1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-31 16:02:52 +01:00
Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Blaikie
7c3ec60da7 Remove the (apparently) unnecessary debug info metadata indirection.
The main lists of debug info metadata attached to the compile_unit had an extra
layer of metadata nodes they went through for no apparent reason. This patch
removes that (& still passes just as much of the GDB 7.5 test suite). If anyone
can show evidence as to why these extra metadata nodes are there I'm open to
reverting this patch & documenting why they're there.

llvm-svn: 174266
2013-02-02 05:56:24 +00:00
Bill Wendling
32e4544198 Use the 'count' attribute to calculate the upper bound of an array.
The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.

llvm-svn: 169312
2012-12-04 21:34:03 +00:00
Bill Wendling
8ade948576 Add a 'count' field to the DWARF subrange.
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.

llvm-svn: 169218
2012-12-04 06:20:49 +00:00
Eric Christopher
b3e4c78741 Revert "Use the 'count' attribute instead of the 'upper_bound' attribute."
temporarily as it is breaking the gdb bots.

This reverts commit r167806/e7ff4c14b157746b3e0228d2dce9f70712d1c126.

llvm-svn: 167886
2012-11-13 23:30:43 +00:00
Bill Wendling
ab44d906b6 Use the 'count' attribute instead of the 'upper_bound' attribute.
If we have a type 'int a[1]' and a type 'int b[0]', the generated DWARF is the
same for both of them because we use the 'upper_bound' attribute. Instead use
the 'count' attrbute, which gives the correct number of elements in the array.
<rdar://problem/12566646>

llvm-svn: 167806
2012-11-13 02:31:47 +00:00
Devang Patel
a0973b0c53 DISubrange supports unsigned lower/upper array bounds, so let's not fake it in the end while emitting DWARF. If a FE needs to encode signed lower/upper array bounds then we need to extend DISubrange or ad DISignedSubrange.
llvm-svn: 144937
2011-11-17 23:43:15 +00:00