This is a redo of D7208 ( r227242 - http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=227242 ).
The patch was reverted because an AArch64 target could infinite loop after the change in DAGCombiner
to merge vector stores. That happened because AArch64's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() wasn't telling
the truth. It reported all unaligned memory accesses as fast, but then split some 128-bit unaligned
accesses up in performSTORECombine() because they are slow.
This patch attempts to fix the problem in AArch's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() while preserving
existing (perhaps questionable) lowering behavior.
The x86 test shows that store merging is working as intended for a target with fast 32-byte unaligned
stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12635
llvm-svn: 248622
If the stores are storing values from loads which partially
alias the stores, we could end up placing the merged loads
and stores on the same chain which has the potential to break.
Each store may have a different chain dependency on only some
of the original loads. Create a new TokenFactor to capture all
of the required dependencies of the stores rather than assuming
all stores can use the same chain.
The testcase is a situation where this happens, although
it does not have an observable change from this. The DAG nodes
just happened to not be reordered before despite this missing
chain dependency.
This is based on an off-list report for an out of tree target
which regressed due to r246307 and I haven't managed to find a case
where the nodes do end up reordered with an in tree target.
llvm-svn: 248468
This patch adds support for combining patterns such as (FMUL(FADD(1.0, x), y)) and (FMUL(FSUB(x, 1.0), y)) to their FMA equivalents.
This is useful in particular for linear interpolation cases such as (FADD(FMUL(x, t), FMUL(y, FSUB(1.0, t))))
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13003
llvm-svn: 248210
If storing multiple FP constants, some subset of the stores
would be replaced with integers due to visit order, so
MergeConsecutiveStores would only partially merge
these.
llvm-svn: 248169
After D10403, we had FMF in the DAG but disabled by default. Nick reported no crashing errors after some stress testing,
so I enabled them at r243687. However, Escha soon notified us of a bug not covered by any in-tree regression tests:
if we don't propagate the flags, we may fail to CSE DAG nodes because differing FMF causes them to not match. There is
one test case in this patch to prove that point.
This patch hopes to fix or leave a 'TODO' for all of the in-tree places where we create nodes that are FMF-capable. I
did this by putting an assert in SelectionDAG.getNode() to find any FMF-capable node that was being created without FMF
( D11807 ). I then ran all regression tests and test-suite and confirmed that everything passes.
This patch exposes remaining work to get DAG FMF to be fully functional: (1) add the flags to non-binary nodes such as
FCMP, FMA and FNEG; (2) add the flags to intrinsics; (3) use the flags as conditions for transforms rather than the
current global settings.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12095
llvm-svn: 247815
Summary:
The BUILD_VECTOR node will truncate its operators to match the
type. We need to take this into account when constant folding -
we need to perform a truncation before constant folding the elements.
This is because the upper bits can change the result, depending on
the operation type (for example this is the case for min/max).
This change also adds a regression test.
Reviewers: jmolloy
Subscribers: jmolloy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12697
llvm-svn: 247265
Use and check the 'IsFast' optional parameter to TLI.allowsMemoryAccess() any time
we have a merged access candidate. Without this patch, we were generating unaligned
16-byte (SSE) memops for x86 targets where those accesses are slow.
This change was mentioned in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10662 and
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10905
and will help solve PR21711.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12573
llvm-svn: 246771
SETCC is one of those special node types for which operation actions (legality,
etc.) is keyed off of an operand type, not the node's value type. This makes
sense because the value type of a legal SETCC node is determined by its
operands' value type (via the TLI function getSetCCResultType). When the
SDAGBuilder creates SETCC nodes, it either creates them with an MVT::i1 value
type, or directly with the value type provided by TLI.getSetCCResultType.
The first problem being fixed here is that DAGCombine had several places
querying TLI.isOperationLegal on SETCC, but providing the return of
getSetCCResultType, instead of the operand type directly. This does not mean
what the author thought, and "luckily", most in-tree targets have SETCC with
Custom lowering, instead of marking them Legal, so these checks return false
anyway.
The second problem being fixed here is that two of the DAGCombines could create
SETCC nodes with arbitrary (integer) value types; specifically, those that
would simplify:
(setcc a, b, op1) and|or (setcc a, b, op2) -> setcc a, b, op3
(which is possible for some combinations of (op1, op2))
If the operands of the and|or node are actual setcc nodes, then this is not an
issue (because the and|or must share the same type), but, the relevant code in
DAGCombiner::visitANDLike and DAGCombiner::visitORLike actually calls
DAGCombiner::isSetCCEquivalent on each operand, and that function will
recognise setcc-like select_cc nodes with other return types. And, thus, when
creating new SETCC nodes, we need to be careful to respect the value-type
constraint. This is even true before type legalization, because it is quite
possible for the SELECT_CC node to have a legal type that does not happen to
match the corresponding TLI.getSetCCResultType type.
To be explicit, there is nothing that later fixes the value types of SETCC
nodes (if the type is legal, but does not happen to match
TLI.getSetCCResultType). Creating SETCCs with an MVT::i1 value type seems to
work only because, either MVT::i1 is not legal, or it is what
TLI.getSetCCResultType returns if it is legal. Fixing that is a larger change,
however. For the time being, restrict the relevant transformations to produce
only SETCC nodes with a value type matching TLI.getSetCCResultType (or MVT::i1
prior to type legalization).
Fixes PR24636.
llvm-svn: 246507
This was part of D7208 (r227242), but that commit was reverted because it exposed
a bug in AArch64 lowering. I should have that fixed and the rest of the commit
reinstated soon.
llvm-svn: 246493
DAGCombine has a utility wrapper around TLI's getSetCCResultType; use it in the
one place in DAGCombine still directly calling the TLI function. NFC.
llvm-svn: 246482
This code was dead when it was committed in r23665 (Oct 7, 2005), and before it
reaches its 10th anniversary, it really should go. We can always bring it back
if we'd like, but it forms more SETCC nodes, and the way we do legality
checking on SETCC nodes is wrong in a number of places, and removing this means
fewer places to fix. NFC.
llvm-svn: 246466
When combiner AA is enabled, look at stores on the same chain.
Non-aliasing stores are moved to the same chain so the existing
code fails because it expects to find an adajcent store on a consecutive
chain.
Because of how DAGCombiner tries these store combines,
MergeConsecutiveStores doesn't see the correct set of stores on the chain
when it visits the other stores. Each store individually has its chain
fixed before trying to merge consecutive stores, and then tries to merge
stores from that point before the other stores have been processed to
have their chains fixed. To fix this, attempt to use FindBetterChain
on any possibly neighboring stores in visitSTORE.
Suppose you have 4 32-bit stores that should be merged into 1 vector
store. One store would be visited first, fixing the chain. What happens is
because not all of the store chains have yet been fixed, 2 of the stores
are merged. The other 2 stores later have their chains fixed,
but because the other stores were already merged, they have different
memory types and merging the two different sized stores is not
supported and would be more difficult to handle.
llvm-svn: 246307
Fixes PR24602: r245689 introduced an unguarded use of
SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic, which returns 0 when it fails
because of opaque (hoisted) constants.
llvm-svn: 246217
The FP16_TO_FP node only uses the bottom 16 bits of its input, so the
following pattern can be optimised by removing the AND:
(FP16_TO_FP (AND op, 0xffff)) -> (FP16_TO_FP op)
This is a common pattern for ARM targets when functions have __fp16
arguments, as they are passed as floats (so that they get passed in the
correct registers), but then bitcast and truncated to ignore the top 16
bits.
llvm-svn: 245832
This is intended to improve code generation for GEPs, as the index value is
shifted by the element size and in GEPs of multi-dimensional arrays the index
of higher dimensions is multiplied by the lower dimension size.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12197
llvm-svn: 245689
We still need to add constant folding of vector comparisons to fold the tests for targets that don't support the respective min/max nodes
I needed to update 2011-12-06-AVXVectorExtractCombine to load a vector instead of using a constant vector to prevent it folding
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12118
llvm-svn: 245503
Check to see if this is a CONCAT_VECTORS of a bunch of EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR operations. If so, and if the EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR vector inputs come from at most two distinct vectors the same size as the result, attempt to turn this into a legal shuffle.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12125
llvm-svn: 245490
This removes the isPow2SDivCheap() query, as it is not currently used in
any meaningful way. isIntDivCheap() no longer relies on a state variable
(as all in-tree target set it to false), but the interface allows querying
based on the type optimization level.
NFC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12082
llvm-svn: 245430
The current code normalizes select(C0, x, select(C1, x, y)) towards
select(C0|C1, x, y) if the targets prefers that form. This patch adds an
additional rule that if the select(C1, x, y) part already exists in the
function then we want to normalize into the other direction because the
effects of reusing the existing value are bigger than transforming into
the target preferred form.
This addresses regressions following r238793, see also:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150727/290272.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11616
llvm-svn: 245350
For cases where we TRUNCATE and then ZERO_EXTEND to a larger size (often from vector legalization), see if we can mask the source data and then ZERO_EXTEND (instead of after a ANY_EXTEND). This can help avoid having to generate a larger mask, and possibly applying it to several sub-vectors.
(zext (truncate x)) -> (zext (and(x, m))
Includes a minor patch to SystemZ to better recognise 8/16-bit zero extension patterns from RISBG bit-extraction code.
This is the first of a number of minor patches to help improve the conversion of byte masks to clear mask shuffles.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11764
llvm-svn: 245160
This commit removes the global manager variable which is responsible for
storing and allocating pseudo source values and instead it introduces a new
manager class named 'PseudoSourceValueManager'. Machine functions now own an
instance of the pseudo source value manager class.
This commit also modifies the 'get...' methods in the 'MachinePointerInfo'
class to construct pseudo source values using the instance of the pseudo
source value manager object from the machine function.
This commit updates calls to the 'get...' methods from the 'MachinePointerInfo'
class in a lot of different files because those calls now need to pass in a
reference to a machine function to those methods.
This change will make it easier to serialize pseudo source values as it will
enable me to transform the mips specific MipsCallEntry PseudoSourceValue
subclass into two target independent subclasses.
Reviewers: Akira Hatanaka
llvm-svn: 244693
Summary:
For example:
s6 = s0*s5;
s2 = s6*s6 + s6;
...
s4 = s6*s3;
We notice that it is possible for s2 is folded to fma (s0, s5, fmul (s6 s6)).
This only happens when Aggressive is true, otherwise hasOneUse() check
already prevents from folding the multiplication with more uses.
Test Plan: test/CodeGen/NVPTX/fma-assoc.ll
Patch by Xuetian Weng
Reviewers: hfinkel, apazos, jingyue, ohsallen, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11855
llvm-svn: 244649
Create wrapper methods in the Function class for the OptimizeForSize and MinSize
attributes. We want to hide the logic of "or'ing" them together when optimizing
just for size (-Os).
Currently, we are not consistent about this and rely on a front-end to always set
OptimizeForSize (-Os) if MinSize (-Oz) is on. Thus, there are 18 FIXME changes here
that should be added as follow-on patches with regression tests.
This patch is NFC-intended: it just replaces existing direct accesses of the attributes
by the equivalent wrapper call.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11734
llvm-svn: 243994
The XformToShuffleWithZero method currently checks AND masks at the per-lane level for all-one and all-zero constants and attempts to convert them to legal shuffle clear masks.
This patch generalises XformToShuffleWithZero, splitting and checking the sub-lanes of the constants down to the byte level to see if any legal shuffle clear masks are possible. This allows a lot of masks (often from legalization or truncation) to be folded into existing shuffle patterns and removes a lot of constant mask loading.
There are a few examples of poor shuffle lowering that are exposed by this patch that will be cleaned up in future patches (e.g. merging shuffles that are separated by bitcasts, x86 legalized v8i8 zero extension uses PMOVZX+AND+AND instead of AND+PMOVZX, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11518
llvm-svn: 243831
Making allowableAlignment() more accessible was suggested as a predecessor patch
for D10662, so I've pulled it into TargetLowering. This let's us remove 4 instances
of duplicate logic in LegalizeDAG.
There's a subtle functional change in the implementation: the existing
allowableAlignment() code was using getPrefTypeAlignment() when checking
alignment with the DataLayout and assumed that was fast. In this implementation,
we use getABITypeAlignment() and assume that is fast. See the TODO comment or the
discussion in the Phab review for future improvements in this implementation
(don't use the data layout at all).
There are no regression test changes from this difference, and I'm not sure how to
expose it via a test. I think we actually do want to provide the 'Fast' param when
checking this from DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(). Ie, we shouldn't merge
stores if the new stores are not going to be fast. But that change will require
fixing allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess() overrides as noted in D10662.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10905
llvm-svn: 243549
PR24141: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24141
contains a test case where we have duplicate entries in a node's uses() list.
After r241826, we use CombineTo() to delete dead nodes when combining the uses into
reciprocal multiplies, but this fails if we encounter the just-deleted node again in
the list.
The solution in this patch is to not add duplicate entries to the list of users that
we will subsequently iterate over. For the test case, this avoids triggering the
combine divisors logic entirely because there really is only one user of the divisor.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11345
llvm-svn: 243500
This fix was suggested as part of D11345 and is part of fixing PR24141.
With this change, we can avoid walking the uses of a divisor node if the target
doesn't want the combineRepeatedFPDivisors transform in the first place.
There is no NFC-intended other than that.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11531
llvm-svn: 243498
We don't bitcast the UNDEFs - that is done in visitVECTOR_SHUFFLE, and the getValueType should come from the operand's SDValue not the SDNode.
llvm-svn: 242640
The motivation is to allow GatherAllAliases / FindBetterChain
to not give up on dependent loads of a pointer from constant memory.
This is important for AMDGPU, because most loads are pointers
derived from a load of a kernel argument from constant memory.
llvm-svn: 241948
This patch fixes bugs that were exposed by the addition of fast-math-flags in the DAG:
r237046 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL237046 ):
1. When replacing a division node, it's not enough to RAUW.
We should call CombineTo() to delete dead nodes and combine again.
2. Because we are changing the DAG, we can't return an empty SDValue
after the transform. As the code comments say:
Visitation implementation - Implement dag node combining for different node types.
The semantics are as follows: Return Value:
SDValue.getNode() == 0 - No change was made
SDValue.getNode() == N - N was replaced, is dead and has been handled.
otherwise - N should be replaced by the returned Operand.
The new test case shows no difference with or without this patch, but it will crash if
we re-apply r237046 or enable FMF via the current -enable-fmf-dag cl::opt.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9893
llvm-svn: 241826
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11040
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241778
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11037
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241776
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11017
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241655
Summary:
SelectionDAG itself is not invoking directly the DataLayout in the
TargetMachine, but the "TargetLowering" class is still using it. I'll
address it in a following commit.
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11000
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241618
The code responsible for shl folding in the DAGCombiner was assuming incorrectly that all constants are less than 64 bits. This patch simply changes the way values are compared.
It has been reverted previously because of some problems with comparing APInt with raw uint64_t. That has been fixed/changed with r241204.
llvm-svn: 241254
Summary: This patch fixes the cases of sext/zext constant folding in DAG combiner where constans do not fit 64 bits. The fix simply removes un$
Test Plan: New regression test included.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10607
llvm-svn: 240991
We had a hack in SDAGBuilder in place to work around this but now we
can avoid that. Call BuildExactSDIV from BuildSDIV so DAGCombiner can
perform this trick automatically.
The added check in DAGCombiner is necessary to prevent exact sdiv by pow2
from regressing as the target-specific pow2 lowering is not aware of
exact bits yet.
This is mostly covered by existing tests. One side effect is that we
get the better lowering for exact vector sdivs now too :)
llvm-svn: 240891
Summary: The code responsible for shl folding in the DAGCombiner was assuming incorrectly that all constants are less than 64 bits. This patch simply changes the way values are compared.
Test Plan: A regression test included.
Reviewers: andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: andreadb, test, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10602
llvm-svn: 240291
This will allow classes to implement the AA interface without deriving
from the class or referencing an internal enum of some other class as
their return types.
Also, to a pretty fundamental extent, concepts such as 'NoAlias',
'MayAlias', and 'MustAlias' are first class concepts in LLVM and we
aren't saving anything by scoping them heavily.
My mild preference would have been to use a scoped enum, but that
feature is essentially completely broken AFAICT. I'm extremely
disappointed. For example, we cannot through any reasonable[1] means
construct an enum class (or analog) which has scoped names but converts
to a boolean in order to test for the possibility of aliasing.
[1]: Richard Smith came up with a "solution", but it requires class
templates, and lots of boilerplate setting up the enumeration multiple
times. Something like Boost.PP could potentially bundle this up, but
even that would be quite painful and it doesn't seem realistically worth
it. The enum class solution would probably work without the need for
a bool conversion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10495
llvm-svn: 240255
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
that it is its own entity in the form of MemoryLocation, and update all
the callers.
This is an entirely mechanical change. References to "Location" within
AA subclases become "MemoryLocation", and elsewhere
"AliasAnalysis::Location" becomes "MemoryLocation". Hope that helps
out-of-tree folks update.
llvm-svn: 239885
This is an updated version of the patch that was checked in at:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL237046
but subsequently reverted because it exposed a bug in the DAG Combiner:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9893
This time, there's an enablement flag ("EnableFMFInDAG") around the code in
SelectionDAGBuilder where we copy the set of FP optimization flags from IR
instructions to DAG nodes. So, in theory, there should be no functional change
from this patch as-is, but it will allow testing with the added functionality
to proceed via "-enable-fmf-dag" passed to llc.
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10403
llvm-svn: 239828
Reapply r239539. Don't assume the collected number of
stores is the same vector size. Just take the first N
stores to fill the vector.
llvm-svn: 239825
Now actually stores the non-zero constant instead of 0.
I somehow forgot to include this part of r238108.
The test change was just an independent instruction order swap,
so just add another check line to satisfy CHECK-NEXT.
llvm-svn: 239539
For targets with a free fneg, this fold is always a net loss if it
ends up duplicating the multiply, so definitely avoid it.
This might be true for some targets without a free fneg too, but
I'll leave that for future investigation.
llvm-svn: 239167
Also, moved test cases from CodeGen/X86/fold-buildvector-bug.ll into
CodeGen/X86/buildvec-insertvec.ll and regenerated CHECK lines using
update_llc_test_checks.py.
llvm-svn: 239142
Method 'visitBUILD_VECTOR' in the DAGCombiner knows how to combine a
build_vector of a bunch of extract_vector_elt nodes and constant zero nodes
into a shuffle blend with a zero vector.
However, method 'visitBUILD_VECTOR' forgot that a floating point
build_vector may contain negative zero as well as positive zero.
Example:
define <2 x double> @example(<2 x double> %A) {
entry:
%0 = extractelement <2 x double> %A, i32 0
%1 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %0, i32 0
%2 = insertelement <2 x double> %1, double -0.0, i32 1
ret <2 x double> %2
}
Before this patch, llc (with -mattr=+sse4.1) wrongly generated
movq %xmm0, %xmm0 # xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero
So, the sign bit of the negative zero was effectively lost.
This patch fixes the problem by adding explicit checks for positive zero.
With this patch, llc produces the following code for the example above:
movhpd .LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm0
where .LCPI0_0 referes to a 'double -0'.
llvm-svn: 239070
On GPU targets, materializing constants is cheap and stores are
expensive, so only doing this for zero vectors was silly.
Most of the new testcases aren't optimally merged, and are for
later improvements.
llvm-svn: 238108
This patch improves support for sign extension of the lower lanes of vectors of integers by making use of the SSE41 pmovsx* sign extension instructions where possible, and optimizing the sign extension by shifts on pre-SSE41 targets (avoiding the use of i64 arithmetic shifts which require scalarization).
It converts SIGN_EXTEND nodes to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG where necessary, that more closely matches the pmovsx* instruction than the default approach of using SIGN_EXTEND_INREG which splits the operation (into an ANY_EXTEND lowered to a shuffle followed by shifts) making instruction matching difficult during lowering. Necessary support for SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG has been added to the DAGCombiner.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9848
llvm-svn: 237885
DAG.FoldConstantArithmetic() can fail even though both operands are
Constants if OpaqueConstants are involved. Continue trying other combine
possibilities in tis case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6946
Somewhat related to PR21801 / rdar://19211454
llvm-svn: 237822
In CombineToPreIndexedLoadStore, when the offset is a constant, we have code
that looks for other uses of the pointer which are constant offset computations
so that they can be rewritten in terms of the updated pointer so that we don't
need to keep a copy of the base pointer to compute these constant offsets.
Unfortunately, when it iterated over the uses, it did so by SDNodes, and so we
could confuse ourselves if the base pointer was produced by a node that had
multiple results (because we would not immediately exclude uses of the other
node results). This was reported as PR22755. Unfortunately, we don't have a
test case (and I've also been unable to produce one thus far), but at least the
mistake is clear. The right way to fix this problem is to make use of the information
contained in the use iterators to filter out any uses of other results of the
node producing the base pointer.
This should be mostly NFC, but should also fix PR22755 (for which,
unfortunately, we have no in-tree test case).
llvm-svn: 237576
This is a less ambitious version of:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL236546
because that was reverted in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL236600
because it caused memory corruption that wasn't related to FMF
but was actually due to making nodes with 2 operands derive from a
plain SDNode rather than a BinarySDNode.
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
...which split the existing nsw / nuw / exact flags and FMF
into their own struct.
llvm-svn: 237046
The bug showed up as a compile-time assertion failure:
Assertion `NumBits >= MIN_INT_BITS && "bitwidth too small"' failed
when building msan tests on x86-64.
Prior to r236850, this bug was masked due to a bogus alignment check,
which also accidentally rejected non-byte-sized accesses. Afterwards,
an invalid ElementSizeBytes == 0 got further into the function, and
triggered the assertion failure.
It would probably be a good idea to allow it to handle merging stores
of unusual widths as well, but for now, to un-break it, I'm just
making the minimal fix.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9626
llvm-svn: 236927
1) check whether the alignment of the memory is sufficient for the
*merged* store or load to be efficient.
Not doing so can result in some ridiculously poor code generation, if
merging creates a vector operation which must be aligned but isn't.
2) DON'T check that the alignment of each load/store is equal. If
you're merging 2 4-byte stores, the first *might* have 8-byte
alignment, but the second certainly will have 4-byte alignment. We do
want to allow those to be merged.
llvm-svn: 236850
