If the same value is used multiple times in the same instruction,
CaptureTracking may end up reporting the wrong use as being captured,
and/or report the same use as being captured multiple times.
Make sure that all checks take the use operand number into account,
rather than performing unreliable comparisons against the used value.
I'm not sure whether this can cause any problems in practice, but
at least some capture trackers (ArgUsesTracker, AACaptureUseTracker)
do care about which call argument is captured.
If getClobberingMemoryAccess() is called with an explicit
MemoryLocation, but the starting access happens to be a call, the
provided location is currently ignored, and alias analysis queries
will be performed against the call instruction instead. Something
similar happens if the starting access is a load with a MemoryDef.
Change the implementation to not set Q.Inst in the first place if
we want to perform a MemoryLocation-based query, to make sure it
can't be turned into an Instruction-based query along the way...
Additionally, remove the special handling that lifetime.start
intrinsics currently get. They simply report NoAlias for clobbers
between lifetime.start and other calls, but that's obviously not
right if the other call is something like a memset or memcpy. The
default behavior we get from getModRefInfo() will already do the
right thing here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88782
```
// The legacy PM CGPassManager discovers SCCs this way:
for function in the source order
tarjanSCC(function)
// While the new PM CGSCCPassManager does:
for function in the reversed source order [1]
discover a reference graph SCC
build call graph SCCs inside the reference graph SCC
```
In the common cases, reference graph ~= call graph, the new PM order is
undesired because for `a | b | c` (3 independent functions), the new PM will
process them in the reversed order: c, b, a. If `a <-> b <-> c`, we can see
that `-print-after-all` will report the sole SCC as `scc: (c, b, a)`.
This patch corrects the iteration order. The discovered SCC order will match
the legacy PM in the common cases.
For some tests (`Transforms/Inline/cgscc-*.ll` and
`unittests/Analysis/CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp`), the behaviors are dependent on
the SCC discovery order and there are too many check lines for the particular
order. This patch simply reverses the function order to avoid changing too many
check lines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90566
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
URem operations with constant power-of-2 second operands are modeled as
such. This patch on its own has very little impact (e.g. no changes in
CodeGen for MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86 -O3 -flto), but I'll
soon post follow-up patches that make use of it to more accurately
determine the trip multiple.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89821
When we need to prove implication of expressions of different type width,
the default strategy is to widen everything to wider type and prove in this
type. This does not interact well with AddRecs with negative steps and
unsigned predicates: such AddRec will likely not have a `nuw` flag, and its
`zext` to wider type will not be an AddRec. In contraty, `trunc` of an AddRec
in some cases can easily be proved to be an `AddRec` too.
This patch introduces an alternative way to handling implications of different
type widths. If we can prove that wider type values actually fit in the narrow type,
we truncate them and prove the implication in narrow type.
The return was due to revert of underlying patch that this one depends on.
Unit test temporarily disabled because the required logic in SCEV is switched
off due to compile time reasons.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89548
I noticed that alignment was no longer inferred as well after I last merged
our CHERI fork from upstream. I opened this review before seeing that D88669
already fixes the same problem, so this commit simply adds the new test that
I added as part of this change.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89830
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
Any time we insert a block into VisitedPhiBBs, previously cached
values may no longer be valid for the recursive alias queries. As
such, perform them using an empty AAQueryInfo.
Note that if we recurse to the same phi, the block will already
be inserted, so we reuse the old AAQueryInfo, and thus still
protect against infinite recursion.
This problem can appear with with an without BatchAA, but is more
likely to occur with BatchAA, as more values are cached.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90066
Prior to this patch, computeKnownBits would only try to deduce trailing zeros
bits for getelementptrs. This patch adds the logic to treat geps as a series
of add * scaling factor.
Thanks to this patch, using a gep or performing an address computation
directly "by hand" (ptrtoint followed by adds and mul followed by inttoptr)
offers the same computeKnownBits information.
Previously, the "by hand" approach would have given more information.
This is related to https://llvm.org/PR47241.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86364
When we need to prove implication of expressions of different type width,
the default strategy is to widen everything to wider type and prove in this
type. This does not interact well with AddRecs with negative steps and
unsigned predicates: such AddRec will likely not have a `nuw` flag, and its
`zext` to wider type will not be an AddRec. In contraty, `trunc` of an AddRec
in some cases can easily be proved to be an `AddRec` too.
This patch introduces an alternative way to handling implications of different
type widths. If we can prove that wider type values actually fit in the narrow type,
we truncate them and prove the implication in narrow type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89548
Reviewed By: fhahn
AA computes the correct result for phi/a1 aliasing, while BatchAA
produces an incorrect result depening on which queries have been
performed beforehand.
Allow logging final rewards. A final reward is logged only once, and is
serialized as all-zero values, except for the last one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89626
While we haven't encountered an earth-shattering problem with this yet,
by now it is pretty evident that trying to model the ptr->int cast
implicitly leads to having to update every single place that assumed
no such cast could be needed. That is of course the wrong approach.
Let's back this out, and re-attempt with some another approach,
possibly one originally suggested by Eli Friedman in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46786#c20
which should hopefully spare us this pain and more.
This reverts commits 1fb610429308a7c29c5065f5cc35dcc3fd69c8b1,
7324616660fc0995fa8c166e3c392361222d5dbc,
aaafe350bb65dfc24c2cdad4839059ac81899fbe,
e92a8e0c743f83552fac37ecf21e625ba3a4b11e.
I've kept&improved the tests though.
These tests make sure that the range information is properly
understood during computeKnownBits analysis.
NFC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88934
The initial version of the patch was reverted because it missed the check that
the predicate being proved is actually guarded by this check on 1st iteration.
If it was not executed on 1st iteration (but possibly executes after that), then
it is incorrect to use reasoning about IV start to prove it.
Added the test where the miscompile was seen. Unfortunately, my attempts
to reduce it with bugpoint did not succeed; it can further be reduced when
we understand how to do it without losing the initial bug's notion.
Returning assuming the miscompiles are now gone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88208
The logic there only considers `SLT/SGT` predicates. We can use the same logic
for proving `ULT/UGT` predicates if all involved values are non-negative.
Adding full-scale support for unsigned might be challenging because of code amount,
so we can consider this in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88087
Reviewed By: reames
If we know that some predicate is true for AddRec and an invariant
(w.r.t. this AddRec's loop), this fact is, in particular, true on the first
iteration. We can try to prove the facts we need using the start value.
The motivating example is proving things like
```
isImpliedCondOperands(>=, X, 0, {X,+,-1}, 0}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88208
Reviewed By: reames
It was mentioned that D88276 that when a phi node is visited, terminators at their incoming edges should be used for CtxI.
This is a patch that makes two functions (ComputeNumSignBitsImpl, isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison) to do so.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88360
This is a patch that allows isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison to return more precise result
when an argument is given, by looking through its uses at the entry block (and following blocks as well, if it is checking poison only).
This is useful when there is a function call with noundef arguments at the entry block.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88207
For some expressions, we can use information from loop guards when
we are looking for a maximum. This patch applies information from
loop guards to the expression used to compute the maximum backedge
taken count in howFarToZero. It currently replaces an unknown
expression X with UMin(X, Y), if the loop is guarded by
X ult Y.
This patch is minimal in what conditions it applies, and there
are a few TODOs to generalize.
This partly addresses PR40961. We will also need an update to
LV to address it completely.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67178
This takes the mapped instructions from the IRInstructionMapper, and
passes it to the Suffix Tree to find the repeated substrings. Within
each set of repeated substrings, the IRSimilarityCandidates are compared
against one another for structure, and ensuring that the operands in the
instructions are used in the same way. Each of these structurally
similarity IRSimilarityCandidates are contained in a SimilarityGroup.
Tests checking for identifying identity of structure, different
isomorphic structure, and different
nonisomoprhic structure are found in
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86972
Just because sequences of instructions are similar to one another,
doesn't mean they are doing the same thing.
This introduces a structural check for the IRSimilarityCandidate that
compares two IRSimilarityCandidates against one another, and in each
instruction creates a mapping between the operands and results, or
checks that the existing mapping is valid. If this check passes, it
means we have structurally similar IRSimilarityCandidates.
Tests for whether the candidates are found in
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp.
Recommit of: b27db2bb68163fa5bcb4a8f631a305eb5adb44e5 for Differential
URL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86971
Just because sequences of instructions are similar to one another,
doesn't mean they are doing the same thing.
This introduces a structural check for the IRSimilarityCandidate that
compares two IRSimilarityCandidates against one another, and in each
instruction creates a mapping between the operands and results, or
checks that the existing mapping is valid. If this check passes, it
means we have structurally similar IRSimilarityCandidates.
Tests for whether the candidates are found in
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp.
This seems to fit the CGSCC updates model better than calling
addNewFunctionInto{Ref,}SCC() on newly created/outlined functions.
Now addNewFunctionInto{Ref,}SCC() are no longer necessary.
However, this doesn't work on newly outlined functions that aren't
referenced by the original function. e.g. if a() was outlined into b()
and c(), but c() is only referenced by b() and not by a(), this will
trigger an assert.
This also fixes an issue I was seeing with newly created functions not
having passes run on them.
Ran check-llvm with expensive checks.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87798
The IRSimilarityCandidate is a container to hold a region of
IRInstructions and offer interfaces for the starting instruction, ending
instruction, parent function, length. It also assigns a global value
number for each unique instance of a value in the region.
It also contains an interface to compare two IRSimilarity as to whether
they have the same sequence of similar instructions.
Tests for whether the instructions are similar are found in
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp.
Recommit of: 4944bb190fed8861d4d043eaf45e3c1e12aa2dc5
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86970
The IRSimilarityCandidate is a container to hold a region of
IRInstructions and offer interfaces for the starting instruction, ending
instruction, parent function, length. It also assigns a global value
number for each unique instance of a value in the region.
It also contains an interface to compare two IRSimilarity as to whether
they have the same sequence of similar instructions.
Tests for whether the instructions are similar are found in
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86970
The IRInstructionData structs are a different representation of the
program. This list treats the program as if it was "flattened" and
the only parent is this list. This lets us easily create ranges of
instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86969
This patch extends SCEVParameterRewriter to support rewriting unknown
epxressions to arbitrary SCEV expressions. It will be used by further
patches.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67176
This introduces the IRInstructionMapper, and the associated wrapper for
instructions, IRInstructionData, that maps IR level Instructions to
unsigned integers.
Mapping is done mainly by using the "isSameOperationAs" comparison
between two instructions. If they return true, the opcode, result type,
and operand types of the instruction are used to hash the instruction
with an unsigned integer. The mapper accepts instruction ranges, and
adds each resulting integer to a list, and each wrapped instruction to
a separate list.
At present, branches, phi nodes are not mapping and exception handling
is illegal. Debug instructions are not considered.
The different mapping schemes are tested in
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
Recommit of: b04c1a9d3127730c05e8a22a0e931a12a39528df
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86968
This introduces the IRInstructionMapper, and the associated wrapper for
instructions, IRInstructionData, that maps IR level Instructions to
unsigned integers.
Mapping is done mainly by using the "isSameOperationAs" comparison
between two instructions. If they return true, the opcode, result type,
and operand types of the instruction are used to hash the instruction
with an unsigned integer. The mapper accepts instruction ranges, and
adds each resulting integer to a list, and each wrapped instruction to
a separate list.
At present, branches, phi nodes are not mapping and exception handling
is illegal. Debug instructions are not considered.
The different mapping schemes are tested in
unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86968
When adding a new function via addNewFunctionIntoRefSCC(), it creates a
new node and immediately populates the edges. Since populateSlow() calls
G->get() on all referenced functions, it will create a node (but not
populate it) for functions that haven't yet been added. If we add two
mutually recursive functions, the assert that the node should never have
been created will fire when the second function is added. So here we
remove that assert since the node may have already been created (but not
yet populated).
createNode() is only called from addNewFunctionInto{,Ref}SCC().
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47502
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87623
This patch adds a isConditionImplied function that
takes a constraint and returns true if the constraint
is implied by the current constraints in the system.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84545
This patch recommits "[ConstraintSystem] Add helpers to deal with linear constraints."
(it reverts the revert commit 8da6ae4ce1b686c5c13698e4c5ee937811fda6f7).
The reason for the revert was using __builtin_multiply_overflow, which
is not available for all compilers. The patch has been updated to use
MulOverflow from MathExtras.h
