I didn't notice any significant changes in the actual checks here;
all of these tests already used FileCheck, so a script can batch
update them in one shot.
This commit is just to show the value of automating this process:
We have uniform formatting as opposed to a mish-mash of check
structure that changes based on individual prefs and the current
fashion. This makes it simpler to update when we find a bug or
make an enhancement.
llvm-svn: 264457
This changes RS4GC to lower calls to ``@llvm.experimental.deoptimize``
to gc.statepoints wrapping ``__llvm_deoptimize``, and changes
``callsGCLeafFunction`` to recognize ``@llvm.experimental.deoptimize``
as a non GC leaf function.
I've had to hard code the ``"__llvm_deoptimize"`` name in
RewriteStatepointsForGC; since ``TargetLibraryInfo`` is available only
during codegen. This isn't without precedent in the codebase, so I'm
not overtly concerned.
llvm-svn: 264456
This fixes a use-after-free introduced 3 years ago, in r182872 ;)
The code more or less worked because the memory that CopyMI was
pointing to happened to still be valid, but lots of tests would crash
if you ran under ASAN with the recycling allocator changes from
llvm.org/PR26808
llvm-svn: 264455
It is possible to have a fallthrough MBB prior to MBB placement. The original
addition of the BB would result in reordering the BB as not preceding the
successor. Because of the fallthrough nature of the BB, we could end up
executing incorrect code or even a constant pool island! Insert the spliced BB
into the same location to avoid that.
Thanks to Tim Northover for invaluable hints and Fiora for the discussion on
what may have been occurring!
llvm-svn: 264454
This is a recommit of r264414 after fixing the buildbot failure caused by
incompatible use of std::vector.erase().
The original message:
Add erase() which returns an iterator pointing to the next element after the
erased one. This makes it possible to erase selected elements while iterating
over the SetVector :
while (I != E)
if (test(*I))
I = SetVector.erase(I);
else
++I;
Reviewers: qcolombet, mcrosier, MatzeB, dblaikie
Subscribers: dberlin, dblaikie, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18281
llvm-svn: 264450
We're erasing MI here, but then immediately using it again inside the
`if`. This moves the erase after we're done using it.
Doing that reveals a second problem though - this case is missing a
break, so we fall through to the default and dereference MI again.
This is obviously a bug, though I don't know how to write a test that
triggers it - all we do in the error case is print some extra debug
output.
Both of these issue crash on lots of tests under ASAN with the
recycling allocator changes from PR26808 applied.
llvm-svn: 264442
64-bit, 32-bit and 16-bit move-immediate instructions are 7, 6, and 5 bytes,
respectively, whereas and/or with 8-bit immediate is only three bytes.
Since these instructions imply an additional memory read (which the CPU could
elide, but we don't think it does), restrict these patterns to minsize functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18374
llvm-svn: 264440
Now register parameters that aren't saved to the stack or CSRs are
considered dead after the first call. Previously the debugger would show
whatever was in the register.
Fixes PR26589
Reviewers: aprantl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17211
llvm-svn: 264429
This keeps the naming consistent with Chapters 6-8, where Error was renamed to
LogError in r264426 to avoid clashes with the new Error class in libSupport.
llvm-svn: 264427
Summary:
Add erase() which returns an iterator pointing to the next element after the
erased one. This makes it possible to erase selected elements while iterating
over the SetVector :
while (I != E)
if (test(*I))
I = SetVector.erase(I);
else
++I;
Reviewers: qcolombet, mcrosier, MatzeB, dblaikie
Subscribers: dberlin, dblaikie, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18281
llvm-svn: 264414
Optimize output of MDStrings in bitcode. This emits them in big blocks
(currently 1024) in a pair of records:
- BULK_STRING_SIZES: the sizes of the strings in the block, and
- BULK_STRING_DATA: a single blob, which is the concatenation of all
the strings.
Inspired by Mehdi's similar patch, http://reviews.llvm.org/D18342, this
should (a) slightly reduce bitcode size, since there is less record
overhead, and (b) greatly improve reading speed, since blobs are super
cheap to deserialize.
I needed to add support for blobs to streaming input to get the test
suite passing.
- StreamingMemoryObject::getPointer reads ahead and returns the
address of the blob.
- To avoid a possible reallocation of StreamingMemoryObject::Bytes,
BitstreamCursor::readRecord needs to move the call to JumpToEnd
forward so that getPointer is the last bitstream operation.
llvm-svn: 264409
LowerShift was using the same code as Lower256IntArith to split 256-bit vectors into 2 x 128-bit vectors, so now we just call Lower256IntArith.
llvm-svn: 264403
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18456
This is a re-commit of r264387 and r264388 after fixing a typo.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 264392
This reverts commit r264387.
Bots are broken in various ways, I need to take one commit at a time...
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 264390
This reverts commit r264388.
Bots are broken in various ways, I need to take one commit at a time...
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 264389
Summary:
Loading IR with debug info improves MDString::get() from 19ms to 10ms.
This is a rework of D16597 with adding an "emplace" method on the StringMap
to avoid requiring the MDString move ctor to be public.
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17920
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 264386
Summary:
StringMap ctor accepts an initialize size, but expect it to be
rounded to the next power of 2. The ctor can handle that directly
instead of expecting clients to round it. Also, since the map will
resize itself when 75% full, take this into account an initialize
a larger initial size to avoid any growth.
Reviewers: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18344
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 264385
Summary:
Just running the loop in the unittests for a few more iterations
(till 48) exhibit that the condition on the limit was not handled
properly in r263522.
Rewrite the test to use a class to count move/copies that happens
when inserting into the map.
Also take the opportunity to refactor the logic to compute the
number of buckets required for a given number of entries in the map.
Use this when constructing a DenseMap with a desired size given to
the constructor (and add a tests for this).
Reviewers: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18345
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 264384
