Not every program needs this information.
In particular, it is necessary and sufficient for a static linker to scan the
section table.
llvm-svn: 242833
llvm-readobj exists for testing llvm. We can safely stop the program
the first time we know the input in corrupted.
This is in preparation for making it handle a few more broken files.
llvm-svn: 242656
Column information is present in CodeView when the line table subsection
has bit 0 set to 1 in it's flags field. The column information is
represented as a pair of 16-bit quantities: a starting and ending
column. This information is present at the end of the chunk, after all
the line-PC pairs.
llvm-svn: 241764
When talking about the virtual address of sections the coff spec says:
... for simplicity, compilers should set this to zero. Otherwise, it is an
arbitrary value that is subtracted from offsets during relocation.
We don't currently subtract it, so check that it is zero.
If some producer does create such files, we can change getRelocationOffset
instead.
llvm-svn: 241447
This function can really fail since the string table offset can be out of
bounds.
Using ErrorOr makes sure the error is checked.
Hopefully a lot of the boilerplate code in tools/* can go away once we have
a diagnostic manager in Object.
llvm-svn: 241297
This also improves the logic of what is an error:
* getSection(uint_32): only return an error if the index is out of bounds. The
index 0 corresponds to a perfectly valid entry.
* getSection(Elf_Sym): Returns null for symbols that normally don't have
sections and error for out of bound indexes.
In many places this just moves the report_fatal_error up the stack, but those
can then be fixed in smaller patches.
llvm-svn: 241156
This moves the error checking for string tables to getStringTable which returns
an ErrorOr<StringRef>.
This improves error checking, makes it uniform across all string tables and
makes it possible to check them once instead of once per name.
llvm-svn: 240950
It was a fairly broken concept for an ELF only class.
An ELF file can have two symbol tables, but they have exactly the same
format. There is no concept of a dynamic or a static symbol. Storing this
on the iterator also makes us do more work per symbol than necessary. To fetch
a name we would:
* Find if we had a static or a dynamic symbol.
* Look at the corresponding symbol table and find the string table section.
* Look at the string table section to fetch its contents.
* Compute the name as a substring of the string table.
All but the last step can be done per symbol table instead of per symbol. This
is a step in that direction.
llvm-svn: 240939
The parser provides a convenient interface for reading llvm stackmap v1 sections
in object files.
This patch also includes a new option for llvm-readobj, '-stackmap', which uses
the parser to pretty-print stackmap sections for debugging/testing purposes.
llvm-svn: 240860
This is still a really odd function. Most calls are in object format specific
contexts and should probably be replaced with a more direct query, but at least
now this is not too obnoxious to use.
llvm-svn: 240777
Summary: This will be used by the R600 backend.
Reviewers: chandlerc, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10389
llvm-svn: 240329
There are 3 types of relocations on MachO
* Scattered
* Section based
* Symbol based
On ELF and COFF relocations are symbol based.
We were in the strange situation that we abstracted over two of them. This makes
section based relocations MachO only.
llvm-svn: 240149
In a relocation target can take 3 basic forms
* A r_value in scattered relocations.
* A symbol in external relocations.
* A section is non-external relocations.
Have the dump reflect that. With this change we go from
CHECK-NEXT: Extern: 0
CHECK-NEXT: Type: X86_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR (5)
CHECK-NEXT: Symbol: 0x2
CHECK-NEXT: Scattered: 0
To just
// CHECK-NEXT: Type: X86_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR (5)
// CHECK-NEXT: Section: __data (2)
Since the relocation is with a section, we print the seciton name and don't
need to say that it is not scattered or external.
Someone motivated can add further special cases for things like
ARM64_RELOC_ADDEND and ARM_RELOC_PAIR.
llvm-svn: 240073
The underlaying issues is that this code can't really know if an OS specific or
processor specific section number should return true or false.
One option would be to assert or return an error, but that looks like over
engineering since extensions are not that common.
It seems better to have these be direct implementation of the ELF spec so that
they are natural for someone familiar with ELF reading the code.
Code that does have to handle OS/Architecture specific values can do it at
a higher level.
llvm-svn: 239618
