'd mistyped the original assert and it wasn't checking what it was meant to...)
p.s. Sorry for the lack of test case. Getting things into a state to actually hit this is difficult and fragile. The original repro involves loop-deletion leaving SCEV in a slightly inprecise state which lets us bypass other transforms in IndVarSimplify on the way to this one. All of my attempts to separate it into a standalone test failed.
When bailing out in rewriteLoopExitValues() you could be left with PHI
nodes in the DeadInsts vector. Those would be not handled by the use of
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions() in IndVarSimplify. This
resulted in the IndVarSimplify pass returning an incorrect modified
status. This was caught by the expensive check introduced in D86589.
This patches changes IndVarSimplify so that it deletes those PHI nodes,
using RecursivelyDeleteDeadPHINode().
This fixes PR47486.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91153
Some nested loops may share the same ExitingBB, so after we finishing FoldExit,
we need to notify OuterLoop and SCEV to drop any stored trip count.
Patched by: guopeilin
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91325
In some cases we can handle IV and iter count of different types. It's a typical situation
after IV have been widened. This patch adds support for such cases, when legal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88528
Reviewed By: skatkov
If we cannot prove that the check is trivially true, but can prove that it either
fails on the 1st iteration or never fails, we can replace it with first iteration check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88527
Reviewed By: skatkov
This moves WidenIV from IndVarSimplify to Utils/SimplifyIndVar so that we have
createWideIV available as a generic helper utility. I.e., this is not only
useful in IndVarSimplify, but could be useful for loop transformations. For
example, motivation for this refactoring is the loop flatten transformation: if
induction variables in a loop nest can be widened, we can avoid having to
perform certain overflow checks, enabling this transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90421
If we know that some check will not be executed on the last iteration, we can use this
fact to eliminate its check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88210
Reviwed By: ebrevnov
This reverts commit e038b60d9169733367393f733058f0ff23c28d3f.
This reverts commit a0d84d80315d0c725b5efcd889928bad1171ba56.
This revert was a mistake. The reason of the failures was
"Use uint64_t for branch weights instead of uint32_t"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87832
This reverts commit c6ca26c0bfedb8f80d6f8cb9adde25b1d6aac1c5.
This breaks stage2 builds due to hitting this assert:
```
Assertion failed: (WeightSum <= UINT32_MAX && "Expected weights to scale down to 32 bits"), function calcMetadataWeights
```
when compiling AArch64RegisterBankInfo.cpp in LLVM.
Even if the exact exit count is unknown, we can still prove that this
exit will not be taken. If we can prove that the predicate is monotonic,
fulfilled on first & last iteration, and no overflow happened in between,
then the check can be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87832
Reviewed By: apilipenko
We want to have a caching version of symbolic BE exit count
rather than recompute it every time we need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89954
Reviewed By: nikic, efriedma
Logic of widenWithVariantUse is split into check and transform
part, unlike any other transform in IndVars. We want to pass some
extra flags from analysis to transform part and standartize
the code at once, so merging them together.
Variable ExtendOperExpr only exists to check whether it is a SCEV ext.
We create it as SCEV ext right here, so semantically this check is
trivially true. In theory, it may fail if SCEV is smart enough and can
simplify the expression. However, no matter whether it is an ext or not,
we never use this fact for further reasoning. So this code is currently
useless and in theory may become harmful with SCEV's development.
We do not expect any behavior changes with removing it. If it caused
negative changes, the patch should be reverted.
Some facts have already been checked in widenWithVariantUse and then
checked again in widenWithVariantUseCodegen. The latter is redundant,
we can replace it with asserts.
IV widening is sometimes a strictly harmful transform (some examples
of this are shown in tests 11, 12 in widen-loop-comp.ll). One of the
reasons of this is that sometimes SCEV fails to prove some facts after
part of guards has been widened.
Though each single such case looks like a bug that can be addressed,
it seems that disabling of IV widening may be profitable in some cases.
We want to have an option to do so. By default, existing behavior is
preserved and IV widening is on.
From preconditions it is known that either A dominates B or
B dominates A. If A does not dominate B, we do not really need
to check it. Assert should be enough. Should save some compile
time.
When removing exiting loop conditions, we only consider checks for
which we know the exact exit count. We could also eliminate checks for
which the condition is always true/false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87344
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, reames
This patch adds isGuaranteedNotToBePoison and programUndefinedIfUndefOrPoison.
isGuaranteedNotToBePoison will be used at D75808. The latter function is used at isGuaranteedNotToBePoison.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84242
The block front may be a PHI node, inserting a cast instructions like
BitCast, PtrToInt, IntToPtr among PHIs is not right.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80975
SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.
This patch was originally committed as b8a3c34eee06, but broke the
modules build, as LoopAccessAnalysis was using the Expander.
The code-gen part of LAA was moved to lib/Transforms recently, so this
patch can be landed again.
Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames
Reviewed By: sanjoy.google
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537
Summary:
This is RFC for fixes in poison-related functions of ValueTracking.
These functions assume that a value can be poison bitwisely, but the semantics
of bitwise poison is not clear at the moment.
Allowing a value to have bitwise poison adds complexity to reasoning about
correctness of optimizations.
This patch makes the analysis functions simply assume that a value is
either fully poison or not, which has been used to understand the correctness
of a few previous optimizations.
The bitwise poison semantics seems to be only used by these functions as well.
In terms of implementation, using value-wise poison concept makes existing
functions do more precise analysis, which is what this patch contains.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, reames, nikic, nlopes, regehr
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78503
Summary:
This is RFC for fixes in poison-related functions of ValueTracking.
These functions assume that a value can be poison bitwisely, but the semantics
of bitwise poison is not clear at the moment.
Allowing a value to have bitwise poison adds complexity to reasoning about
correctness of optimizations.
This patch makes the analysis functions simply assume that a value is
either fully poison or not, which has been used to understand the correctness
of a few previous optimizations.
The bitwise poison semantics seems to be only used by these functions as well.
In terms of implementation, using value-wise poison concept makes existing
functions do more precise analysis, which is what this patch contains.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, reames, nikic, nlopes, regehr
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78503
