1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-26 04:32:44 +01:00
Commit Graph

69 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bjorn Pettersson
29ffba4b56 Update @llvm.powi to handle different int sizes for the exponent
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705e82a4fe20e2,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.

The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.

One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
2021-06-17 09:38:28 +02:00
Sanjay Patel
03cd031cb2 [ValueTracking] add FP intrinsics to test for propagatesPoison; NFC
I'm not sure what behavior we want if the FP environment is
not default (also not sure if there's a way to enumerate
the full list of intrinsics programmatically), but currently
these are all defaulting to 'false' (doesn't propagate).
2021-06-16 13:43:03 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
be210d2cc2 [ValueTracking] add tests for propagatesPoison with FP ops; NFC
Verify that this matches the behavior in InstSimplify:
D104383 / ce95200b7942

We still need to add code/tests for FP intrinsics.
2021-06-16 12:14:28 -04:00
Simon Pilgrim
27b7e8e2e7 ValueTrackingTest.cpp - Pass DataLayout by reference. NFCI. 2021-06-08 10:41:01 +01:00
Benjamin Kramer
62a029fa79 Bump googletest to 1.10.0 2021-05-14 19:16:31 +02:00
Sanjay Patel
7d78140278 [ValueTracking] match negative-stepping non-zero recurrence
This is pulled out of D100408.

This avoids a regression that would be exposed by making the
calling code from InstSimplify more efficient.
2021-04-14 08:57:53 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
aead0cfbc4 [ValueTracking] add unit test for isKnownNonZero(); NFC
We call various value tracking APIs from within -instsimplify,
so I don't think this is visible in a larger test.
2021-04-14 08:06:26 -04:00
Juneyoung Lee
3e94a07500 [ValueTracking] Add with.overflow intrinsics to poison analysis functions
This is a patch teaching ValueTracking that `s/u*.with.overflow` intrinsics do not
create undef/poison and they propagate poison.
I couldn't write a nice example like the one with ctpop; ValueTrackingTest.cpp were simply updated
to check these instead.
This patch helps reducing regression while fixing https://llvm.org/pr49688 .

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99671
2021-04-01 02:41:38 +09:00
Nikita Popov
a78d45f1a3 [ValueTracking] Don't assume readonly function will return
This is similar to D94106, but for the
isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor() helper. We should not
assume that readonly functions will return, as this is only true for
mustprogress functions (in which case we already infer willreturn).
As with the DCE change, for now continue assuming that readonly
intrinsics will return, as not all target intrinsics have been
annotated yet.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95288
2021-01-24 10:40:21 +01:00
Nikita Popov
d56d32f92d [ValueTracking] Strengthen impliesPoison reasoning
Split impliesPoison into two recursive walks, one over V, the
other over ValAssumedPoison. This allows us to reason about poison
implications in a number of additional cases that are important
in practice. This is a generalized form of D94859, which handles
the cmp to cmp implication in particular.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94866
2021-01-19 18:04:23 +01:00
Markus Lavin
8e1b636cfa [ValueTracking] Fix one s/dyn_cast/dyn_cast_or_null/
Handle if Constant::getAggregateElement() returns nullptr in
canCreateUndefOrPoison().

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94494
2021-01-13 13:39:53 +01:00
Juneyoung Lee
691497c4e5 [Constant] Add containsPoisonElement
This patch

- Adds containsPoisonElement that checks existence of poison in constant vector elements,
- Renames containsUndefElement to containsUndefOrPoisonElement to clarify its behavior & updates its uses properly

With this patch, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison's tests w.r.t constant vectors are added because its analysis is improved.

Thanks!

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94053
2021-01-06 12:10:33 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
abd383d357 [ValueTracking] isGuaranteedNotToBePoison should return true on undef
This is a one-line fix to isGuaranteedNotToBePoison to return true if
undef is given.
2021-01-05 06:50:02 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
96c4f8eeca [ValueTracking] Implement impliesPoison
This PR adds impliesPoison(ValAssumedPoison, V) that returns true if V is
poison under the assumption that ValAssumedPoison is poison.

For example, impliesPoison('icmp X, 10', 'icmp X, Y') return true because
'icmp X, Y' is poison if 'icmp X, 10' is poison.

impliesPoison can be used for sound optimization of select, as discussed in
D77868.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78152
2020-12-29 06:50:38 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
545caba6c2 [ValueTracking] Use m_LogicalAnd/Or to look into conditions
This patch updates isImpliedCondition/isKnownNonZero to look into select form of
and/or as well.

See llvm.org/pr48353 and D93065 for more context

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93845
2020-12-28 08:32:45 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
0eb41a93d1 [ValueTracking] Add unit tests for isKnownNonZero, isImpliedCondition (NFC) 2020-12-28 06:32:57 +09:00
Nikita Popov
ce83e92d77 [ValueTracking] Fix assert on shufflevector of pointers
In this case getScalarSizeInBits() is not well-defined. Use the
existing TyBits variable that handles vectors of pointers correctly.
2020-11-27 21:19:31 +01:00
Alex Richardson
58c20890b0 [ValueTracking] Add more tests for alignment assume bundles
I noticed that alignment was no longer inferred as well after I last merged
our CHERI fork from upstream. I opened this review before seeing that D88669
already fixes the same problem, so this commit simply adds the new test that
I added as part of this change.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89830
2020-10-27 12:16:45 +00:00
Quentin Colombet
02a2d13fbf [ValueTracking] Interpret GEPs as a series of adds multiplied by the related scaling factor
Prior to this patch, computeKnownBits would only try to deduce trailing zeros
bits for getelementptrs. This patch adds the logic to treat geps as a series
of add * scaling factor.

Thanks to this patch, using a gep or performing an address computation
directly "by hand" (ptrtoint followed by adds and mul followed by inttoptr)
offers the same computeKnownBits information.

Previously, the "by hand" approach would have given more information.

This is related to https://llvm.org/PR47241.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86364
2020-10-21 15:07:04 -07:00
Juneyoung Lee
7534326bff [ValueTracking] Use assume's noundef operand bundle
This patch updates `isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison` to use `llvm.assume`'s `noundef` operand bundle.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89219
2020-10-14 20:16:33 +09:00
Quentin Colombet
9a66924cac [unittests] Add a few tests for computeKnownBits with ranges
These tests make sure that the range information is properly
understood during computeKnownBits analysis.

NFC

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88934
2020-10-08 11:33:06 -07:00
Juneyoung Lee
31a4179ce0 [ValueTracking] Fix analyses to update CxtI to be phi's incoming edges' terminators
It was mentioned that D88276 that when a phi node is visited, terminators at their incoming edges should be used for CtxI.
This is a patch that makes two functions (ComputeNumSignBitsImpl, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison) to do so.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88360
2020-09-28 23:24:20 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
4311585bec [ValueTracking] Check uses of Argument if it is given to isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison
This is a patch that allows isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison to return more precise result
when an argument is given, by looking through its uses at the entry block (and following blocks as well, if it is checking poison only).

This is useful when there is a function call with noundef arguments at the entry block.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88207
2020-09-25 08:57:57 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
55591e689c [ValueTracking] isKnownNonZero, computeKnownBits for freeze
This implements support for isKnownNonZero, computeKnownBits when freeze is involved.

```
  br (x != 0), BB1, BB2
BB1:
  y = freeze x
```

In the above program, we can say that y is non-zero. The reason is as follows:

(1) If x was poison, `br (x != 0)` raised UB
(2) If x was fully undef, the branch again raised UB
(3) If x was non-zero partially undef, say `undef | 1`, `freeze x` will return a nondeterministic value which is also non-zero.
(4) If x was just a concrete value, it is trivial

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75808
2020-09-10 08:07:38 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
bd9d25252a [ValueTracking] Add UndefOrPoison/Poison-only version of relevant functions
This patch adds isGuaranteedNotToBePoison and programUndefinedIfUndefOrPoison.

isGuaranteedNotToBePoison will be used at D75808. The latter function is used at isGuaranteedNotToBePoison.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84242
2020-09-09 20:00:26 +09:00
Vitaly Buka
2df7657efb [ValueTracking] Replace recursion with Worklist
Now findAllocaForValue can handle nontrivial phi cycles.
2020-08-27 14:44:49 -07:00
Vitaly Buka
4f88f9a474 [NFC][ValueTracking] Add OffsetZero into findAllocaForValue
For StackLifetime after finding alloca we need to check that
values ponting to the begining of alloca.

Reviewed By: eugenis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86692
2020-08-27 13:46:22 -07:00
Vitaly Buka
c66ff34562 [NFC][ValueTracking] Cleanup a test 2020-08-27 03:25:10 -07:00
Vitaly Buka
368c7592ca [NFC][ValueTracking] Fix typo in test 2020-08-27 03:01:30 -07:00
Vitaly Buka
afd0abc1f8 [ValueTracking] Support select in findAllocaForValue 2020-08-27 02:13:52 -07:00
Vitaly Buka
f918804878 [NFC] Add unittests for findAllocaForValue 2020-08-27 01:54:19 -07:00
Juneyoung Lee
c1dd435508 Fix ValueTrackingTest.cpp to use pair instead of tuple 2020-07-20 02:22:02 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
563c63fea8 [ValueTracking] Add canCreateUndefOrPoison & let canCreatePoison use Operator
This patch
- adds `canCreateUndefOrPoison`
- refactors `canCreatePoison` so it can deal with constantexprs

`canCreateUndefOrPoison` will be used at D83926.

Reviewed By: nikic, jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84007
2020-07-20 01:24:30 +09:00
Florian Hahn
dbd4f386aa [ValueTracking] Use assumptions in computeConstantRange.
This patch updates computeConstantRange to optionally take an assumption
cache as argument and use the available assumptions to limit the range
of the result.

Currently this is limited to assumptions that are comparisons.

Reviewers: reames, nikic, spatel, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76193
2020-05-23 20:07:52 +01:00
Nikita Popov
14ba2f0ba5 [ValueTracking] Fix computeKnownBits() with bitwidth-changing ptrtoint
computeKnownBitsFromAssume() currently asserts if m_V matches a
ptrtoint that changes the bitwidth. Because InstCombine
canonicalizes ptrtoint instructions to use explicit zext/trunc,
we never ran into the issue in practice. I'm adding unit tests,
as I don't know if this can be triggered via IR anywhere.

Fix this by calling anyextOrTrunc(BitWidth) on the computed
KnownBits. Note that we are going from the KnownBits of the
ptrtoint result to the KnownBits of the ptrtoint operand,
so we need to truncate if the ptrtoint zexted and anyext if
the ptrtoint truncated.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79234
2020-05-16 14:17:11 +02:00
Juneyoung Lee
d6be273bbc [ValueTracking] Let propagatesPoison support binops/unaryops/cast/etc.
Summary:
This patch makes propagatesPoison be more accurate by returning true on
more bin ops/unary ops/casts/etc.

The changed test in ScalarEvolution/nsw.ll was introduced by
a19edc4d15 .
IIUC, the goal of the tests is to show that iv.inc's SCEV expression still has
no-overflow flags even if the loop isn't in the wanted form.
It becomes more accurate with this patch, so think this is okay.

Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, reames, nikic, sanjoy

Reviewed By: spatel, nikic

Subscribers: regehr, nlopes, efriedma, fhahn, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78615
2020-05-13 02:51:42 +09:00
Nikita Popov
0eae65a653 [ValueTracking] Convert test to unit test (NFC)
Test this directly, rather than going through InstSimplify.
2020-05-03 12:23:57 +02:00
Craig Topper
16d452e561 [CallSite removal][ValueTracking] Use CallBase instead of ImmutableCallSite for getIntrinsicForCallSite. NFC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78613
2020-04-22 12:06:58 -07:00
Juneyoung Lee
64eac7a6cd [ValueTracking] Implement canCreatePoison
Summary:
This PR adds `canCreatePoison(Instruction *I)` which returns true if `I` can generate poison from non-poison
operands.

Reviewers: spatel, nikic, lebedev.ri

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, regehr, nlopes

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77890
2020-04-15 05:58:06 +09:00
Sanjay Patel
6f09e0c039 [ValueTracking] enhance matching of umin/umax with 'not' operands
The cmyk test is based on the known regression that resulted from:
rGf2fbdf76d8d0

This improves on the equivalent signed min/max change:
rG867f0c3c4d8c

The underlying icmp equivalence is:
  ~X pred ~Y --> Y pred X

For an icmp with constant, canonicalization results in a swapped pred:
  ~X < C -->  X > ~C
2020-04-06 11:51:59 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
9c389cc269 [ValueTracking] add/adjust tests for min/max; NFC 2020-04-06 11:14:05 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
e9fc5c66f0 [ValueTracking] enhance matching of smin/smax with 'not' operands
The cmyk tests are based on the known regression that resulted from:
rGf2fbdf76d8d0

So this improvement in analysis might be enough to restore that commit.
2020-04-05 08:54:12 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
1e300cdd8c [ValueTracking] add tests for smin/smax; NFC 2020-04-04 13:44:06 -04:00
Vitaly Buka
efa8f57b0d isBytewiseValue checks ConstantVector element by element
Summary: Vector of the same value with few undefs will sill be considered "Bytewise"

Reviewers: eugenis, pcc, jfb

Reviewed By: jfb

Subscribers: dexonsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64031

llvm-svn: 365971
2019-07-12 22:37:55 +00:00
Vitaly Buka
66c24fb668 Return Undef from isBytewiseValue for empty arrays or structs
Reviewers: pcc, eugenis

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64052

llvm-svn: 365864
2019-07-12 02:23:07 +00:00
Vitaly Buka
b875fd735d Handle IntToPtr in isBytewiseValue
Summary:
This helps with more efficient use of memset for pattern initialization

From @pcc prototype for -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern optimizations

Binary size change on CTMark, (with -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--icf=all, similar results with default linker options)
```
                   master           patch      diff
Os           8.238864e+05    8.238864e+05       0.0
O3           1.054797e+06    1.054797e+06       0.0
Os zero      8.292384e+05    8.292384e+05       0.0
O3 zero      1.062626e+06    1.062626e+06       0.0
Os pattern   8.579712e+05    8.338048e+05 -0.030299
O3 pattern   1.090502e+06    1.067574e+06 -0.020481
```

Zero vs Pattern on master
```
               zero       pattern      diff
Os     8.292384e+05  8.579712e+05  0.036578
O3     1.062626e+06  1.090502e+06  0.025124
```

Zero vs Pattern with the patch
```
               zero       pattern      diff
Os     8.292384e+05  8.338048e+05  0.003333
O3     1.062626e+06  1.067574e+06  0.003193
```

Reviewers: pcc, eugenis

Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63967

llvm-svn: 365858
2019-07-12 01:42:03 +00:00
Mikael Holmen
bca59d7f71 [test] Silence gcc 7.4 warning [NFC]
Without this gcc 7.4.0 complains with
 ../unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp:937:66: error: ISO C++11 requires at least one argument for the "..." in a variadic macro [-Werror]
                          ::testing::ValuesIn(IsBytewiseValueTests));
                                                                   ^

llvm-svn: 365738
2019-07-11 07:07:23 +00:00
Vitaly Buka
1998d38e13 Add IsBytewiseValue unit test
Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63966

llvm-svn: 365710
2019-07-10 22:56:15 +00:00
Johannes Doerfert
6275dfc50e Use "willreturn" in isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor
The `willreturn` function attribute guarantees that a function call will
come back to the call site if the call is also known not to throw.
Therefore, this attribute can be used in
`isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor`.

Patch by Hideto Ueno (@uenoku)

Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63372

llvm-svn: 364580
2019-06-27 19:29:48 +00:00
Nikita Popov
8b6244e618 [ValueTracking] Known bits support for unsigned saturating add/sub
We have two sources of known bits:

1. For adds leading ones of either operand are preserved. For sub
leading zeros of LHS and leading ones of RHS become leading zeros in
the result.

2. The saturating math is a select between add/sub and an all-ones/
zero value. As such we can carry out the add/sub known bits
calculation, and only preseve the known one/zero bits respectively.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58329

llvm-svn: 355223
2019-03-01 20:07:04 +00:00